Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

urgent help needed pls guys!

my 30 blocks all finished and prepped and i should be recieving a call sometime tomorow when my vvt 33 heads ready to be picked up after welding the vvt feed and slight mod to water gallery to suit the 30block. however while my heads there i thought i may aswell get the head specialist to tap the vvt oil feed in the head.

MY PROBLEM, i dont know excatly where to tell him to do it. can someone PLEASE provide me with some detailed pics both close up and from a distance aswell as some measurments of location so i can get this done. also some info on the sizes adaptor and fitting etc.

ANOTHER issue i have is once oil is supplied to the vvt via the extrenal feed does it need to drain off anywhere?? if so where and how??

ideally i need this info tonight so i can pass the info on tomoro.

i have attached pics of the vvt oil feed i have but cant make it out i need more pics/info.

HELP ME PLS!

urgent help needed pls guys!

my 30 blocks all finished and prepped and i should be recieving a call sometime tomorow when my vvt 33 heads ready to be picked up after welding the vvt feed and slight mod to water gallery to suit the 30block. however while my heads there i thought i may aswell get the head specialist to tap the vvt oil feed in the head.

MY PROBLEM, i dont know excatly where to tell him to do it. can someone PLEASE provide me with some detailed pics both close up and from a distance aswell as some measurments of location so i can get this done. also some info on the sizes adaptor and fitting etc.

ANOTHER issue i have is once oil is supplied to the vvt via the extrenal feed does it need to drain off anywhere?? if so where and how??

ideally i need this info tonight so i can pass the info on tomoro.

i have attached pics of the vvt oil feed i have but cant make it out i need more pics/info.

HELP ME PLS!

post-23187-1172569882.jpg

post-23187-1172570105.jpg

post-23187-1172570445.jpg

the rb25 vct head has a drain on the exhaust side that it uses for the extra oil fed in.

use a 1/8th fitting

pic of where it is normally put

remember to setup the additional oil drain ont he exhaust side in the sump for this head return.

all pics were taken from this thread btw

post-5157-1172571321.jpg

post-5157-1172571334.jpg

post-5157-1172571489.jpg

post-5157-1172571502.jpg

thanx for info/pics of feed into vvt, i think ill be able to sort that out now.

however i dont completely understand the vvt oil drain part. can you explain it in rb30det for dummies language/pics.

"remember to setup the additional oil drain ont he exhaust side in the sump for this head return"

so do i tap into the head again for teh drain (where do i do this) ?? and run this into the sump somewhere.

thanx for info/pics of feed into vvt, i think ill be able to sort that out now.

however i dont completely understand the vvt oil drain part. can you explain it in rb30det for dummies language/pics.

"remember to setup the additional oil drain ont he exhaust side in the sump for this head return"

so do i tap into the head again for teh drain (where do i do this) ?? and run this into the sump somewhere.

rb25det head already has an oil drain about 15-20mm forward from the exhaust port for cylinder 1.

you need to run the drain line off that flange down and into the sump, so you need a fitting on the sump to accept this line

as you can see in the picture below, it is the gold line infront (left) of the exhaust shield.

post-5157-1172573842.jpg

GOT HIM!

thanx a lot dude for your help i think youve answered all my questions.

would it be possible to use speedflow fittings and a brainded oil line on the intake side for the vvt feed instead of that one pictured in teh above pics??? what im tryna say is is there a reason for using that piece of tube for teh feed??

nope, can run either the solid tube or braided lines.

use speedflow if you have the cash, if not std gas type fittings that are used in the pics

that isnt my setup above, i think personally from what i have read, that a seperate return that is seperate from the turbo oil drain is a wise idea due to the amount of frothy oil that comes down out of the turbo, but its all up to you

hmm thats something to think about.. use same return as turbo or tap a new one into the sump?? has teh pros and cons to both set ups been covered over the thousand pages lol?? if not please inform me briefly.

also HEAD STUDS.

ill be using aftermarket head studs probably arp, however which ones do i buy??? rb30, rb25, ive heard that your meant to use 26 ones.

which stud is the correct one to use??

Only $360 for the ARP ones :happy:

30 block needs to be tapped n drilled, 25 head needs drilling to fit the thicker studs.

Not a cheap exercise.

http://www.modyourcar.com.au/product_info....roducts_id=3415

$449 bucks for rb26

http://www.tweakit.net/shop/index.php?cPath=57_51_657

$275 for rb25

hold on a minute, are you saying the arp head studs are not a direct fit into the rb30det which uses rb25 head??
no to use rb26 head studs on a 25 head u need to drill the block/head to suit

rb20/25/30 are all the same type 12mm and 26 are 13mm from memory

you just need to source 25 ones :wub:

think the rb25 and rb30 are 11mm - rb26 is 12mm and chev rods are 1/2 inch

Stock RB26 head studs are only $10 ea so $140 a set from Nissan.

Sorry to be going so fast. I NEED to drive this home to Brisbane Saturday, or mostly to get out of Victoria. :happy:

All slow now. Fabricating the stuff to make it fit like induction and throttle cable mount and injector loom. Still to mount oil cooler and need more silicone hose and clamps.

RB25 and 26 have the same TPS plug and Bosch injector plugs (RB30) are $7 at Bursons and a straight fit for 26 injectors. Wired 10ohm 15W resistors in line with the injector loom to match the impedance of the RB25 injectors.

Yes R33Racer I agree , RB25DET/inlet has limits . I wondered for a while if there's any value in using an R34 25DET head on a decent RB25 or 30DET because it gets you into a mechanical valve train though I'm not sure if RB26 cams (aftermarket) interchange . SK tells me that porting wise the 26 is different and impossible to emulate without fabrication . The big issue is that the marketing geniuses at Nissan made very sure they would piss EVERYONE off by not making the manifold patterns common on all DOHC RB heads . To get a mechanical train its R34 25 or RB26 . To get the gun inlet system its only RB26 and then its aftermarket for a single turbo exhaust manifold . You don't really have any choise , if the hydraulic lifters don't limit you the inlet system will . Its a hateful situation but the answer is to bite the bullet or get painted into a corner . Its not all bad though , someone out there should have a use for your RB25 top end .

Cheers A .

yeh id hope so...but we gotta get this new motor making some power first before we even think of doing anything else. Dyno tomorrow arvo for power run to see if we fixed the problem of no power!

But i should start looking around for a busted rb26 or atleast a complete 26 head.

RB26 cams are a direct fit into the R34 head ( after setting the shims etc ) - I am using HKS 272 / 9.35mm cams in mine.

Performance springs make spring and retainer kits for the NEO now also. Also the intake manifold stud pattern on the R33 and R34 are the same as Im using std R33 runners with the CPC plenum - just thought Id mention that.

Yes R33Racer I agree , RB25DET/inlet has limits . I wondered for a while if there's any value in using an R34 25DET head on a decent RB25 or 30DET because it gets you into a mechanical valve train though I'm not sure if RB26 cams (aftermarket) interchange . SK tells me that porting wise the 26 is different and impossible to emulate without fabrication . The big issue is that the marketing geniuses at Nissan made very sure they would piss EVERYONE off by not making the manifold patterns common on all DOHC RB heads . To get a mechanical train its R34 25 or RB26 . To get the gun inlet system its only RB26 and then its aftermarket for a single turbo exhaust manifold . You don't really have any choise , if the hydraulic lifters don't limit you the inlet system will . Its a hateful situation but the answer is to bite the bullet or get painted into a corner . Its not all bad though , someone out there should have a use for your RB25 top end .

Cheers A .

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...