Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The tuners still have our car...been there all week. Car wont make more power then about 290rwkws and it keeps overboosting once it reaches its target boost. They have been playing with timing, and wastegate springs....they think the problem is a faulty gate, which is sticking or something...so another is coming from turbosmart which will hopefully clear it up.

Initial thought after playing with wg springs was that the timing was out a few degrees, as in piston was not tdc when we set it up...But now the blame has been shifted back to the wastegate. Hopefully it gets sorted cause races are next weekend. Car still needs a wheel alignment.

R33 Racer- What size wastegate you using?

48mm turbosmart progate....the exact one we used previously on the old motor before it died.

The only different things on this new motor is the dry sump system, gt3540 0.82a/r, 4" exhaust system, oh and not that it matters but argo rods(previously ran rev)....so it went from making 370rwkws to 290rwkws.

with 8.5 to 1 what does a compression test come out at? mine has 120 in each cyl and i was wondering what it was.

comp ratio is 8.5:1

had several bolt on probs previously to this run, which I ve recently sorted, bent plenum, fuel pump issues.

But fixed all those, new 044 pump etc. No leaks, A/F ratios all good now.

I agree cubes, I told Matt that this Friday to boost it until it pings :-) , as the engine will handle near enough what ever we put into it.

Ill be running 100 octane and I wont be happy if it doesnt make some serious power.

And if it doesnt Im not sure where to look as Ive pretty much sorted every other issue that has come along.

Feel free to suggest anything - because at 10 psi I really thought it would be making more power, I guess if I pump 25 psi in on a proper tune it might make what Im looking for....but who knows until Ive done it

I dont think compression ratio and compression pressure have a direct relationship. As there are many variables that effect compression pressure, ring end gap, bore wear, ring wear, valve to seat seal etc.

So you can have two engines with 8.5:1 but both have different compression pressures.

This might be a silly place to ask i dont know, but what motor would best suit a r32 gtst with standard diff ratio (4.3)

I have a standard bore rb30 bottom end waiting to be built into a 3.1 but always wonder if i would be better off with a 2.6,7 or 8.

Both motors would be fully built with 9.0:1 comp ratios

Thanks guys

r33 racer what diff ratio are u running and how do u find it etc.

just after some info

want to run forged pistons with approx 9:1 comp ratio

and fit oil squirters

can i buy rb30 pistons or will i have to use rb25 with oil squirter cut outs

why bother with the oil squirters when people in the know ahve said u dont need them?

to quote a very repuitable shop, RIPS, taken from ww.gtr.co.uk:

Originally Posted by Sayajin

How difficult is it to put the RB26 oil squirters into the RIPPS RB30 block? Is it even necessary with forged internals?

Originally Posted by RIPS

Not required. No piston failiers, ever.

I installed the new wastegate springs in the HKS gate on Sunday. Hooked all back up and went for a drive and it was still only making .7 bar. So I turned off the AVCR, still only .7 bar. Then I plumbed the wastegate up straight to a boost source, so it had nothing to do with the AVCR, still only .7 bar. Getting a little annoyed by this time, so I totally disconnected everything to the gate. Thought I would go for a very cautious drive to see if this gate was working at all. Full revs still only .7 bar, so Im guessing ( havent had a chance to remove it ) that the valve is either not seating on the seat, or its stuck open.

There are no leaks in the intake side as I pressure tested it again yesterday.

Any thoughts on other reasons for no boost ?

yeah they finally released it, actually useful data for once

pitty it needs to much damn turbine speed to get anything useful from it

whats a realistic rpm we are talking to get a 0.70 a/r housing fast enough to make the compressor flow 1.5 bar. is there a way to mathematically work this out?

given that we know required turbine speed and pressure ratio ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...