Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 161
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

thats for the gti-r

it depends on what skylineyou want to compare it to....r32,r33,r34??

Nissan Skyline R32

GTS-T/GTS-4

PRICE: $17K - $35K RWD

DRIVE YEAR: 89-93

ENGINE: RB20DET 2.0 DOHC 24V turbo 6cyl

WEIGHT: 1290kg

POWER: 160kW

TORQUE: 263Nm

0-100: 6.9

0-400: 15.01

Nissan Skyline R33

GTS-T/GTS-4

$20K - $46K

RWD

94-98

RB25DET 2.5 DOHC 24V turbo 6cyl

1370kg

184kW

274Nm

6.2

14.37

Nissan Skyline R34

GTS-T

$50K - $80K

RWD

98+

RB25DET

2.5 DOHC 24V turbo 6cyl VVT

1410kg

206kW

343Nm

6.0

15.00

taken from nissansilvia.com

The GTi-R also uses quad throttle bodies and is giving you around 30kw more in stock form that an S15

As cereal said as funky as S15's are, putting an S15 motor in a Gti-R is

A) ****ing expensive due to cost of S15 engine

B) A downgrade in power

And no, dont believe S15 box will fit either due to 4wd

Originally posted by lixid

ok

well are there many pulser gtir on the market, and are the parts easy to source as well??

because i don't see many gtir on the sydney road

I don't think you should have too much of a problem finding parts for a gti-r, but they probably wont be nissan parts......you'll be able to get Jap performance parts no problems.

There aren't many of them on Sydney roads because there aren't many of them on any roads........Only 4500 of them were ever made.

When I had the cash money for my car I was flipping up for either a GTS-t or GTi-R. The skyline won by a hair.

I'd admit that the Skyline won alot due to looks, as I got turned off the GTi-R everytime I saw the rear end of it...

Does anyone know of anyone who makes a body kit for these things ? NOT over the top. Just like side skirts and maybe a slighly revised rear bar ?

Some parts from the N14 Pulsar do fit...."SOME"

An early HPI had a review on one of them...Interesting. There ARE too many R33 Taxi's doing the rounds these days...

A mate of mine at work has a gtir & i got a r32 skyline.

We usually try 2 get a red light so we can have a mini drag, goin home from work. The gtir kicks my arse by far! & all it done to it was a cat back exhaust + pod filter & i got a full exhaust & pod filter.

2 be honest though, that gtir aint that crash hot. The car interior aint in the best condition, it a lucky dip with imports, you get some good ones & you got some sour ones & ive seen a few sour gtir

He had it for over 6months now & he purchased it for $22K i think it was & little steep i know. I wouldnt personally buy a 90-93 year old second hand car for that price, im sure you can import it & get it alot cheaper then the price my mate got it for.

I got my skyline for under $15k, once i reach $22k im sure my car will skin alive the gtir.

Joe.

The Gti-r is an awesome package, performance wise. They can look pretty tidy (nice one comes around near my work occasionally) but the fact it's a hatch and so small puts me off. That said, i would never bag, nor talk anyone out of buying one.

And if you're gunna buy a hot hatch...make sure it really is a hot hatch :uh-huh:

John at Unique Auto's at Castle Hill has one in Black at the moment. It was well under $22000. He took me for a quick spin last Saturday. Very ordinary interior,,,YUK!!! and don't talk to me about front end drift coming out of corners. That poor little car suffers from far to much weight in the front,,,what would make it worse is modding it,,, so you run a big fmic and doi away with the bonnet mounted one,,,which we all know doesn't work. That would add 25-30 more kilo's to the front,,,,Scary.

I was all for buying one before we got the Skyline,,,,I'm so glad we didn't.

Neil.

Guest lixid

i will wait until i got my power fc into my car and see how it goes

because i am a skilless driver so i think a 4wd will cover some of my weak points while driving. that's all. i didn't know that a gtir is a 4wd. and i thought it is very cheap. once i found out that gtir is a 4wd, with such performance, i suddenly had the thought.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Get an inspection camera up there. 
    • Yeah, but look at the margin in viscosity between the 40 and the 60 at 125°C. It is not very large. It is the difference between 7 and 11 cP. Compare that to the viscosity at only 90°C. The viscosity axis is logarithmic. The numbers at 90 are ~15 and ~35. That is about half for the 40 wt oil and <half for the 60. You give up viscosity EXPONENTIALLY as temperature rises. Literally. That is why I declare thicker oil to be a bandaid, and a brittle one at that. Keep the oil temperature under about 110°C and you should be better off.   Having said all of that, which remains true as a general principle, if you have indeed lost enough oil from the sump that the pump was seeing slightly aerated oil, then all bets are off. That would of course cause oil pressure to collapse. And 35 psi is a collapse given what you were doing to the engine. Especially if the oil was that hot and viscosity had also collapsed. And I would put money on rod or main bearings being the source of the any noise that registered as knock. Hydraulic lifters should be able to cope with the hotter oil and lower pressure enough to prvent too much high frequency noise, although I am willing to admit it could be the source.
    • Thanks for the reply mate. Well I really hope its a hose then not engine out job
    • But.... the reason I want to run a 60 weight is so at 125C it has the same viscosity as a 40 weight at 100C. That's the whole reason. If the viscosity changes that much to drop oil pressure from 73psi to 36psi then that's another reason I should be running an oil that mimics the 40 weight at 100C. I have datalogs from the dyno with the oil pressure hitting 73psi at full throttle/high RPM. At the dyno the oil temp was around 100-105C. The pump has a 70psi internal relief spring. It will never go/can't go above 70psi. The GM recommendation of 6psi per 1000rpm is well under that... The oil sensor for logging in LS's is at the valley plate at the back of  the block/rear of where the heads are near the firewall. It's also where the knock sensors are which are notable for 'false knock'. I'm hoping I just didn't have enough oil up top causing some chatter instead of rods being sad (big hopium/copium I know) LS's definitely heat up the oil more than RB's do, the stock vettes for example will hit 300F(150C) in a lap or two and happily track for years and years. This is the same oil cooler that I had when I was in RB land, being the Setrab 25 row oil cooler HEL thing. I did think about putting a fan in there to pull air out more, though I don't know if that will actually help in huge load situations with lots of speed. I think when I had the auto cooler. The leak is where the block runs to the oil cooler lines, the OEM/Dash oil pressure sender is connected at that junction and is what broke. I'm actually quite curious to see how much oil in total capacity is actually left in the engine. As it currently stands I'm waiting on that bush to adapt the sender to it. The sump is still full (?) of oil and the lines and accusump have been drained, but the filter and block are off. I suspect there's maybe less than 1/2 the total capacity there should be in there. I have noticed in the past that topping up oil has improved oil pressure, as reported by the dash sensor. This is all extremely sketchy hence wanting to get it sorted out lol.
×
×
  • Create New...