Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

STD RB26

EMANAGE ULTIMATE PLUG AND PLAY WITH OPTIONAL PRESSURE SENSOR

700CC BLITZ INJECTORS

TRUST T517Z'S TURBO'S WITH 8CM HOUSINGS (BABY'S)

TRUST INTAKE AND COOLER PIPING KIT

TRUST COOLER

JJR ALLOY PIPE KIT

STD DUMPS

TRUST MILD STEEL FRONT PIPES

TRUST 80MM TITANIUM CAT-OUT EXHAUST

290.8RWKW @ 14.8PSI

328RWKW @ 18PSI

yeah they didnt arrive in time, i only like the to use these as they offer the best results with the combo.

we also stopped at 18psi as the car will only run 15psi during comp use.

Even so doing the runs @18psi with 3 people in the boot and a few differrent attempts to stop wheel spin we could not get a wheelspin free run..... damn those drifted on square tyres realistically i would expect a bit more say 15rwkw at 18psi and 10rwkw @ 15psi but it will have to wait. I really wanted to tune up to 22psi as these things really come on song up there but having a flashy dyno sheet was not worth the effort of changing tyres.... call me lazy.

PICS SOON

post-34927-1175049749.jpg

Edited by URAS
  • 2 weeks later...

yeah what a dissapointing weekend at round two of DA for DCR, we had issues with the car all weekend.... somewhere in the 10yo factory GTR loom is an evil power robbing wiring gremlin.... car would not rev over 5000rpm consistantly.... bring on the next round.

i was suprised she qualified mid field with such a misbehaving car .....

What exhaust components did you customise (if any)?

I'd assume you would leave the front pipe sitting in such a way that any off-the-shelf S13 catback would fit.

None GTR front pipes and s13 cat back line up perfectly

  • 2 weeks later...

trent hows the car going mate? was spuen the tailshaft let go on the dyno, cant believe the damage and it was so close to you aswell.. The dyno is fixed :blink: all is a.o.k down there, next time your on dyno i must see!!!

You guys heading down to winton tomorow with it?

  • 4 weeks later...

UPDATE:

Had the car a Calder for its first real shakedown and after lots of suspension fettling the car seems to be quite a weapon. looking forward to having some fun at wakefield on the weekend.

post-34927-1180587924_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS

BTW nice looking car looks mint on the track.

I notice the power figures you quote are quite nice but @ calder it seemed to bog down a lot, fuel up and struggle to go anywhere. I know a lot of GT-R guys ditched the trust turbo's due to lag are you guys have some issues or just not finished tuning?

BTW nice looking car looks mint on the track.

I notice the power figures you quote are quite nice but @ calder it seemed to bog down a lot, fuel up and struggle to go anywhere. I know a lot of GT-R guys ditched the trust turbo's due to lag are you guys have some issues or just not finished tuning?

not sure what you mean? she could not find enough grip she was harldy ever giving it much stick ie hardly reved it over 6000 as it spun str8 to redline.... it is actually too responsive (better than the garret 2860-5's used on previous cars). and could not get traction..... maybe it looked that way as we were not drifting the last corner properly as the car holds too much speed to pull up in time for the barriers, the final corner is a no brainer and wastes tyres for no reason......

we also dont go to these practice nights at calder to go flat out comp style, we go there just to set up the car a lot of people mistake testing different aspects of the car to us actaully having problems, we had only a few handling issues (lack of traction) which is now sorted.

The car is going to NSW for a comp this weekend and we could not afford to damage so we only did what we needed not what people probaly wanted to see..... which opens a whole other issue, i dont think people should have to pay to watch a practice session because many expect to go and see drifting only. Often we will only do one section at a time make a few changes and try another section purely to save the car and tyres..... and the crowd doesnt understand this (obvious from your statement) other drivers even put in complaints that we were doing fishies on the str8 and when they themselves did it they got kicked off...... we were warming tyres....big differrence.

post-34927-1181026376_thumb.jpg

Edited by URAS
  • 3 weeks later...

hey trent will you and cat be at winton on the 23rd? if so, hope to see you guys there :D

The r33 is finished and is at creatd to get tuned, hopefully it goes well also being my first time on track ;)

cheers. Phill

  • 4 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...