Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ok i recently blew my little rb20 in my r32 but now im working on a rebuild for it

my car produced 238.8 rwkw @ 19psi before i cracked a cylinder and blew a piston ring

the car already had low compression so i knew it was coming The internals are stock.

i decided to rebuild the 20 instead of dropping in an rb25 because there is too many legal issues

With changing it over..

MY MODS

GT30 turbo 450hp

High mount stainless manifold

660cc denso injectors

3inch exhaust turbo back to hi flow cat

hybrid Front mount intercooler

fuel pump

K+N filter

external waste gate to screamer pipe

greddy electoric boost controler

i am going to strengthen the internals just so i can reliably run 20 - 22 psi

Im not sure what internals i should change and what to use i dont wanna spend over $6000

on the rebuild unless i have to

im getting forged pistons what else do i need?

also wanna try and get a little more down low torque as everybody knows how laggy my setup

is with the rb20 is there any other mods i can do to the engine while its all opened up?

someone said flowing heads? or plenum? i dont even know what these are?

what do you guys recon id like to do mods that you cant see just to be safe from cops

even now its already obvious but easy to change back to stock

Sorry for the long thread but id like help before i go see my mechanic and he tells me that ive gotta spend $10,000 to get what i want if you know what i mean...

Cheers Antz...

Why not get an RB25 or RB26 crank/rods and stroke it baby, more torque and the cops won"t pick it. You also have a full reco engine, not a second hand 100,000 km RB26 time bomb!

Just my 2c worth

There is still hope regarding that bottom end. Still chasing to see if its in the back of the workshop. But realistically...its too much money to build your RB20. For $600 you can get a wrecker RB20 with warranty. I have used a wrecker SR20 (was a great engine) and my current wrecker RB20 that is makign more power then yours and i dare say i drive mine harder then most owners...and mine is in perfect health.

The trick is to get the thing tuned by a person that knows what they are doing. (Thats not to say your tuner doesnt)

thats all good but if i drop in any other engine other than the rb20 and i get epa'ed im screwed

Aren't i ????

how far do they look into it if i do get epa'ed?

you cant just put anything in it and hope that you dont get done for it.

my head is done in............................. i just wanna drive my skyline again

thats all good but if i drop in any other engine other than the rb20 and i get epa'ed im screwed

Aren't i ????

how far do they look into it if i do get epa'ed?

Basically... if they catch you... your f**ked to put it bluntly :)

There is no way around it if you wanna be "legal-ish"

If you want power upto 260rwkw, its RB25.

If you want more than that, its RB26 if you ask me.

RB25 limit is 260rwkw because after that, your outta options using the stock size turbo, and i was pinned for a GT30 on RB25 :thumbsup:

RB26 is the the only way if you want to avoid hassles/fines etc over 260rwkw. I've been there, hence i just went RB26.

When you do the costings up of a potential EPA, and what its costs to go back to stock... its simply not worth it and its MORE than the cost of an RB26 conversion

ok thats what i wanna know. i will port the head then and put cams in.

Maybe NOS next time i blow it up what you recon?

anyway boys thanks for the help ive decided what im doing i will let you's all know when its done.

hopefully have a reliable 250rwkw with not too much hassle from cops

cheers

nos is probably the eaiest way to get more power and response

legality issues of it? yeah cos exteranl gate, screamer, aftermarket ecu, bigger turbo etc are all legal modifications

nos is probably the eaiest way to get more power and response

legality issues of it? yeah cos exteranl gate, screamer, aftermarket ecu, bigger turbo etc are all legal modifications

Im not suggesting that these other modifications are legal. But the risks involved with nitrous would far outway the risks involved with an aftermarket ECU.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
    • Not a problem at all Lithium, I appreciate your help regardless. I've pulled a small part of a log where the target pressure was 28psi and it spiked to 36.4psi. I've only just begun using Data Log Viewer so if I'm sending this in the wrong format let me know.
×
×
  • Create New...