Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

If everything runs to plan my RB25/30 will be complete this weekend. Last night bolted to top part of the RB20DET plenum onto the bottom part of the RB25DE plenum. Had i got look at it and noticed that on the runners of the RB25DE, the water jacket that runs alongs the plenum has a bung in the end of it, whereas the RB20DET has a nipple. Do i have to drill and tap this and pit a nipple in it, or can the hose be ran as where?

Sorry to ask the same question again...kinda hoping that someone may have since stumbled accross the info im after :confused:

What is the weight of the std RB30 rod, also the piston weight (separate weights pls)

Is there any difference between the R31, VL series I & II rods, and other than Argo and Carrillo are there any other manufacturers of RB30 rods.

Reading the early pages of the thread it seems that eveyone is running prep'd std rods, assuming 7,500rpm what is the SAFE limit of these puppies, figures of 350rwkws seem to be thrown around provided tune is close to the mark. Whatever the rule of thumb figure is i imagine that takes into account the lighter forged pistons ppl are running:confused:

Sorry about all the questions. :Oops: and yes i read the forst 35 pages of this thread last night :(

got my eagle 4340 chromoly forged h-beam rods today, they are a work of art!!! THere are a few mods that need to be done to accomodate them but they are nice and they are a better price than argo or carillos....i'll post a pic!!!!

stock rod= from memory its been a while since i weighed them but i think they were 525 grams.

the eagles are 590 grams or something and are rated at 130hp per rod!!!

got my eagle 4340 chromoly forged h-beam rods today, they are a work of art!!! THere are a few mods that need to be done to accomodate them but they are nice and they are a better price than argo or carillos....i'll post a pic!!!!

stock rod= from memory its been a while since i weighed them but i think they were 525 grams.

the eagles are 590 grams or something and are rated at 130hp per rod!!!

Have you checked the thickness of the big end on the rod to make sure it fits the width of the big end journal on the crank? You should also test an RB big end bearing in the rod for entrapment. :)

Hi S13drifter...

thanks for confirming that the eagle rods are heavier than stock. I was told this a while ago and asked the question but no one knew for certain.

i just hope that they will be bloody worth it in the long run!

and i hope the extra weight doesnt affect things too much in terms of making power :Oops:

SK i think thats where these rods are modified... The RB30 rods are actually Chev 6" small block rods ??

YEah they are the right width as they have been machined to take nissan gudgeons at the little end, so the little end bush is now 21mm instead of 22.78 that a chev is... and the big end requires the crank to be ground around 35 thou i think.... i haven't measured it all yet cause i only got them today, but due to the grinding i dont think they will take the nissan bearings rather the chev ones im unsure untill i look at it all or maybe even another bearing like a speciallised type from clevite 77 ect... and yes i have no doubt they are chev 6 inch small journal rods but if the shoe fits!!!

I have seen these used in another build ie. another rb30 but not twin cam head... they are slightly longer than stock and require the use of a metal head gasket ( not my best friend but will still work) of about 40 thou or 1mm to obtain an optimal quench of around .45thou!..

Cheers, Daniel

I think you will find that they are basically 6.017" VG30 rods (RB30 is 6") with the wider big end and bushed for 21 mm gudgeons (VG30 has the bigger 22 mm gudgeon). The Chevy rod (being for a V8) is offset to allow for the shared big end journals. It is possible that Eagle are machining a Chevy rod, but I reckon the VG30 is a better starting point.

Good to see Eagle make a "small step for them" and a "large step for us". They are a good rod maker, you should be happy with the results.

As for weights, weigh the pistons and rod together and compare that with the standard piston and rod. I think you will find an advantage there. :)

As for weights, weigh the pistons and rod together and compare that with the standard piston and rod.  I think you will find an advantage there. :)

Yeh was thinking that but if i dont need the rods for the added strength they offer, i want everything as light as possible...no point having rods capable of 450rwkw if im only making 350rwkws, especially if it means paying more and having extra weight....is there a gaping hole in my logic?

I dunno if it's a gaping hole, but personally I'd prefer to have that extra tolerance headroom on the rods, rather than getting to 340rwkw and wondering when something may or may not let go. :rofl:

Ability to rev slightly harder/faster Vs Peace of mind. :)

I also have a question about aftermarket rods.

Has anyone tried or heard feedback on Crower rods.

They make them for the rb30 http://www.modyourcar.com.au/product_info....roducts_id=3007

Also been considering Arias forged pistons. http://www.modyourcar.com.au/product_info....products_id=528

Are there any other things I should be asking in regards to the above parts?

SK- My own RB31DET has 268 inlet and 272 exhaust both with 10.5mm lift.

What kind of power do these cams make?, is it ok for a daily driver?

You are no doubt aware that RB25's have hydraulic followers and that you would be limited to ~256 degree cams with ~9.2 mm lift to retain the VVT. This means no change in valve springs is neccessary.

What power is possible with the above cams mentioned?.

PS: I have all the support systems etc..

when you guys are making the RB30DET's from the RB25DET's are you adapting the RB25 side mount oil cooler ?

Apparently the rb30 has a one way valve in the way instead of a proper bush that the rb25 uses to pass the oil to the oil cooler which is cooled by the cooling system??

My RB30DET is going to be modded to accept the oil cooler as oil temps in RB30DET's is definatly something that needs to be watched.

Anyone else done this or know anyone to do it with their RB30DET Hybrids ?

Im just gunna fit the grex kit ive got to cover the oil issue (only really need it if you wanna do some track work)

As for rods...well ive asked this question before....decide what you want the car for. I set my limit at 350rwkw. Std rods, ive been told, will hold. I couldnt justify spending another $1800 - $2000 on top of the $5500 ive already spent on the rest of the motor, just to push it past the 350 limit.

It is a RWD car, and i can already see huge traction problems...Id rather spend the extra dosh on tyres and suspension mods to get the 350rwkw to the ground first :)

when you guys are making the RB30DET's from the RB25DET's are you adapting the RB25 side mount oil cooler ?

Apparently the rb30 has a one way valve in the way instead of a proper bush that the rb25 uses to pass the oil to the oil cooler which is cooled by the cooling system??

My RB30DET is going to be modded to accept the oil cooler as oil temps in RB30DET's is definatly something that needs to be watched.

Anyone else done this or know anyone to do it with their RB30DET Hybrids ?

Just need to fit the Skyline part from another RB block so that the adaptor seals.

I have done this. I have a HKS oil cooler with remote filter mount etc.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...