Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey All.

I have done some basic suspension mods and have replaced the following.

Whiteline front and rear springs

Whiteline adjustable rear swaybar

Adjustable castor rods

The car understeered like a pig untill the rear swaybar went on and is now a lot better but still lacks turn in and mid conner grip. so I fitted the castor rods and am going to have an alignment done this week and would like advice on settings

I am looking at

Front Camber - 1.00 (do not have adjustment but should be close to this do not want excessive tyre wear)

Front Caster - 12.00 (is this to much? I want turn in to be razor sharp)

SAI - 9.00

Front Toe - 0.5mm Toe Out on each side ( want turn in sharp will it tramline with 0.5?)

Rear Camber - 0.5 ( is this enough?)

Rear Toe 2.0mm In on each side (Will this increse stability? is it ok to have toe out on front and toe in on rear?)

The car sees 80% road and 20% drift and skidpan gets driven fairly hard not babied.

please let me know what you think of these settings :thumbsup: Also the rear swaybar is on medium as the hard setting decreases traction.

particularly the castor.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/164639-fix-that-understeer/
Share on other sites

yeah go for as much castor as you can get with the rods. 12 degrees will be impressive if you can get that much. if you do a bit of drift etc I would be a bit less conservative with the toe. run a bit more front. maybe 1mm each side and a bit less rear toe in. maybe make that 1.5mm in each side. it will be more oversteery but for drift that shouldn't be a problem to control. the extra front toe out (think mine is 1.8mm each side atm on the GTR yes I know different car) will make it much more pointy, possibly a bit less stable at high speed but certainly not undrivable.

Mt car turns in like a champion. Have tge swaybars cranked on teh harest setting and have 3.5 deg neg camber on the front. I have pretty soft springs so need that sort of camber...though i only have 5.5 castor.

Even when i had -2.2 deg camber on the front my car turned in awesome. I think you simply dont have enough camber on the front

To give you an idea on what I've got is masive sway bars. I'm pretty sure its 1.5mm toe out either side on the front. 2.25 degree front camber there abouts anyway, and its about 8-9degree of castor. The rear has about 1.25 camber, and not sure how much toe in. And I gotta say its pretty much spot on. Front is 365mm from center of wheel to top of wheel arch rear is 355mm for the same.

I think there is a little improvement that could be made with just a wisker more camber and castor. But as atm its got as much as it can wound in to it, so its going to cost more money, so Im not going to bother.

If it's used for drift/skid pan, dont go overboard with castor. When you're counter steering, castor will add camber the wrong way so you will be decreasing contact patch and hence grip. 8-9deg is a bit more normal as previously mentioned.

I would run less toe in on the rear for better turn in and a bit more camber on the front.

What's your rear camber like?

Thanks all for the replies. I will adjust my settings given your advice and go for

Front Camber - 1.50

Front Caster - 12.00

SAI - 9.00

Front Toe - 1.0mm Toe Out on each side

Rear Camber - 1.0

Rear Toe 1.0mm In on each side

If I do get 12deg castor and find it is to much, will I be able to adjust it back to 9deg without affecting the rest of the geometry?

The only good place in Canberra is on the other side of the city and i can only get there once every 2nd week so i would like to get it right the first time.

Thanks!

Get your 12 degrees castor put in and do a lap around the carpark before leaving the alignment shop. It'll take it when the wheels are straight, but try and put some lock on with a bit of load and be ready to tear out inner guards and buckle the front panels.

adjusting the castor back will throw the toe settings out.

I doubt you will get 12deg with just adjustable castor rods anyway. You will need to play with the upper arm a lot to reach that much, or keep your front bar off so your wheels dont touch it ;)

With 1.5deg camber, you should max the castor out at around 8deg without scrubbing on things. That has been my experience with R32s anyway.

Cool thanks dudes.

The castor rods I have are rated to 12deg. and I have removed the inner guards and my front guards have been rolled so I will just ask for max castor. I will report back

Could you do me a small favour. Measure up the wheelbase of the car before & after you wind all that caster in. just curious to see how much it changes. Also curious to see how long the upper wishbone bushes last....

Hey All.

I have done some basic suspension mods and have replaced the following.

Whiteline front and rear springs

Whiteline adjustable rear swaybar

Adjustable castor rods

The car understeered like a pig untill the rear swaybar went on and is now a lot better but still lacks turn in and mid conner grip. so I fitted the castor rods and am going to have an alignment done this week and would like advice on settings

I am looking at

Front Camber - 1.00 (do not have adjustment but should be close to this do not want excessive tyre wear)

Front Caster - 12.00 (is this to much? I want turn in to be razor sharp)

SAI - 9.00

Front Toe - 0.5mm Toe Out on each side ( want turn in sharp will it tramline with 0.5?)

Rear Camber - 0.5 ( is this enough?)

Rear Toe 2.0mm In on each side (Will this increse stability? is it ok to have toe out on front and toe in on rear?)

