Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i also think there are two issues here (well maybe)

compressor surge of "fluttering" occurs when pressure past the compressor is beyond what the compessor can supply

ie:

workshop A hiflow and do whatever and you go and run the turbo

you dial in 15psi but forwhatever reason (mismatched combo, bad wheel, etc) then manifold pressure ramps to 22psi

the compressor wheel surge's as the pressure past the outlet is greater than what it can supply so it flutters/surge's

i would expect this problem to only occur at full throttle, wide open throttle and aggressive boost building / full load

the other scenario is the common after market twin turbo flutter / chuffing

which i think is a combo of the bov's half opening and venting back and then actuators opening/closing

in a harsh and on/off type fashion instead of soft and progressive.

this only occurs during light / medium load and usually up a hill is a good example of when it occurs

Yes, it's just as you described in your second scenario. But again how are the BOV's opening when I've blocked the vacuum supply line off to them?

  • Replies 54
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The wastegate is located on the Turbine/Rear of the turbo

The surging is from the comressor wheel, which is on the Intake/front side of the turbo

Comp surge (the type we are talking about here) occurs when the turbos are flowing more air than then motor can handle

The air is coming from the compressor side, and has nothing to do with wastegate operation on the rear end of the turbo.

How it is tuned out, i am not sure. I'm yet to go across that in my travels

Yer, I understand the basics of the turbo charger... but is compressor surge something that normaly occurs under full throttle/load conditions? Because this occurs just cruising along a flat section of road in a 60 zone?? But when I load up the engine (3/4 throttle say) it comes out of it??

Yes, it's just as you described in your second scenario. But again how are the BOV's opening when I've blocked the vacuum supply line off to them?

the BOV's actually float on their seats more with the vacuum (and pressure to seat remmeber) line dissconected. I predominantly build car for drift and the rapid on/off throttle conditions often leave a bov lagging somewhat behind (poor response and fuel mixture control if vented) and it is common to get this surging effect (different cause but safe effect), it is one of the reasons myself and many others do not run BOV's on our engines. Originally the mechanics from signal auto enlightened me to the problem as i had a similar problem with my 180 and BAI their driver at the time lokked over with their mech and picked it up within a couple of minutes.

i think the key would be for you guys to log (not possible with std ecu, unless you have consult type logger) the AFM voltages as the "surging" 'chuffing' occurs im sure you will find it bouncing all over the joint (this will actually tell you what the airflow is doing inside the compressors and inlet tract).

it would also be interesting to log the outlet pressures of each turbo at the same time and compare them to each other and plenum pressures.

Edited by URAS
but is compressor surge something that normaly occurs under full throttle/load conditions?

Nope.

Because this occurs just cruising along a flat section of road in a 60 zone?? But when I load up the engine (3/4 throttle say) it comes out of it??

As i expect it would. The BOV's leak, thats what they are meant to do.

This avoids this problem... what your expiriencing i've heard of a lot, only when running A/M BOV's because they are locked tight and bring this issue up.

So its odd you get it using the stockers.

As dirtgarage said, he expirienced it. ask him more mayb

Ive seen vlt's surge their heads off due to incorect timing. Also bad or mismatched highflows cause surge.

You will never get rid %100 of flutter on light loads even with a bov. Thats an issue you will have to live with, or OEM it and put an airbox on or a really weak factory recirc bov.

I believe the intake wheel of the Turbo slows down when you back your pedal off or change gears.

The excess amount of air is pushed back onto the incoming air it has tried to create.

Thus causing fluttering, the longer you drive around the softer this sound becomes.

the harder you push the car...the better the sound becomes

I know what fluttering is and how it comes about but i'm more interested it this 'surging' that can apparently be tuned out.

Ok so what do you call it when the wastegates go chu,chu,chu,chu and the car surges and carries on? please elighten me. I've already ruled out the BOV's as I said earlier.... I'm confused

That's when air is going backwards through the afm and the ece registers it as air going in. Still waiting to hear how this can be tuned out.

