Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey Ladies and Gents (mostly Gents),

I was hanging out with some mates the other night when we saw a very sexual R32 pass by that sounded somewhat more impressive than the usual.

I was told by someone "in the know" that the car had been upgraded to an S15 SR20DET engine from the standard R32 RB20DET engine.

Questions:

- Is this actually doable?

- Does the SR drop straight in or are there hardcore modifications to do?

- Can you buy SR engines by themselves? If so, where from (if known)?

- Would the R32 drivetrain withstand an SR upgrade (being that I understand the SR to be more powerful)?

- Am I massively ill-informed?

- If this is not do-able, what would be the cheapest/most cost effective engine upgrade?

I am soon to be owning one of these fine machines (R32 GTS-t) and I would seriously consider financing the upgrade if it's possible and feasable to be done.

Any answers would be greatly appreciated.

Adam

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/153788-engine-conversion-question/
Share on other sites

Its been done heaps before mate.

There is a bit of mucking around to get it right... You would be better off dropping a RB25DET into the R32 and be done with it..

The standard r32 drive train would be fine except for the manual gearbox's are allways the weak point in a R32.

Go the rb25det much better conversion IMO

Its definitely do-able...but i see one problem with your first post...a sr20det sounds more impressive than a rb20det? seems to me that theres something not quite right there...

Edited by limpus

Yeh, i agree on that, rb20 sound is far nicer than the sr20 sound

You also have to consider which model sr20 you want because there are different models from different years. It's a same-sized engine and if it's the same year as an rb20 i'd be expecting it to put out less power not more :(. The new ones are nice though if that's what your looking at, people mod the crap out of them and they handle it well, but then why upgrade to a silvia engine when u can drop a rb25 in the same space as your old rb20 fit, easily, and have an extra half a litre of displacement + shedloads of torque

Yeh, i agree on that, rb20 sound is far nicer than the sr20 sound

You also have to consider which model sr20 you want because there are different models from different years. It's a same-sized engine and if it's the same year as an rb20 i'd be expecting it to put out less power not more :(. The new ones are nice though if that's what your looking at, people mod the crap out of them and they handle it well, but then why upgrade to a silvia engine when u can drop a rb25 in the same space as your old rb20 fit, easily, and have an extra half a litre of displacement + shedloads of torque

I'm not really a fan of an SR but i have to admit that they do produce the numbers too...they also do have more torque than the rb20...

Screwball...the question is...why do u want to change it to an SR? is it because it sounds "better"? because thats probably wrong...if its because u want to improve the handling and weight distribution...perhaps...if you want to be different...don't bother because its been done several times...and if its just because u want an SR...then don't destroy a perfectly good 32 and buy a silvia instead...

it is doeable without to much hassle actually. it is a common sidegrade with cefiro owners who want to drift.

I have driven 2 cefiros with SR20s and about 4 with rb20's and the sr is better for drift and low down torque.

talk to "to much boost" on the silviansw forums, he is a knowlagable bloke who has don the conversion hiself. he would be able to give you an exact rundown on what is needed and the cost. his is a very tidy job and performed very well

Cheers

The reason I've looked into it is because I did like the sound of the engine but on top of that I've been told the RB's of that era tend to fail a bit, on top of that I would like a newer age SR (from say an S15 Silvia) which puts out better power figures but also is going to be better on fuel (a moot point in the quest for power obviously but still say-able :() and more resilient, I'm told.

I figure an engine made in 1999 or whatever will be much more reliable and economic than one made in 1990.

How much would someone like me expect to pay for an SR20DET from an early model S15 with reasonable k's? How does this compare with the cost of a low k's RB25DET?

it is doeable without to much hassle actually. it is a common sidegrade with cefiro owners who want to drift.

I have driven 2 cefiros with SR20s and about 4 with rb20's and the sr is better for drift and low down torque.

talk to "to much boost" on the silviansw forums, he is a knowlagable bloke who has don the conversion hiself. he would be able to give you an exact rundown on what is needed and the cost. his is a very tidy job and performed very well

Cheers

I helped with the above and did most of the wiring work on it. Very straight forward conversion.

In a nut shell, you will need the engine, loom, gearbox and engine cross member so you may as well buy a half cut. You are better off with an s14 engine which is pretty much identical to s15 as it has the stronger box and will fit up with the stock manual r32 tailshaft.

On the cef i think we used an s15 rack and cross member as he had one in good condition but the tie rods had to be swapped for s13 items to get enough adjustment to straighten up the wheels. Minor mods to the gear box crossmember (elongated holes) and a bit of minor chopping of the hole in the floor for the gear stick as it sat further back i think.

Clutch master had to be swapped for an s14 item to clear the back of the sr plenum and hicas was removed completely as he used the sr power steering pump/rack which didn't have provision for the hicas and it was already locked anyway.

I was considering this swap into my r32 but figured the extra .5L out of an rb25 was a better idea. It was.

I'm just suprised that you were impressed by the sound and thats what made you think something different was going on. striaght six always sounds better than a 4 cyl imo. But yeh has been done. i'd go the rb25 route.

Ok so what is needed for an RB20 to RB25 conversion? Do I need an R33 gearbox too or will it all hook up?

I'm only planning to do ECU remap, FMIC and zorst to start with, so will I need upgraded box from the word go?

Thanks for the help guys.

i think the s15 sr is quite dear in price..the rb25 would the best option plus cheaper as the front cut would be as dear plus ya get even better box again..

rb sound way better than sr 4 bangers

The 25 will fit up to the 20 box. You just need an engine, loom and ecu. You use the 20 engine mounts, AC compressor and power steering pump. The rest just fits up to your existing dump pipe, intake pipes and the like.

The 20 box is under rated. Mine is still happy at 288rwkw, though i'm swapping to a 25 box now as it's only a matter of time before it dies.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...