The car sees 80% road and 20% drift and skidpan gets driven fairly hard not babied.

please let me know what you think of these settings :P Also the rear swaybar is on medium as the hard setting decreases traction.

particularly the castor.

I note the lack of shock absorbers on this list, is this just an oversight?

:nyaanyaa: cheers :domokun:

not really SK,

I have not replaced them. They are aftermarket japanese items. They are yellow with blue stickers and all the writing is in japanese. They are around 4 years old and seem to be doing a fairly decent job. so at this stage they will be staying.

Could you do me a small favour. Measure up the wheelbase of the car before & after you wind all that caster in. just curious to see how much it changes. Also curious to see how long the upper wishbone bushes last....

Can do :nyaanyaa: I will measure the wheelbase tonight and once again after the alignment.

I will possibly change the wishbone bushes when the alignment is done if I have the time.

not really SK,

I have not replaced them. They are aftermarket japanese items. They are yellow with blue stickers and all the writing is in japanese. They are around 4 years old and seem to be doing a fairly decent job. so at this stage they will be staying.

What's the ride height?

Should be around 350 mm front and 340 mm rear.

Did you trim the bumsptops when you installed the springs?

:nyaanyaa: cheers :domokun:

Ride height is 350 and 345 and yes new bump stops and covers were put on. an i trimmed them as per the guide

The reason for the questions were that R32 2wd’s simply do not understeer badly unless something is wrong. I didn’t want to get into alignment settings until I was sure that they were the real problem.

So last question, you mention the rear stabiliser bar but not the front, what do you have there and where is it set?

You won’t get 12 degrees of caster on the front, not unless you take out the headlights. Around 7 to 8 is the best you will get.

Can I assume that you aren't running good tyres on the rear and some crap on the front?

:nyaanyaa: cheers :domokun:

The reason for the questions were that R32 2wd’s simply do not understeer badly unless something is wrong. I didn’t want to get into alignment settings until I was sure that they were the real problem.

So last question, you mention the rear stabiliser bar but not the front, what do you have there and where is it set?

You won’t get 12 degrees of caster on the front, not unless you take out the headlights. Around 7 to 8 is the best you will get.

Can I assume that you aren't running good tyres on the rear and some crap on the front?

:P cheers :banana:

Just for a bit more information.

My car was a GTS from factory and had no rear swarbar at all. it has a new engine, gearbox, gtr brakes and all other handling mods listed

once the whiteline bar was added the improvement was dramatic and improved a lot. this was why it was so bad to begin with.

I am now running a standard stabiliser bar on the front and whiteline from the group buy on the rear. (set to medium)

Tyres are 4 new fedral 595's 235/45/17. they are not fantastic but a decent budget tyre. so traction is even on all tyres :banana:

Cheers!

I have had the alignment done and encountered a bit of a problem. The rear lower left control arm bush was stuffed and could not be adjusted. so I have had everything adjusted except the rear toe.

Ended up with

Front:

Castor + 8.00

Camber - 1.50 deg

Toe 1.0mm out each side

Rear:

Camber - 1.50 deg

Toe Left +4.4mm :0 (needs to be fixed!!!)

Teo Right +2.3 :0 (Needs to be fixed!!!)

The front end feels really good now. steering is noticably heavier, turn in is a lot better and steering return is very responsive.

The rear end sucks... it is still a bit wild and needs the toe sorted out. I am also going to get the camber adjusted back to -1.0 deg.

Measurements for wheelbase are at home. I will post them up later.

I have had the alignment done and encountered a bit of a problem. The rear lower left control arm bush was stuffed and could not be adjusted. so I have had everything adjusted except the rear toe.

Ended up with

Front:

Castor + 8.00

Camber - 1.50 deg

Toe 1.0mm out each side

Rear:

Camber - 1.50 deg

Toe Left +4.4mm :0 (needs to be fixed!!!)

Teo Right +2.3 :0 (Needs to be fixed!!!)

The front end feels really good now. steering is noticably heavier, turn in is a lot better and steering return is very responsive.

The rear end sucks... it is still a bit wild and needs the toe sorted out. I am also going to get the camber adjusted back to -1.0 deg.

Measurements for wheelbase are at home. I will post them up later.

I'm confused, the rear lower control arm bush doesn't adjust toe. Toe is adjusted at the tie rod ends, same as the front.

:D cheers :)

I'm confused, the rear lower control arm bush doesn't adjust toe. Toe is adjusted at the tie rod ends, same as the front.

:D cheers :)

strange...

I do not know anything about suspension.

looks like I will need to talk to the place that aligned the suspension. Gary if you have time would you please be able to point out on a diagram exactly where rear toe is adjusted?

or if you can just explain it?

he adjusted toe on the other side so it sounds like he was doing the right thing. it is the Canberra recomended fitter for whiteline stuff and the boss owns a stagea. I am sure you know who I mean :blink:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...