Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 116
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Under hard driving on the street you feel a bit more confident but in reality you are traction limited long before the brakes run into problems even with a quality standard sized setup, so it's not really possible to experience anything extra the G4 kit might give you.

I think it worth emphasizing this point, the tyres are the limiting factor in braking performance in most Skylines, not the brakes themselves. If maintained properly, the standard 4 spot front and 2 spot rear brakes are more than capable of outbraking the best/biggest road tyres you can buy.

:kiss: cheers :D

  • 11 months later...

As far as multipiston theory goes... I always thought it was to give greater leverage on the rotor for the same diameter of rotor. In a racing series brake diameter is limited by wheel size or regulation. You can run bigger rotors by running low profile calipers but also the further out you put the pad the more leverage it has.

Anyway just a theory I made up, so feel free to ignore it. I drew something in MS-paint using the pad on my laptop but then gave up cause it was too hard. Anyway just based on Torque = Force x Length it made sense to me.

post-662-1212072055_thumb.jpg

Thats partly it. The other is a longer pad means more surface area of pad which helps with lower pad temperatures meaning less need for craxy high temp pads. Also the fact that the narrower pad means for a given rotor diam you have a shallower pad which allows you to run a narrower steel rotor with larger alloy hat reducing unspring weight. Also the larger pads means you have less localised heating of the rotor which at high temps can help with the onset of rotor warping. Then you have the more even pad wear...there are a whole bunch of reasons. If i wasnt drunk i could think up some more :wave:

I had the opportunity to look at a set of these last week and I was surprised at how small the mounting hardware is. Grossly undersized in my opinion, flex just waiting to happen. Bolts coming loose is a telling symptom of that problem.

Cheers

Gary

Does anyone have the measurements of these calipers, or a spec sheet?

The design is a knock off of an AP from memory, if I can't get the measurements, does anyone know which caliper they copied?

Cheers

Dane

  • 2 weeks later...

ok well if u guys have only ever heard of these g4 brake calipers coming loose ive seen worse.

r33 gtst here where i live fraser coast has a set of alcon 8 pots front and 6 pot rears. it was driving along behind him and the right rear suddenly locked up solid flat spotting the good ol nankang lol. now like i said alcon like 8 grand of brake front and back and one of the bolts thats hold the caliper to the original bracket had come out and the whole caliper flicked up hitting his 19inch chrome wheels. i couldnt help but laugh at the time cuz all he did was take the caliper off put a set of vice grips on the line and drive it home. either way moral of the story never blame the equipment until proven guilty. and yes loctite always comes in handy.....

now im not saying u didnt do a good job at tightening ur bolts either ok so dont have a go lol.

Does anyone have the measurements of these calipers, or a spec sheet?

The design is a knock off of an AP from memory, if I can't get the measurements, does anyone know which caliper they copied?

Cheers

Dane

I've got a pair of Monobloc 8-piston Brembo's & before they went on the car I put them on the bench side-by-side with a pair of the D2's. From memory they were pretty much identical as per the piston spacings & overall dimensions etc although the pics of the G4's at the start of this thread appear to have a large leading piston & 3 small trailing pistons whereas my Brembo's are staggered big-small big-small.

The other big difference apart from the monobloc construction vs the 2-piece construction of the D2/G4's was where the D2's use on single pad per side, my Brembo's use 2 pads per side with the ability to "quick change" the pads out thru the top so they are effectively 2 sets of 4-piston calipers sharing a common body & hydraulic circuit.

They def seem to be a "knock-off" but whether they copied Brembo directly with regard to the piston specs or copied the AP's which in turn copied the Brembo's (but went to a single pad to avoid patent-infringement etc), I don't know.

...whereas my Brembo's are staggered big-small big-small.

... my Brembo's use 2 pads per side with the ability to "quick change" the pads out thru the top so they are effectively 2 sets of 4-piston calipers sharing a common body & hydraulic circuit.

Thats why your caliper does the big small, big smal differential piston sizes, because as you noted you effectively have two 4 piston calipers in one with you running the two pads. If the caliper only used 2 pads, one each side you would expect the traditional small leading and larger trailing pistons

  • 2 weeks later...

I upgraded to these from the 33/34 brembos. the brembos are rubbish for such a heavy car with so much go. the g4s are 21mm bigger slotted discs, calipers are bigger and lighter, and the pads are about 20% bigger too. No comparison

Great write up, thanks for taking the time!

Guys are the stock GTR brembo's really that bad?? Most people say the stock 33GTSt calipers are much underestimated, and the GTR brembos have got to be a yard ahead of those surely?

Im planning a top end brake upgrade for my GTR and conveniently upgrade my GTS-t with the old brembos front and rear at the same time.

The OE GTR Brembos are pretty good calipers. Problem is when people ask the money they do for them. Its the whole supply and demand thing. There are some other attractive options when you are looking to pay $1600 odd for front calipers with used rotors and pads.

And as far as OE Brembos the Nissan caliper is behind most others fitted to EVOs, STIs, Jags etc

the G4 can take a AP 6pot pad as i got some from from a guy in the BTCC.

As far as i can tell they are a thing of beauty for the money got 2000 kms out of the last set of rotors and its a track only car. I was more than please as they lasted the same amount of kms as my mates RBA 5000 on my mates EVO track car

  • 2 months later...

I just wanted to post somewhere in here that I have now had the opportunity to use the "race" pads that Just Jap sell for the G4's. I have standard rear brakes with BEndix Ultimates in there and find that not only is there no bias issues, I have fixed a bias issue that I believe the car has from factory. I was regularly cooking rear rotors and pads before but now it all runs fine. Lap times are down and the car stops amazingly. I was regularly braking far too early due to being used to the standard setup. With the addition of good tyres and these brakes I knocked 3 seconds off my previous pb at Wakie.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...