Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just got a quick question or 2 :mellow:

will intercooler piping that fits a rb26 engine fit a rb30/26 setup in the same car? or will i have to extend the pipes the 40mm or so?

can i run the rb30 size head bolts with a 26 head? (this is a throw together engine while i build my other engine on the side so i dont care how long it lasts so if i can get away with 30 sized bolts that would be good)

Edited by overpowered
Gary- The design is a fair compromise for room to make fit as i wanted to low mount the GT35. I wasnt too sure how well the wastegate pipes would work (again clearance limited) but it will run as low as 14-15psi boost. Im using a Blitz dual SBC to boost up to 17psi via the bottom port only, when i try and increase the boost more than this via the conrtller i get problems with unstable boost.

Im only running a 11psi spring in the gate, would this be the problem?? I have a 15psi spring to try.

I don't think you would have to change the external dimensions 1 mm. All you need to do is extend the collector away from the flange. All 6 cylinders have to have flowing access to the wastegate pipe.

The LOWER the boost, the BETTER the wastegate has to work. It has to allow MORE exhaust gas to bypass the turbine. Higher boost means less exhaust needs to be bypassed.

So, I don't think that the spring change will help much in controlling boost in this case.

:P cheers :dry:

just got a quick question or 2 :huh:

will intercooler piping that fits a rb26 engine fit a rb30/26 setup in the same car? or will i have to extend the pipes the 40mm or so?

can i run the rb30 size head bolts with a 26 head? (this is a throw together engine while i build my other engine on the side so i dont care how long it lasts so if i can get away with 30 sized bolts that would be good)

There is usually enough flex in the pipwork and length in the silicone joiners to accomodate the extra 38 mm of height.

RB20/25/30 head bolts are 11mm and RB26 are 12mm, despite the presence of locators, I would be reluctant to leave 1/2mm of float around the head bolts.

:P cheers :dry:

I've decided my RB20 is no longer going to cut it and I'm keen on breaking my engine building cherry :P

The basic plan is a RB25DE head with GTR valve springs and a standard RB30e bottom end. The car (R32 GTS-T) already has a RB25DET box :kiss:

Just so I'm under no disillusions before I start to collect parts -

Can a non rebuilt RB30E bottom end be expected to last at 270-300rwkw?

Is a metal head gasket and o-ringing a requirement for this kind of power with some reliability?

Can I skim the head (RB25DE/DET) a little to raise the compression closer to mid 8's without upsetting the quench zones? Likewise skimming the block to run a zero deck height?

Is it worth replacing the bearings and rings to after market items or will something else break first (rods?) making it a waste of money?

Will I need after market head studs like ARP's or will OEM do for this kind of power?

I think thats about it... :P

I know a lot of the reliability has to do with tuning but stock parts only last so long before they let go at high power levels. I'd honestly be happy with a responsive 250rwkw from a 'on the cheap' RB30 build but 300rwkw is my goal and probably the absolute limit for a R32 GTS-T anyway. I could probably do it from an RB25 but I want the extra torque to make a bit of a motorkharna weapon :)

Thanks in advance for the advice

Frost no doubt someone will confirm/deny but I think all RB26 valve train components are unique dimensions . Your call but the head will most probably make/break the final result . R33 and 34 RB25 heads have larger ports than R32 RB25DE and I would think R33 RB25DE heads would not be very expensive anyway . I can't see why it wouldn't be possible to not use VVT with a 33 DE head plus you'll need springs anyway . I dont think the weld mod to the water jacket would be expensive .

Just my 2c , cheers A .

Frost no doubt someone will confirm/deny but I think all RB26 valve train components are unique dimensions . Your call but the head will most probably make/break the final result . R33 and 34 RB25 heads have larger ports than R32 RB25DE and I would think R33 RB25DE heads would not be very expensive anyway . I can't see why it wouldn't be possible to not use VVT with a 33 DE head plus you'll need springs anyway . I dont think the weld mod to the water jacket would be expensive .

Just my 2c , cheers A .

seeing as its going into a 32 your better off sticking with 32 25de head! Makes everything easier.

ok here are the sheets.

Just got back from first day of the first round of the state championship round at QR. Was good, but I was expecting more cars to be there...seems alot of people pulled out at the last minute....odd.

post-12828-1174724807.jpg

post-12828-1174724781.jpg

We need a good boost controller. And a better setup suspension.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...