Nah, no boost controler. Do you think it would help?

How do you moniter boost then?

What boost are you running?

More than likely...I bet the boost of the one turbo is not matched with the other then.

Do you know if the actuators are set at the same boost?

Get a boost controller.AVCR....is the best

This has a self learn program which alters the turbo's boost according to how you drive.

I blocked the bleed side of the boost solenoid off today and by doing so dropped the boost down a fair bit, it didn't stop the flutter but it certainly softened the effects. After work I put the boost back to 1 bar to drive home and for some strange reason it hardly played up at all?? The flutter was practically gone! I also noticed the idle was a tad lower than usual for some reason, it usually sits at around 1200rpm and today it was around a 1000, then I had I thought.... could it have something to do with the idle circuit? Obviously my idle control valve is open a fair way for it to be idling at 1200rpm on any normal day, so could this being open so far be causing havoc and confusion with the presure differences either side of the throttle butterflies? Just a thought? Maybe just clutching at straws now!

That's when air is going backwards through the afm and the ece registers it as air going in.

Exactly

As i said before...our car was almost UNDRIVEABLE...with only 2530's...chuffing its guts out at light throttle especially up hills.

Tuned by Jim Souvas at Croydons...fixed...

NOTHING ELSE on the car was touched...NOT the blow off valves...NOT the wastegates...NOT the airflow meters.

JUST THE BLOODY ECU.

get it tuned. (if you need a near new power fc and hand controller i have one for sale..PM me)

p.s. with larger low mounts i.e. HKS GT-RS turbo's on a 2.6ltr its more difficult to completely tune it out. Yes even Jim had trouble tuning it out of our car. With the increased capacity of a larger bore and stroke this problem can be overcome.

How do you moniter boost then?

What boost are you running?

More than likely...I bet the boost of the one turbo is not matched with the other then.

Do you know if the actuators are set at the same boost?

Get a boost controller.AVCR....is the best

This has a self learn program which alters the turbo's boost according to how you drive.

you know that a bleed valve can be used or the factory solenoid.

remember that turbos do not create "boost"; they just push air. It is the restriction through the pipes and head that is "boost"; "boost" is merely a measure of resistance.

the turbos themselves do not see "mismatched boost" they spin happily away and jointly create the airflow that the cylinders see.

if one wastegate opens slightly earlier than the other, it should not create a pulse, as it just means the volume of air provided by one turbo is now limited; consider that a motor with one blown ceramic wheel still makes "boost" as there is still one turbo pressurising the air.

This sounds like turbo 'shuffle' to me. Its quite common on poorly setup GTR's and its nothing to do with blow off valves. Its a problem you can experience with twin parallel turbo arrangements.

You should be able to cure it completely on the 2860-5's/2530 sizes turbos as previously mentioned but the problem becomes more pronounced and more difficult to eradicate on larger twins like the GT-RS/2860-10.

The problem can be caused by exhaust gas flow differences between the turbos causing the turbos to spool at different rates. This can be corrected by tuning to some degree and also a move to a pair of exhaust manifolds with a 'bridge' pipe like the ones HKS do.

Apparently ditching the standard 'Twin Turbo' common top pipe for a hard pipe kit which has longer seperated pipes for each compressor outlet can also help reduce the the problem.

I experienced this on my RB25DETT when I first converted it to twin turbos. I had the luxury of three boost gauges on the car, one on the outlet of each of the turbos and one at the plenum. From the gauges you could see that one of the turbos was boosting slightly faster than the other one. When the 'chuffing' occurred you could see the turbo outlet gauges flicking in time with the 'chuff'.

Adjusted the actuator slightly on the 'lazy' turbo which instantly improved matters and then spent further time mapping the car which eradicated the problem entirely.

There are a few threads about this problem on GTROC.

Edited by mambastu

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...