Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I hope Andrew doesn't mind but I've attached a comparison of his and AM's.

Andrews at the time of the dyno run was running 260dur Poncams, ~19psi, 3.5" exhaust, ebc, stock exh mani and plenum.

AM's stock rb25de cams and 2 3/4" exhaust, stock exh mani and aftermarket plenum and less boost ~17psi with no ebc and a little valve float starting to develop (lump curve)

The poncams bring boost on earlier and really pump up that mid range, not to mention its running more boost so that too pumps up the mid.

It shall be interesting what happens to AM's once boost is pushed up, possibly cams and an ebc to hold that gate shut until the very last ms.

Going by what it looked like when on lower boost levels and slowly raising it up the graph shape stayed the same from around 90-95km/h but the whole thing simply moves up.

post-382-1163662860.jpg

I hope Andrew doesn't mind but I've attached a comparison of his and AM's.

Andrews at the time of the dyno run was running 260dur Poncams, ~19psi, 3.5" exhaust, ebc, stock exh mani and plenum.

AM's stock rb25de cams and 2 3/4" exhaust, stock exh mani and aftermarket plenum and less boost ~17psi with no ebc and a little valve float starting to develop (lump curve)

The poncams bring boost on earlier and really pump up that mid range, not to mention its running more boost so that too pumps up the mid.

It shall be interesting what happens to AM's once boost is pushed up, possibly cams and an ebc to hold that gate shut until the very last ms.

Going by what it looked like when on lower boost levels and slowly raising it up the graph shape stayed the same from around 90-95km/h but the whole thing simply moves up.

Joel,

I think that 306rwkw run is with the stock cams, it made 312rwkw with the cams in. Also i always had a 3" exhaust, was meaning to upgrade to 3.5" but never got around to it.

Any way you can plot Stockys twincharge graph on the graph with ours?, maybe work out RPM and gearing of his car compared to speed of our R32 gts.

ISL33P,

You do a plenum to suit the r32 rb25de?

Something that may require sending in our own inlet manifold to be chopped up or can you sort out that side of things?

The std plenums really do leave the rb30det feeling a bit like a high powered diesel. :P

please pm for any enquiries as i dont want this too appear as a advert for myself this is an info thread and a very popular, not to be used to promote my own interests unlike others out there :/

Discussion is knowledge, knowledge is power and without discussion the ignorant die a long, slow and frustrated life.

Hi Ariel, "experts", I guess that would include me

If you wish to put yourself in that category, feel free to do so, but please change your sig because you do think you know everything ;)

and I have most definitely "tried it", in fact several “its”. They all fail to produce higher average power levels on RB25DET's up to their limit of 7,250 rpm (equivalent airflow to 6,000 rpm in an RB30).

Looking at the dyno graphs I see exactly the same result, lower average power up to 5,750 rpm. This means the standard plenum equipped engine would be faster accelerating from 3,000 rpm to 5,750 rpm in every gear than the aftermarket plenum equipped engine.

Personally, on an RB30 with standard internals, I would much rather have my max power at 5,250 rpm (using the standard plenum), instead of 6,000 rpm (using an aftermarket plenum). After all higher rpm = shorter engine life.

Revs = power and you yourself say the standard plenum causes a restriction which does not help this equation. Engine life comes with a properly prepared engine, you, a self-proclaimed expert should know that

My own rb30, purchased in 1998 with 157,000k’s, went thru a lot and I owned it for 6 yrs, 4 yrs (more than 70,000k’s) at my hands/feet and is still going to this day (to the best of my knowledge) making at least 370rwhp (stopped making power at 6200, the standard factory imposed rev limit) with completely standard internals and it used to get revved, although accidentally during burnouts, racing or a missed gear, to more than 8000rpm but more commonly 7250 rev limited (why so high when it stopped making power at 1000rpm earlier, simply becuase i loved the sound of it revving with the wastegate screaming and so did everyone else :P). Don't know about you, but that's what i call reliability and repeatability, the essence of "engine life".

We have no idea of the comparable atmospheric conditions prevailing on the days that the dyno runs were performed. The dyno runs do not appear to have been carried out in Shoot Out mode by an accredited workshop, hence no atmospheric information is shown. All I have done in the previous post is to comment on the information as supplied.

Sounds like we have a Dyno Dynamics rep on board, how lucky we are :(

Remember that boost is simply a measure of resistance to airflow, lower boost should indicate less resistance. Which I am sure the proponents of aftermarket plenums would quickly lay claim to. Less resistance should lead to higher airflow and higher airflow means more power.

Since we have been told that nothing else was changed, I can only conclude that the aftermarket plenum has less resistance but fails to turn that increased airflow into increased power. Based on the evidence I would maintain that this plenum, like all the others I have tested, has poor distribution which results in the lower power output.

