Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Ive just built a sub box for my R34 today and thought i'd share the design. I wanted a couple of things out of this box:

- be a suitable volume for a pair of JL Audio 10W0's

- fit snugly enough in the boot so that it was rigidly in place without tying down or bolting in

- removable

- utilise the awkward boot shape effectively

- not require any modification to the boot area

I measured the boot and came up with the following dimensions:

post-28052-1178956578_thumb.jpg

H1 = 190mm = the distance from the floor carpet to the little rise on the mid shelf on the right hand side

H2 = 210mm = the distance from the rise on the right to the underneath of the wiper motor cover

W = 700mm = the distance between the top of the left strut tower and the big rise on the right of the mid shelf

So the box needs to look something like this (hidden detail not shown):

post-28052-1178956772_thumb.png

D = 350mm = arbitrarily chosen to give the desired box volume.

I made a cardboard mock-up to test the fit:

post-28052-1178956806_thumb.jpg

And proceeded to make the box with those dimensions:

post-28052-1178956926_thumb.jpg

post-28052-1178956951_thumb.jpg

post-28052-1178956976_thumb.jpg

The box is ~60ltrs internal, which is just enough volume for those 2 subs in a sealed enclosure. To be sure i didn't lose any volume, i mounted the drivers inverted and stuffed the box with pillow-fill. The amp filled the space on the right side and the fire extinguisher will fit on the left.

If you want to make the same from 16mm MDF, the piece dimensions I used are:

Sides - 350mm(D) x 400mm (H) with a chunk taken out on the bottom/back of 140(D) x 190(H)

Top - 668(W) x 350(D)

Front - 668(W) x 368(D)

Bottom1 - 668(W) x 140(D)

Bottom2 - 668(W) x 210(D)

Back1 - 668(W) x 178(H)

Back2 - 668(W) x 190(H)

When measuring pieces for a box this shape, don't forget:

a) take into account the width of the MDF! (hence the strange piece measurements)

b) make sure the pieces that create the concave back overlap on the inside, so there's solid wood-to-wood on that join.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/168399-sub-box-design-for-an-r34-boot/
Share on other sites

Commendable effort, I like the way you shaped it into a L shape to use the most amount of space possible. Does the rear speaker magnets get in your way at all?

the rear speakers are tucked up higher than the wiper motor, so they're not a problem....not that they actually DO anything with a bloody baby seat anchor through their cones!

would look awesome if you made a board of mdf to cover the wheel wheel bits and covered it in carpet of vynal .. then will look customish :)

nice deign btw.. I installed a amp rack in the same design .. Im trying to do a wheel well sub enclosure .. shit im bad at fibreglass

Dsc00545.jpg

Edited by DECIM8

question for decim8.

seeing as you have a alpine and a fusion amp. I'm guessing the alpine rins the front/rears, the fusion nv class the subs.

Have you noticed a large turn on bang through the subs every time the system is powered up?

would look awesome if you made a board of mdf to cover the wheel wheel bits and covered it in carpet of vynal .. then will look customish :)

the wheel bits? You mean the floor over the spare tyre? There is already the standard floor of carpeted chipboard over the tyre, which is neat enough.

PS: i'm a function-over-form man myself, so anything that's not related to the function of the speakers prolly wont be added.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Great interview on damper settings and coil selection by HPA https://www.facebook.com/HPAcademy/videos/30284693841175196/?fs=e&s=TIeQ9V&fs=e
    • Yeah, it was a pretty deep dig.
    • The values for HID colour are also defined ~ see https://www.legislation.gov.au/F2006L02732/latest/text  ~ goto section 3.9 onwards ....
    • So, if the headlights' cutoff behaviour (angles, heights, etc) are not as per 6.2.6.1.1 without automatic levelling, then you have to have to have automatic** levelling. Also, if the headlight does not have the required markings, then neither automatic nor manual adjusters are going to be acceptable. That's because the base headlight itself does not meet the minimum requirement (which is the marking). ** with the option of manual levelling, if the headlight otherwise meets the same requirements as for the automatic case AND can be set to the "base" alignment at the headlight itself. So that's an additional requirement for the manual case. So, provided that the marking is on the headlight and there is a local manual adjustment back to "base" on the headlight, then yes, you could argue that they are code compliant. But if you are missing any single one of these things, then they are not. And unlike certain other standards that I work with, there does not seem to be scope to prepare a "fitness for purpose" report. Well, I guess there actually is. You might engage an automotive engineer to write a report stating that the lights meet the performance requirements of the standard even if they are missing, for example, the markings.  
    • Vertical orientation   6.2.6.1.1. The initial downward inclination of the cut off of the dipped-beam to be set in the unladen vehicle state with one person in the driver's seat shall be specified within an accuracy of 0.1 per cent by the manufacturer and indicated in a clearly legible and indelible manner on each vehicle close to either headlamp or the manufacturer's plate by the symbol shown in Annex 7.   The value of this indicated downward inclination shall be defined in accordance with paragraph 6.2.6.1.2.   6.2.6.1.2. Depending on the mounting height in metres (h) of the lower edge of the apparent surface in the direction of the reference axis of the dipped beam headlamp, measured on the unladen vehicles, the vertical inclination of the cut off of the dipped- beam shall, under all the static conditions of Annex 5, remain between the following limits and the initial aiming shall have the following values:   h < 0.8   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   0.8 < h < 1.0   Limits: between 0.5 per cent and 2.5 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.0 per cent and 1.5 per cent   Or, at the discretion of the manufacturer,   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The application for the vehicle type approval shall, in this case, contain information as to which of the two alternatives is to be used.   h > 1.0   Limits: between 1.0 per cent and 3.0 per cent   Initial aiming: between 1.5 per cent and 2.0 per cent   The above limits and the initial aiming values are summarized in the diagram below.   For category N3G (off-road) vehicles where the headlamps exceed a height of 1,200 mm, the limits for the vertical inclination of the cut-off shall be between: -1.5 per cent and -3.5 per cent.   The initial aim shall be set between: -2 per cent and -2.5 per cent.
×
×
  • Create New...