Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 81
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm surprised Bracks isn't behind wanting to tax tank water, but since the corrupt wanker can't take the money directly then it just HAS to be a bad idea.

The fundamental issue for me is just how much rain water is wasted by the state governments. Built up areas create massive runoff due to non-porous surfaces like roofs and roads/carparks. All that water generally goes straight down the drain and into the rivers and oceans when it could quite simply be collected and pumped to treatment areas.

Perth saw the problems coming 5-10 years ago and have a de-salination plant so water is not yet an issue. Every other capital is clamping down on water usage but have not yet started to build waste recycling and de-salination plants. Typical Labour governments. Can't find a way to increase revenue so they ignore it.

thats basically the issue.

And we (victoria) voted them in...again. Blame yourselfs.

Jeff would have started numerous projects by now, sure his kick backs would have been his driver...but at least something would have happened by now.

water tanks are Water tanks are already mandatory for new dwellings and most renovations...............

Only 'sort of' correct.....you have the choice of installing a new water tank (min 1000L from memory) OR a solar hot water system in a new dwelling, but one or the other is mandatory. Of course, most go for a water tank as it's cheaper.

We've had 2 water tanks (500L + 1000L) for 10+ years, and I'll be installing another 1000L tank before winter to supply our 2 toilets.

HEY REKIN, just a quick question which is your car in your signiture, the yellow or the black, both look good.

bahahahahaha...what the f......the yellow thing at the back aint a car man...ahhahahaha......

Here is some information on energy/water etc

ENSO, aka, El Nino Southern Oscilation - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ENSO

Nuclear Power Plant - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power_plant

Delsalination plants - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Desalination_plant

As you can see, getting water simply from NZ as mentioned above is not that easy, as the ENSO affects pretty much the entire west pacific, including NZ.

As far as industry using the most water we have available, I agree. But think of it this way. Businesses need to use water to continue to operate. Operation means they make a profit. This profit it paid to employees as salaries. A restriction on water use for many businesses could mean a need to cut costs as they do not have the same output. The best cut in costs is the replacement of people you need to pay, with robots you buy once. This means an increase in the umemployement rate, increase in people on the dole, decrease in living standards for many, angry voters, etc etc etc

The best idea for water management is not desalination, as desalination is the most "oh, no shit thats a good idea" solution but is VERY energy expensive. The recycling of water is the best solution. I hate hearing that poeople say they dont want to wash their cars at commercial car washes because they use recycled water, but trust me when I say this, it is VERY clean water, in many cases more than tap water. Business wont jeapordize themselves using poor quality water. Seriously. Its like macca's using the lowest quality ingredients, they simply dont.

Recycling water is the best because most of the water used isnt even polluted. Think about taking a shower, of the 11L you use a minute, how much is dirty/full of chemicals etc. Even after a shower, its still very clean water.

As far as the person who said that desal plants produce greenhouse gasses, sorry, I dont understand where in the process they do as they pretty much involve the pushing of pressuized water through membranes that filter the water, how does that make greenhouse gasses? Maybe via the use of a lot of energy? Well, that would be solved via the use of Nuclear power.

But you think Nuclear power is bad? Think about it. Its the best solution we have at the moment, and specially in a place like Aus with its crapload of uranium, why WOULDNT we do it. There is a slight risk with meltdowns etc, but this isnt late 80's Russia where you were always out to impress someone. Chernobyl melted down because of beauocracy, not because of Nuclear Power. Nuclear waste is easy to dispose of. Dig a hole, put it in. Sorry but I see this as a MUCH better alternative to the tons and tons of gas being let off in the air with carbon based power generation.

Yeah, solar panels sound like a great idea, but mate do you know how inefficient they are. Its something like the best panels in the world convert 16 or 20% of the solar energy into electricity. Not to mention they are also HELL enpensive. For example, on eBay, for some solar panels, its $4,000 for ~500W of electricty (http://cgi.ebay.com.au/6x-85W-Suntech-Solar-Panel-12V-Huge-510W-System_W0QQitemZ330071867355QQihZ014QQcategoryZ78859QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem). So that means that my $4000 worth of solar panels will light up about 6-10 incandecent globes in my house? Not to mention, I use the electricity at night, meaning I need to pay for the batteries to store all this energy (PS. Big batteries are not cheap).