Hence the lower power output is not in fact due to lower boost, but due to poor distribution of the increased airflow. As is common, at higher rpm the aftermarket plenum's poor distrbution becomes less of a problem.

Poor distribution is simply a matter of poor plenum design. Maybe you should try some of the more proven and tested plenums before jumping to conclusions that they all are the same. edit - there are plenty of people out there that claim results, so maybe you should try a few more :)

Edited by ISL33P

Hi Guys, i'm ready to send my block off to get cleaned, crank, rods and pistons done ect.

I just want to make sure that the parts i have are all ok to use and havn't missed anything.

My list is....

32 gtr head on rb30e block.

Forged pistons and rods.

Stock crank rb30

Acl Big and main bearings

Standard rb26dett h/g. or metal one ? Will deck the block to achieve between 8.5 to 9 c/r.

Arp rb25det head studs

N1 oil pump with crank collar

2 x 1.5mm oil restrictors

2 x rb25det knock sensors

rb25det oil pressure sensor

Dayco Timing belt 94407 with two tensioners

rb25det engine mounts, pullys and tensioner. + 1 for above the water pump

I'll then build it up with reference to cubes's pdf file.

Sorry for going though all this but theres so many pages to read.

I'm at 66 at the moment :P

Thanks again, Simon.

and you said your going with two 1.5mm restrictors for the 26 head when std they have one 2mm restrictor. Your actually encouraging more oil to goto the head then std. Stick with the one 1.5 hey and leave the back one blocked off....or is it the front one?

Bl4cK32.... which pump would be best then? It wont see the track too much.

will the stock rb25det oil pump sufice?

r33_racer... sorry one x 1.5 oil restrictor. :huh:

Does any know which one should have the restrictor in it?

Thanks for the help, Simon.

Edited by handyandy

u'll be fine with the rb25 pump, just get it checked to see if it's fine, and it mite pay to put a 'collar' on the crank for that extra bit of drive for the oil pump

rb's have a tendancy to wash oil up the back of the head, so would it be best to block off the rear one?

got a pic of the oil pump mods done so far for the dry sump setup. We used a slightly modified rb25 front head return as our main feed with -10 fittings, coincidently the std return has the same id as -10 so it worked out well. We cut the top off the oil pump and i tigged up the hole. Quite abit of stuffing around checking belt clearance, damper clearance, swaybar and the rest...but it looks like it will work. The cut down aircon bracket to hold the pump. I will post better pics when it is fully finished. It just needs some tags to pick up the adjusting bolt for the slide tensioning if you get what i mean.

post-12828-1163864964.jpg

post-12828-1163865510.jpg

Sounds like we have a Dyno Dynamics rep on board, how lucky we are :O

Poor distribution is simply a matter of poor plenum design. Maybe you should try some of the more proven and tested plenums before jumping to conclusions that they all are the same. edit - there are plenty of people out there that claim results, so maybe you should try a few more :rofl:

Nope, my comment was simply in relation to atmospheric conditions for the dyno runs comparisons, not an add for DD.

Based on the evidence supplied, my conclusioin is that this particular penum has poor distribution. If you have evidence to the contrary please post it up.

I am willing and able to test ANY plenum at any time on the car and/or on the flow bench, plenty of guys have taken me up on that. So far I haven't found one single aftermarket plenum that makes higher average power on an RB25 cylinder head up to 300 rwkw.

Please feel free to send me a plenum at any time and I will test it and publish the results. If it produces higher average power, then I will gladly pay you for it. If it produces lower average power then you can pay me for the labour to R&R it.

Over to you

:no: cheers :wave:

SK,

Please don't take offence at anything I say I'm just trying to get my head around where you are coming from as to myself its as clear as day the wider power band is considerably better than a peaky one even though it 'may' loose a little through the mid range.

But first...

I'm curious how you tell it has poor distribution when the car clearly had a little boost control issue prior to the plenum and after the plenum ign wasn't tuned to suit. There was no boost controller connected so the external wastegate should have held boost perfectly to start off with, not spike up then tail off.

Possibly an issue some where else that was accidentally sorted when reworking i/c piping etc.

The plenum was simply dropped on, afr's set back to 12:1 due to it running larger 800cc twin sprays (no ign tweaking) and a power run performed.

Either way I really do believe its worth while for the RB30DET running a GT35r even when running the lower 8psi and making under 200rwkw. I have no results with one running a gt30r so I can't conclude.

Consider...

The rpm drops between gears, selecting the next gear your going to be in more power with a wider power band.

A narrow power band that may make more power earlier will no doubt be quicker accelerating out of a corner in a given gear but those benefits are over once that car selects the next gear as they will drop to say 160rwkw then have to build up where as one with the wider power band may only drop to 240rwkw then build up to 270rwkw. So a much greater average power for the given gear ratio's which should translate to quicker 0-100 and quicker 1/4 times.

