Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Don't get me wrong, I LOVE THE VEYRON!!! every statistic about it is mind blowing it is insane in every way and it sounds VERY tough but i really think its sound is not that unique, its a lot like a deep rumble of a V8 except deeper and more like an earthquake. The Carrera GT on the other hand has such an awesome howl I think i would need tissues if i ever heard one drive by! I cant think of another road car that sounds anything like it, the next closest thing is an F1 car....

Edited by r32line
  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

i've seen and heard a few GTs now in real life and yes they are nuts. seen 3 or 4 now in tokyo alone!

got a little vid of one coming out of a hall, and into the traffic. even just the driver blipping the throttle as he was edging out sounds mad. then I saw one on gaienhigashi-dori in azabu with the throttle nailed and I nearly wet myself. then as I was going down to the carpark in my friends appartment to borrow my friends car I saw one in the carpark!!! nice place to live. lol

I have to tell you the sound of the Ferrari F430 V8 from the drivers seat of a spider version with the roof down is the most porn sound I've heard. It sounds totally different from inside the car to what they sound when they drive past.

It's the complete opposite of something like the Aston Martin V8 Vantage which sounds the best when it drives past you but is actually quite muted from inside the car.

So having said all this I don't think anyone can say car X sounds the best if all they have done in seen one on TV.

couple vids where you get to hear some sweet noises...

Ferrari drag race 360 vs CS - http://aussieexotics.com/videos/ferrari-dr...-stradale-4025/

bunch of exotics going by at 250-280kph - http://aussieexotics.com/videos/high-speed-drive-bys-3971/

Lamborghini Gallardo SE - http://aussieexotics.com/videos/lamborghin...d-drive-by-4835

we're in a 360 Spider and being overtaken by a Challenge Stradale at about 220kph on full noise - http://aussieexotics.com/videos/lamborghin...e-exhaust-4027/

couple Lambos and Honda NSX - http://aussieexotics.com/videos/lamborghini-old-vs-new-5657/

all have stock exhaust except the NSX with a crazy F1 race thingy. :D

man i have so many vids, just not enough time to edit and upload them all. ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...