In my view, the future of energy generation for the short term is Nuclear Power, with Wind generated power being the most feasable. Specially off shore wind farms built on islands in the pacific or something like that. Interesting read -> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wind_power

and here i was thinking chernobly melted down because the backup systems used its own generated power, thus when the main power failed, the backup systems did because they used its own power

Interesting topic this,

Seeing as you can't wash your car at all now even using a pressure washer, I use three buckets or so of bath and shower water through the Karcher and one bucket of fresh water to rinse off.

Having a house on a slab sucks for grey water reclamation.

Use less water where you can.

and here i was thinking chernobly melted down because the backup systems used its own generated power, thus when the main power failed, the backup systems did because they used its own power

Chernobyl did not melt down because it was a random situation where the backup power was needed after an emergency, rather plant operators were conducting a test on the back up generators to make sure they were able to activate in time to support the plant (as previously they were not able to)

During the test, plant operators performed several specific actions that compounded to cause the meltdown of the plant. My earlier reference to 80's Russia was specifically that many of the operators of the plant were not even trained in nuclear stations, safety procedures/features were ignored/turned off during the test, limits were pushed to impress visiting governement officials, etc. Coming from an ex-communisnt eastern european country, its still even evident these days when returning on visits that this mentality is around.

Now lets think about Nuclear power in Australia:

* Properly trained plant management

* Safety procedures stuck to like shit to a blanket

* No need to impress anyone here, everything is done within limits

* Highest quality materials used in manufacturing of plant

* Best materials/supplies used for the running of the plant

* List goes on

So uh, yeh. Nuclear power FTW

Interesting topic this,

Seeing as you can't wash your car at all now even using a pressure washer, I use three buckets or so of bath and shower water through the Karcher and one bucket of fresh water to rinse off.

Having a house on a slab sucks for grey water reclamation.

Use less water where you can.

Thats not a bad idea. How do you run it into the karcher? I was always under the impression that under normal operation water is fed to the karcher via the pressure from the tap...

or does the karcher 'suck' it from a bucket or somthing?

I don't like going to the carwash...

bahahahahaha...what the f......the yellow thing at the back aint a car man...ahhahahaha......

" the yellow thing at the back aint a car man """ no shit sherlock, of course its not a car what do you think this is a planet of bin driving morons, I was being sarcastic in my comments.

Hi All,

On the 23 January 2007, Safeway will be donating its entire

supermarket's profits for the day to the drought relief. The funds

will primarily be used by the CWA for immediate support for rural

families with the remainder to help fund research into sustainable

farming practices. This is expected to be in excess of $3 million

dollars.

So if you do your normal shopping on the 23 January you will be

helping farming families who are currently doing it tough :glare:

http://www.woolworths.com.au/woolworths+ce...ght+reflief.asp

The times they are'a changing.

Basically you can look forward to having to reduce water consumption by something like 80% over the next decade or so. Recycled water will become a part of daily life - Heck City West Water are already running the pipeline for industrial users from Werribee to Altona.

Nuclear Power is the biggest Furphy on energy in a long time. The Switkowski report suggested 25 reactors for Australia by 2025. If we assume there is a population of about 25 million by then this means 1 reactor per 1 million people or about 5 of the beasts for Melbourne. They would have to be near the coast and near the city to be useful - now can you think of any place where they could put them ?? Just look at the hassle they get for a couple of wind turbines - now imagine putting 5 nuclear reactors around Melbourne. Simply won't happen.

Instead we'll be asked to reduce energy consumption (and rightly so) and hopefully we'll all get used to putting some solar panels on the roof.

BTW Looks like the 2008 Prius will have a 'solar roof' to assist in charging a 'plug in' hybrid system.