The car with the narrow power band will also loose out at higher road speeds, possibly resulting in lower TS 1/4 speeds.

Hope that made sense. :O

EDIT: We really need some results with a GT30r. From what I've seen before the GT30r .82 tends to fall over a touch before 6000rpm at 1bar ~250rwkw with power flattening off from around mid 4000rpm.

Should this be just the turbo being a touch small on the hot side or not has yet to be seen. Without flicking back posts the dude who runs GT30r on his Rb30DET with a plenum please take note of where it makes its power. If power extends up close to 7000rpm without flattening off majorly then awesome.

Edited by Cubes

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Any update on this one? did you manage to get it fixed?    i'm having the same issue with my r34 and i believe its to do with the smart entry (keyless) control module but cant be sure without forking out to get a replacement  
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if something was binding the shaft from rotating properly. I got absolutely no voltage reading out of the sensor no matter how fast I turned the shaft. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • So this being my first contribution to the SAU forums, I'd like to present and show how I had to solve probably one of the most annoying fixes on any car I've owned: replacing a speedometer (or "speedo") sensor on my newly acquired Series 1 Stagea 260RS Autech Version. I'm simply documenting how I went about to fix this issue, and as I understand it is relatively rare to happen to this generation of cars, it is a gigantic PITA so I hope this helps serve as reference to anyone else who may encounter this issue. NOTE: Although I say this is meant for the 260RS, because the gearbox/drivetrain is shared with the R33 GTR with the 5-speed manual, the application should be exactly the same. Background So after driving my new-to-me Stagea for about 1500km, one night while driving home the speedometer and odometer suddenly stopped working. No clunking noise, no indication something was broken, the speedometer would just stop reading anything and the odometer stopped going up. This is a huge worry for me, because my car is relatively low mileage (only 45k km when purchased) so although I plan to own the car for a long time, a mismatched odometer reading would be hugely detrimental to resale should the day come to sell the car. Thankfully this only occurred a mile or two from home so it wasn't extremely significant. Also, the OCD part of me would be extremely irked if the numbers that showed on my dash doesn't match the actual ageing of the car. Diagnosing I had been in communication with the well renown GTR shop in the USA, U.P.garage up near University Point in Washington state. After some back and forth they said it could be one of two things: 1) The speedometer sensor that goes into the transfer case is broken 2) The actual cluster has a component that went kaput. They said this is common in older Nissan gauge clusters and that would indicate a rebuild is necessary. As I tried to figure out if it was problem #1, I resolved problem #2 by sending my cluster over to Relentless Motorsports in Dallas, TX, whom is local to me and does cluster and ECU rebuilds. He is a one man operation who meticulously replaces every chip, resistor, capacitor, and electronic component on the PCB's on a wide variety of classic and modern cars. His specialty is Lexus and Toyota, but he came highly recommended by Erik of U.P.garage since he does the rebuilds for them on GTR clusters.  For those that don't know, on R32 and R33 GTR gearboxes, the speedometer sensor is mounted in the transfer case and is purely an analog mini "generator" (opposite of an alternator essentially). Based on the speed the sensor spins it generates an AC sine wave voltage up to 5V, and sends that via two wires up to the cluster which then interprets it via the speedometer dial. The signal does NOT go to the ECU first, the wiring goes to the cluster first then the ECU after (or so I'm told).  Problems/Roadblocks I first removed the part from the car on the underside of the transfer case (drain your transfer case fluid/ATF first, guess who found out that the hard way?), and noted the transfer case fluid was EXTREMELY black, most likely never changed on my car. When attempting to turn the gears it felt extremely gritty, as if shttps://imgur.com/6TQCG3xomething was binding the shaft from rotating properly. After having to reflow the solder on my AFM sensors based on another SAU guide here, I attempted to disassemble the silicone seal on the back of the sensor to see what happened inside the sensor; turns out, it basically disintegrated itself. Wonderful. Not only had the electrical components destroyed themselves, the magnetic portion on what I thought was on the shaft also chipped and was broken. Solution So solution: find a spare part right? Wrong. Nissan has long discontinued the proper sensor part number 32702-21U19, and it is no longer obtainable either through Nissan NSA or Nissan Japan. I was SOL without proper speed or mileage readings unless I figured out a way to replace this sensor. After tons of Googling and searching on SAU, I found that there IS however a sensor that looks almost exactly like the R33/260RS one: a sensor meant for the R33/R34 GTT and GTS-T with the 5 speed manual. The part number was 25010-21U00, and the body, plug, and shaft all looked exactly the same. The gear was different at the end, but knowing the sensor's gear is held on with a circlip, I figured I could just order the part and swap the gears. Cue me ordering a new part from JustJap down in Kirrawee, NSW, then