Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just after an opinion.

I am thinking of making some gauges up using a microcontroller I have. I can do it 2 ways. The 1st is to use a small motor or servo, and put a needle and scale on a circumference like a regular gauge. The 2nd option is to use a couple "seven segment displays" (fully lit up they show an eight) to show what the reading is.

What do you reackon is easier to read? and which one looks nicer?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/162523-what-gauges-do-you-like-better/
Share on other sites

An analogue-face gauge is easier to read at a glance. Visually, the angle of a needle registers a lot faster than an actual number. You glance at a needle and know its in the "safe" zone as a learned reaction. You can't glance at a string of digits - you need to actually "read" that number (which takes longer and requires your eyes to focus.) Your brain then needs to compare the viewed number with what it knows to be a safe value, which also requires more brain power.

58 and 68 look a lot different on an analogue face - if you're glancing at those numbers on a digital display they look almost the same. You need to "think" more about it.

This is especially the case on a speedo, or any other meter that has constantly fluctuating numbers. The biggest problem digital speedos had back in the day is that they refreshed quickly, and people had to sit and stare at the speedo to "register" how fast they're going.

For data that's not as likely to change as quickly (water and oil temps, battery voltage, etc) a digital display would be good. That way the user can register an exact number, for more accurate logging, to make better comparisons.

EDIT: Wait, when you say numbers do you mean actual numbers (0-9), or a row of bars that sequentially light up like an S2000 tacho?

My thoughts exactly on the numbers vs dials. Will stick with the dials then.

I meant Actual numbers 0-9. I was thinking of doing bar thing like S2000 dash or the data loggers. I was hoping to find a colour LCD screen that was fast enough, but I haven't tried that hard yet.

Should have conducted a pole,,,,,

I miss the analogue watch in the car mounted like a show-piece.

The answer to you is....depends on what you are trying to read.

I.E.Love looking at the rev meter in my Nismo Cluster,but would also like a digital format below that will let me know when to change gear,or help me to change gears.ie drag racing

So it depends...function is better than looks.

With a simple micrcontroller you could make some funky gauges. Instead of having a needle that rotates to point to a reading, you could have LEDs on a circumference that light up as the temp/pressure etc goes up, then if it goes over a certain value the LEDs turn red. That would be even easier.

With a simple micrcontroller you could make some funky gauges. Instead of having a needle that rotates to point to a reading, you could have LEDs on a circumference that light up as the temp/pressure etc goes up, then if it goes over a certain value the LEDs turn red. That would be even easier.

Your looking for a Christmas tree?

I though you were more interested in the way they design them...........

It is so you are not distracted by them and cause an accident.....

A good design is a functional one.......without the light show..... :)

I was curious as to what designs people like as far as functionality goes or what they find easier to read. Pretty much what scathing said. SO I won't be going with a number style display as it could possibly distracting.

I will make some models up, then post them.

Edited by dontfeelcold

FOR RPM Nismo type gauges,,...with green to red light show below...running from left to right...that might look good.

This will indicate when to change gears.

Speedo kms...Nismo type sucks...

Large digital read out with car odometer underneath this....analogue.

Boost ,torque split and oil all to be like the nismo cluster"centre"...except for boost level.....Digital in centre.

And digital clock ...like a gentlemens time piece...analogue with clear numbers around it.

I will start with a oil pressure gauge, I don't have one on my R31.

I will have a play with needle style one first (the PICAXE microcontroller I have will do this easily) as the LED and Digital character types are easier to program for, but I will need a microcontroller with a lot more outputs unless I can think of a way to program it with only a few outputs.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...