Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just after an opinion.

I am thinking of making some gauges up using a microcontroller I have. I can do it 2 ways. The 1st is to use a small motor or servo, and put a needle and scale on a circumference like a regular gauge. The 2nd option is to use a couple "seven segment displays" (fully lit up they show an eight) to show what the reading is.

What do you reackon is easier to read? and which one looks nicer?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162523-what-gauges-do-you-like-better/
Share on other sites

An analogue-face gauge is easier to read at a glance. Visually, the angle of a needle registers a lot faster than an actual number. You glance at a needle and know its in the "safe" zone as a learned reaction. You can't glance at a string of digits - you need to actually "read" that number (which takes longer and requires your eyes to focus.) Your brain then needs to compare the viewed number with what it knows to be a safe value, which also requires more brain power.

58 and 68 look a lot different on an analogue face - if you're glancing at those numbers on a digital display they look almost the same. You need to "think" more about it.

This is especially the case on a speedo, or any other meter that has constantly fluctuating numbers. The biggest problem digital speedos had back in the day is that they refreshed quickly, and people had to sit and stare at the speedo to "register" how fast they're going.

For data that's not as likely to change as quickly (water and oil temps, battery voltage, etc) a digital display would be good. That way the user can register an exact number, for more accurate logging, to make better comparisons.

EDIT: Wait, when you say numbers do you mean actual numbers (0-9), or a row of bars that sequentially light up like an S2000 tacho?

My thoughts exactly on the numbers vs dials. Will stick with the dials then.

I meant Actual numbers 0-9. I was thinking of doing bar thing like S2000 dash or the data loggers. I was hoping to find a colour LCD screen that was fast enough, but I haven't tried that hard yet.

Should have conducted a pole,,,,,

I miss the analogue watch in the car mounted like a show-piece.

The answer to you is....depends on what you are trying to read.

I.E.Love looking at the rev meter in my Nismo Cluster,but would also like a digital format below that will let me know when to change gear,or help me to change gears.ie drag racing

So it depends...function is better than looks.

With a simple micrcontroller you could make some funky gauges. Instead of having a needle that rotates to point to a reading, you could have LEDs on a circumference that light up as the temp/pressure etc goes up, then if it goes over a certain value the LEDs turn red. That would be even easier.

With a simple micrcontroller you could make some funky gauges. Instead of having a needle that rotates to point to a reading, you could have LEDs on a circumference that light up as the temp/pressure etc goes up, then if it goes over a certain value the LEDs turn red. That would be even easier.

Your looking for a Christmas tree?

I though you were more interested in the way they design them...........

It is so you are not distracted by them and cause an accident.....

A good design is a functional one.......without the light show..... :)

I was curious as to what designs people like as far as functionality goes or what they find easier to read. Pretty much what scathing said. SO I won't be going with a number style display as it could possibly distracting.

I will make some models up, then post them.

Edited by dontfeelcold

FOR RPM Nismo type gauges,,...with green to red light show below...running from left to right...that might look good.

This will indicate when to change gears.

Speedo kms...Nismo type sucks...

Large digital read out with car odometer underneath this....analogue.

Boost ,torque split and oil all to be like the nismo cluster"centre"...except for boost level.....Digital in centre.

And digital clock ...like a gentlemens time piece...analogue with clear numbers around it.

I will start with a oil pressure gauge, I don't have one on my R31.

I will have a play with needle style one first (the PICAXE microcontroller I have will do this easily) as the LED and Digital character types are easier to program for, but I will need a microcontroller with a lot more outputs unless I can think of a way to program it with only a few outputs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
    • That's my life. Past-Duncan has a lot to answer for
×
×
  • Create New...