Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey dudes

i have rb20det

full inch exhast

600x300x76 intercooler + piping

pod filter

gtr fuel pump

ecu (mines chip)

and just installed new rebuilt rb25det turbo (by steve murch, new bearings still the same wheels)

now before i installed the rb25det the original rb20det turbo was boosting 12psi (about 0.9 bar)

i ran the car for the first time tonight with the rb25det turbo on and the cars power feels the same but its only boosting 0.55 bar???

Should i be buying a boost tap and cranking this to 1 bar (14.7psi)?? and getting what this turbo can really achieve?

have i done something wrong?

if i need a boost tap wat would be the cheapest recommendation???

any help would be great thx

If you didn't swap the wastgate actuators over, that could be it.

and your settings were different bi 0.35bar which is right on 5psi

R32 standard actuator is set to 10psi.

R33 standard actuator is set to 5psi (....i think with the R33 boost solenoid tweaking it to 7psi over 4500)

If that the case (which it looks like it is), spend 20mins swaping the old actuator back in :domokun:

spot on the money birnie.

Since he won't have the 2 stage solenoid, with just an r33 actuator, it runs about 4.5 psi. since he's got a few mods like ic, exhaust etc, it'll run a bit more - that's the 5.5 psi.

pop the 32 actuator in and i won't be suprised with your extra mods if you get 11-12 psi. she'll rip really hard.

spot on the money birnie.

Since he won't have the 2 stage solenoid, with just an r33 actuator, it runs about 4.5 psi. since he's got a few mods like ic, exhaust etc, it'll run a bit more - that's the 5.5 psi.

pop the 32 actuator in and i won't be suprised with your extra mods if you get 11-12 psi. she'll rip really hard.

is it pretty hard to do???

i know how to take pipes off the car and unbolt stuff but do i need to set anything?

cheers

2 bolts to undo on the actuator side, and a 'C' clip on the end where it attatches to the gate.

Put on the R32 one in reverse order and that's it. It should be a straight swap out.

No settings unless you have a boost controller or something to play with

hey dudes

i changed the unit over

and i reset the ecu

boost is now around 10 - 12 psi

but im now loosing power and the engine is slightly popping at 4500 - 5500 rpm

do i need to replace the injectors or fuel regulator or a retune or something?

cheers

FYI,

The spring in the rb25det acuator is 7psi rated. Which is 0.55bar i think?

The 5psi is controlled by the ecu then after 4500rpm it grounds the black wire coming from the elec boost tap deivce and runs 7psi from the actuator.

I ran a rb20 actuator on an r33 turbo and it would run 5psi then after 4500rpm 10-11psi...I cut the black wire going to the ecu and then it never ran 5psi anymore..

Cheers

fyi mzturbo, it is not set at 7 psi. well, not on the stock turbo anyways. With just my stock turbo, I connectected the stock solenoid system up. Because I had exhaust and cooler, I was getting 9psi.

with just the actuator, I was getting 5 psi.

The solenoid is a bleeder. The actuator is 5 psi, it bleeds a little air above 4500 rpm, so it gets a few more psi. not the other way round.

Edited by MANWHORE
boost is now around 10 - 12 psi

but im now loosing power and the engine is slightly popping at 4500 - 5500 rpm

do i need to replace the injectors or fuel regulator or a retune or something?

cheers

the joys of a misfiring skyline

there a billions of threads on misfire

increased boost = harder for spark to jump on plugs = misfiring

solutions? bringing down gaps on plugs = cheapsolution, you still have a weak ignition system

spitfire coil packs = $560 from sliding, it'll fix it

or you could do your own wiring up of igniter's and leads for $100-300, lots more work, theres a few threads about it here and on other sites

intercool is right,

my car done the same thing when is was in R&R mode as it did when it was misfiring.

I had 1.1mm plugs regapped them to 0.6 and the misfiring went completely..

the R&R a tune sorted that out..

ngk bcpr6es which are a .8 gap. It should help with the mis fire unless your coils are absolutely rooted. If it doesn't then either new coils or one of the many fixes that are posted in the maintainence sticky thread.

Dont worry about injectors and regs for now. fix the miss first.

Dude its just a standard RB25 turbo. You really shouldnt need to do much. Just keep gapping the plugs down until it stops miss firing, assuming that sovles the problem. If it does it still means your ignition isnt up to sratch (which is expected as the car is a good 15+yo). You could maybe just put the fuel reg on to be a little safter.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...