If you are skeptical on all of this- there is plenty of knowledge out there. It's really an engineering question - how much water is there, how much can we capture therefore how much can we use.

That reminds me, hired a place down Philip Island for NYE and young girls behind the counter reminded me about the "shower with a friend" idea :no: Mav , Bec and I almost made 2 new friends! :)

Hahaha - save water, shower with a friend!!! :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Did this end up working? Did you take some pictures?
    • And finally, the front lower mount. It was doubly weird. Firstly, the lower mount is held in with a bracket that has 3 bolts (it also acts as the steering lock stop), and then a nut on the shock lower mount itself. So, remove the 3x 14mm head bolts , then the 17mm nut that holds the shock in. From there, you can't actually remove the shock from the lower mount bolt (took me a while to work that out....) Sadly I don't have a pic of the other side, but the swaybar mounts to the same bolt that holds the shock in. You need to push that swaybar mount/bolt back so the shock can be pulled out past the lower control arm.  In this pic you can see the bolt partly pushed back, but it had to go further than that to release the shock. Once the shock is out, putting the new one in is "reverse of disassembly". Put the top of the shock through at least one hole and put a nut on loosely to hold it in place. Put the lower end in place and push the swaybar mount / shock bolt back in place, then loosely attach the other 2 top nuts. Bolt the bracket back in place with the 14mm head bolts and finally put the nut onto the lower bolt. Done....you have new suspension on your v37!
    • And now to the front.  No pics of the 3 nuts holding the front struts on, they are easy to spot. Undo 2 and leave the closest one on loosely. Underneath we have to deal with the wiring again, but this time its worse because the plug is behind the guard liner. You'll have to decide how much of the guard liner to remove, I undid the lower liner's top, inside and lower clips, but didn't pull it full off the guard. Same issue undoing the plug as at the rear, you need to firmly push the release clip from below while equally firmly gripping the plug body and pulling it out of  the socket. I used my fancy electrical disconnect pliers to get in there There is also one clip for the wiring, unlike at the rear I could not get behind it so just had to lever it up and out.....not in great condition to re-use in future.
    • Onto the rear lower shock mount. It's worth starting with a decent degrease to remove 10+ years of road grime, and perhaps also spray a penetrating oil on the shock lower nut. Don't forget to include the shock wiring and plug in the clean.... Deal with the wiring first; you need to release 2 clips where the wiring goes into the bracket (use long nose pliers behind the bracket to compress the clip so you can reuse it), and the rubber mount slides out, then release the plug.  I found it very hard to unplug, from underneath you can compress the tab with a screwdriver or similar, and gently but firmly pull the plug out of the socket (regular pliers may help but don't put too much pressure on the plastic. The lower mount is straightforward, 17mm nut and you can pull the shock out. As I wasn't putting a standard shock back in, I gave the car side wiring socket a generous gob of dialectric grease to keep crap out in the future. Putting the new shock in is straightforward, feed it into at least 1 of the bolt holes at the top and reach around to put a nut on it to hold it up. Then put on the other 2 top nuts loosely and put the shock onto the lower mounting bolt (you may need to lift the hub a little if the new shock is shorter). Tighten the lower nut and 3 upper nuts and you are done. In my case the BC Racing shocks came assembled for the fronts, but the rears needed to re-use the factory strut tops. For that you need spring compressors to take the pressure off the top nut (they are compressed enough when the spring can move between the top and bottom spring seats. Then a 17mm ring spanner to undo the nut while using an 8mm open spanner to stop the shaft turning (or, if you are really lucky you might get it off with a rattle gun).
    • You will now be able to lift the parcel shelf trim enough to get to the shock cover bolts; if you need to full remove the parcel shelf trim for some reason you also remove the escutcheons around the rear seat release and you will have to unplug the high stop light wiring from the boot. Next up is removal of the bracket; 6 nuts and a bolt Good news, you've finally got to the strut top! Remove the dust cover and the 3 shock mount nuts (perhaps leave 1 on lightly for now....) Same on the other side, but easier now you've done it all before
×
×
  • Create New...