Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How many ponies did it produce?

500 before it blew the welsche plug out, hasnt had full tune done since

How could that happen, unless the joiner is before the turbo (intake pipe)?

yeh intake pipe, the blue 90deg one in the pic

thatpipeih9.th.jpg

Has anyone seen a low mount tubalar manifold with external gate? I already have height clearances issues and am afraid a high mount manifold will exacerbate the problem :(

I realise that external gate on low mount will be pushing it for clearance down there but thought someone out there might have come up with a manifold design I can buy off the shelf :P

Has anyone seen a low mount tubalar manifold with external gate? I already have height clearances issues and am afraid a high mount manifold will exacerbate the problem :D

I realise that external gate on low mount will be pushing it for clearance down there but thought someone out there might have come up with a manifold design I can buy off the shelf ;)

Clearance on a low mount is not the only problem, you also have to consider accessibility of the bolts/nuts/hoses/etc for installation/fitment.

I really wanted a low mount manifold, but once i starting thinking about installation, etc. i decided to go high mount. Most high mount manifolds (if built properly) would have the turbo sitting below the level of the cam covers, so i don't think clearance is an issue; unless you're fitting a 800+hp turbo.

Only looking at fitting a GT35R and by clearance I meant for everything.. including ratchet and spanner access :P

The majority of the manifolds I have found when looking about have the turbo sitting a good couple of inches above the cam cover. If anyone knows of any specific high mount manifolds that aren't too high.. please, enlighten me :D

Only looking at fitting a GT35R and by clearance I meant for everything.. including ratchet and spanner access :D

The majority of the manifolds I have found when looking about have the turbo sitting a good couple of inches above the cam cover. If anyone knows of any specific high mount manifolds that aren't too high.. please, enlighten me ;)

I am using a custom low mount manifold with a garret 35/40 and 48mm external wastegate, it has clearance everywhere, but it is a bit of a tight squeeze.

I preffer the low mount for lower engine bay heat temps as the hot air can escape out the bottom of the car. All factory turbo setups are low mount, there is a good reason for this.....

Im making my own low mount, GT35R, Got my flanges all drawn in cad (as close to match ported as possible-RB26), & laser cut using 12mm plate for all 3 flanges & steam pipe bends. Will take some pics when I start it. Do have a spare set of flanges to if anyone is interested, also have the cad drawing to get more cut if needed.

bearclaw? is that the model one up from the cameltoe and two up from the mooseknuckle? (you know..."mooseknuckle, because cameltoe has an ugly sister") (sorry)

just ordered the ATI damper i've been umming and aahing about, $500 landed on special from Summit Racing in the US. best i could find was about $745 here, if anyone's interested get in while the dollar is flying high.

cheers

Edited by Scooby

hey wat throttle body do u run with the greddy style plenium ?

80 or 90mm ?

also for those with aftermarket comps do u use the MAF sensor ? or do i need a Q45AFM or a Z32 afm ?

also

i need to know what turbo + manifold i should get ? - high mount or lowmount in a R31 skyline.

internal or external waste gate?

i was considering this.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...A:IT&ih=014

but i was told to stay away from it ?

also going to be runnin tomei poncams.

hey wat throttle body do u run with the greddy style plenium ?

80 or 90mm ?

also for those with aftermarket comps do u use the MAF sensor ? or do i need a Q45AFM or a Z32 afm ?

also

i need to know what turbo + manifold i should get ? - high mount or lowmount in a R31 skyline.

internal or external waste gate?

i was considering this.

http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi...A:IT&ih=014

but i was told to stay away from it ?

also going to be runnin tomei poncams.

i think the greddy style ones are for q45 TB's but you can get an adapter for a stock TB

and i would definately stay away from that turbo

Also for aftermarket TB's and fuel rails you can try Buzz Engines in Brisbane. They have done some nice work. http://www.buzzengines.com/

I need to get a decent fuel rail for the 26/30 as I'm running Delphi 680cc injectors and the O ring setup is not optimal with the GTR rail.

thats also something id like to make on our cnc's when they are up and running properly some billet fuel rails....im in love with these machines and they arent even setup fully and running...however next week they tell me!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...