waiting almost 3 weeks for shipping and customs clearing. The part finally arrives and what did I find? The freaking shaft lengths don't match. $&%* I discussed with Erik how to proceed, and figuring that I basically destroyed the sensor trying to get the shaft out of the damaged sensor from my car. we deemed it too dangerous to try and attempt to swap shafts to the correct length. I had to find a local CNC machinist to help me cut and notch down the shaft. After tons of frantic calling on a Friday afternoon, I managed to get hold of someone and he said he'd be able to do it over half a week. I sent him photos and had him take measurements to match not only the correct length and notch fitment, but also a groove to machine out to hold the retentive circlip. And the end result? *chef's kiss* Perfect. Since I didn't have pliers with me when I picked up the items, I tested the old gear and circlip on. Perfect fit. After that it was simply swapping out the plug bracket to the new sensor, mount it on the transfer case, refill with ATF/Nissan Matic Fluid D, then test out function. Thankfully with the rebuilt cluster and the new sensor, both the speedometer and odometer and now working properly!   And there you have it. About 5-6 weeks of headaches wrapped up in a 15 minute photo essay. As I was told it is rare for sensors of this generation to die so dramatically, but you never know what could go wrong with a 25+ year old car. I HOPE that no one else has to go through this problem like I did, so with my take on a solution I hope it helps others who may encounter this issue in the future. For the TL;DR: 1) Sensor breaks. 2) Find a replacement GTT/GTS-T sensor. 3) Find a CNC machinist to have you cut it down to proper specs. 4) Reinstall then pray to the JDM gods.   Hope this guide/story helps anyone else encountering this problem!
    • perhaps i should have mentioned, I plugged the unit in before i handed over to the electronics repair shop to see what damaged had been caused and the unit worked (ac controls, rear demister etc) bar the lights behind the lcd. i would assume that the diode was only to control lighting and didnt harm anything else i got the unit back from the electronics repair shop and all is well (to a point). The lights are back on and ac controls are working. im still paranoid as i beleive the repairer just put in any zener diode he could find and admitted asking chatgpt if its compatible   i do however have another issue... sometimes when i turn the ignition on, the climate control unit now goes through a diagnostics procedure which normally occurs when you disconnect and reconnect but this may be due to the below   to top everything off, and feel free to shoot me as im just about to do it myself anyway, while i was checking the newly repaired board by plugging in the climate control unit bare without the housing, i believe i may have shorted it on the headunit surround. Climate control unit still works but now the keyless entry doesnt work along with the dome light not turning on when you open the door. to add to this tricky situation, when you start the car and remove the key ( i have a turbo timer so car remains on) the keyless entry works. the dome light also works when you switch to the on position. fuses were checked and all ok ive deduced that the short somehow has messed with the smart entry control module as that is what controls the keyless entry and dome light on door opening   you guys wouldnt happen to have any experience with that topic lmao... im only laughing as its all i can do right now my self diagnosed adhd always gets me in a situation as i have no patience and want to get everything done in shortest amount of time as possible often ignoring crucial steps such as disconnecting battery when stuffing around with electronics or even placing a simple rag over the metallic headunit surround when placing a live pcb board on top of it   FML
    • Bit of a pity we don't have good images of the back/front of the PCB ~ that said, I found a YT vid of a teardown to replace dicky clock switches, and got enough of a glimpse to realize this PCB is the front-end to a connected to what I'll call PCBA, and as such this is all digital on this PCB..ergo, battery voltage probably doesn't make an appearance here ; that is, I'd expect them to do something on PCBA wrt power conditioning for the adjustment/display/switch PCB.... ....given what's transpired..ie; some permutation of 12vdc on a 5vdc with or without correct polarity...would explain why the zener said "no" and exploded. The transistor Q5 (M33) is likely to be a digital switching transistor...that is, package has builtin bias resistors to ensure it saturates as soon as base threshold voltage is reached (minimal rise/fall time)....and wrt the question 'what else could've fried?' ....well, I know there's an MCU on this board (display, I/O at a guess), and you hope they isolated it from this scenario...I got my crayons out, it looks a bit like this...   ...not a lot to see, or rather, everything you'd like to see disappears down a via to the other side...base drive for the transistor comes from somewhere else, what this transistor is switching is somewhere else...but the zener circuit is exclusive to all this ~ it's providing a set voltage (current limited by the 1K3 resistor R19)...and disappears somewhere else down the via I marked V out ; if the errant voltage 'jumped' the diode in the millisecond before it exploded, whatever that V out via feeds may have seen a spike... ....I'll just imagine that Q5 was switched off at the time, thus no damage should've been done....but whatever that zener feeds has to be checked... HTH
×
×
  • Create New...