Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

NGK BCP6ES-11 or something like that (could be BCP6CES..) then gap back down to 0.8

Why do you gap down to 0.8mm? What sort of boost are you running?

When I was smashing out to 19PSi, and hitting 11:1 AFR, gapped at 1.1mm, I didn't have a single issue of mis fire. If you have decent coil packs, keep the gap out large at 1.1mm to get a better flame front. Will give you a better burn.

Obviously if you're running huge boost (2 Bar Superstar) you may need to gap down, but from what I've seen, even 1.1mm with 25PSi and splitfires = perfectly fine...

Just wondering if you're gapping down to 0.8 from force of habit from doing it with shit coil packs on the RB25?

definately appears that the r31 bracket is identical to the modified r32+ ones

Hmm, odd. I would have thought there'd be more difference in the SOHC to DOHC but it must start spreading higher than where the bracket bolts.

I have always gapped at 0.8 and my mechanic always tells me to gap at 0.8, so I do and will continue to do so until he tells me otherwise :laugh:

P.S. I never had a 25.. I have OEM RB20 coils and a brand new coil harness.

Edited by bubba

Hi all,

Part way through the conversion and just had a couple of questions. .

1. Ive taken the balancer off the RB30 block but how the hell do i get the gear (behind the balancer) off??

2. Im trying to track down a RB25 balancer and RB25DET oil pump, what are some decent Jap wreckers to give a call??

3. In the guide it says to block the rear oil supply to the head and to fit 1.5mm restrictors at the front. On a photo of the head could somebody explain which ones to block and which ones to fit the restrictors too.

4. My motor will be non turbo for the next 6 months or so, looking to set the limiter to around the 7500 mark. Is it necessary to fit a full length oil pump drive collar to prevent oil pump failure?

That is all,

Thanks in advance.

Josh

or get -8 and they come at gapped at .8

:D

Can you actually get -8's?

Regardless, you should still check the gap.

If I wanted to run them at 1.1mm gap I wouldn't just throw the -11's straight in without regapping..

Hi all,

Another query. . Where the new spot for the tensioner/idler is, the threaded hole on my block does not have a flat surface surrounding it, and I imagine it needs to to seat the tensioner/idler properly??? :(

P100109_1639.jpg

P100109_163901.jpg

I had the same issue with my block, I didnt even realise until I had it bored etc.... Was an easy fix with a bit of steel & some work with the grinder. because the thread is still already tapped, all you need is a piece of steel to make a washer/backing plate.

measure how thick from the base of the stud to the height of the machined part of the block where the original tensioner sits (6mm rings a bell), drill a hole in the bit of steel, then shape the steel to fit flat & flush (bit of scalloping required to go over the oil gallery) Make sure you use a bit big enough to fit the flat of the tensioner onto, from memory Imy piece filled the whole area from the flat machined part right accross to where the cover sits.

grind it into shape until it sits spot on with the tensioner holding it in place, when thats all good I used liquid metal behind the new bit of plate & did up the tensioner to hold in place until cured. worked a treat for me, just a bit of messing around.

Hope this helps, havnt got any pics sorry.

  • 2 weeks later...

hey guys,

just a quick update. Made a great start to the year with my rb30 build. Managed to get a couple of mates giving me a hand and had the motor fully built and in the car running although it wasnt all smooth sailing. Had huge issues with the cambelt even with relocating the tensioners i am now using a mitsubishi belt.

Just a few questions still remaining which i hope you guys will help me out on...

1. I am using the rb25det big box in my r31 and have issues with my cross member, the r33 crossmember is too small and the r32 crossmember fits bit isnt tall enough for the box to rest on...(if that makes any sense)

2. When i started the car up for the first time excessive noise was coming from the head, im guessing its the lifters well at least hoping anyway as it was making a slight grinding noise, is this normal?

3. Power steering bracket, which is the suitable bracket to use is there one that bolts straight on or do you have to customise it to fit?

cheers for the help

Edited by Redliner007

1. sorry can't help there.

2. All grinding noises are not at all usual and should be looked at as a priority. Should start and run like a normal rb25 or rb30. Determine exactly where the noise is coming from and determine what is causing it.

3. I just used all my rb25 brackets to fit the p/s, a/c and alt.

1. Same as Al

2. Same as Al. Also drop the oil into a clean container and sift it for bits of metal. If theres metal in the oil, expect it to spin a bearing very soon.

3. Just cut off the top lug on the alternator bracket u have and use it

1. sorry can't help there.

2. All grinding noises are not at all usual and should be looked at as a priority. Should start and run like a normal rb25 or rb30. Determine exactly where the noise is coming from and determine what is causing it.

3. I just used all my rb25 brackets to fit the p/s, a/c and alt.

Are you serious you didn't modify the power steering bracket at all?

1. Same as Al

2. Same as Al. Also drop the oil into a clean container and sift it for bits of metal. If theres metal in the oil, expect it to spin a bearing very soon.

3. Just cut off the top lug on the alternator bracket u have and use it

I assume you mean power steering bracket..

Like shanef said, just cut the top lug/boss back flush with the rest and bob's your uncle/aunty.

thanks guys will get onto it tomorrow.

also another quick question which i just remembered... any/all of you that are using the n1 oil pump what is generally your oil pressure readings?

When i first started up the motor it was maxed out at 8 and came down to about 6-7 (3/4) up. I'm not using a crank collar as suggested due to time and difficulty during assembly.

Are you serious you didn't modify the power steering bracket at all?
I didn't build the engine, but i do not recall my mechanic whining about modifying the p/s bracket, he let me know of everything else :)

Below are a few "progress pics" from the build, let me know if any mods have been done to the bracket:

post-1811-1233054856_thumb.jpg

post-1811-1233054946_thumb.jpg

post-1811-1233055067_thumb.jpg

Has to have been modified, you see the top bolt of the bracket (right near the head), on RB20/25/26 the top bolt bolts to the head (hence the deeper boss). With the 30 all 3 bolts bolt to the block.

I could maybe see how an RB30E bracket would fit (obviously), but how it positions the pump compared to the twincam engines, I don't know. Never thought to try an RB30E power steering bracket.. I just hacked into mine with the wizzah disk :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...