Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey guys, i searched but i didnt really find much. i was wondering if anyone knew what speakers the r33 came with from the factory for the front 2 door speakers. the guy who owned my car before me had a system in it and took out the backspeakers+sub&amp but i opened the door trim up and it has clarion speakers (had something about custom? written on them?). just wanted to see if they were the stock speakers or not

cheers

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/159612-r33-stock-speakers/
Share on other sites

There were several speakers offered as factory fitment options, and I'm pretty sure there was a Clarion (Addzest) one offered. All of them are nothing special. Post a photo if you really want to be sure.

There were several speakers offered as factory fitment options, and I'm pretty sure there was a Clarion (Addzest) one offered. All of them are nothing special. Post a photo if you really want to be sure.

if they skinny and old then they stock :) (i think lol)

hey guys, i searched but i didnt really find much. i was wondering if anyone knew what speakers the r33 came with from the factory for the front 2 door speakers. the guy who owned my car before me had a system in it and took out the backspeakers+sub&amp but i opened the door trim up and it has clarion speakers (had something about custom? written on them?). just wanted to see if they were the stock speakers or not

cheers

stockies are paper and shit... they look like your average old paper speaker, with clarion litteraly stamped on the magnet... you wouldnt buy them at a store, and they wouldnt be sold at a store...

if they are of any quality at all, they would be aftermarket ones... dunno how good, but not stock...

yer, as Chris mentions, I think the stockers were 6.75" x 6" or something crazy like that.

6.5" only just fit, depending on the mounting holes on the new spearkers. I'd guess that Pioneer or Kenwood 6.75" speakers would fit better.

yer, as Chris mentions, I think the stockers were 6.75" x 6" or something crazy like that.

6.5" only just fit, depending on the mounting holes on the new spearkers. I'd guess that Pioneer or Kenwood 6.75" speakers would fit better.

6.5" round will fit 6.75 round WILL NOT without a new panel. done 3 this week and they were all too big.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...