Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

HEY GUYS

DOES ANYONE OUT THERE KNOW EXACTLY WHAT THE BOOST SENSOR ON THE R34 GT-T DOES?

I AM HAVING A BOOST PROBLEM THAT OCCURS VERY RANDOMLY BUT OFTENLY WHEN DRIVING HARD. CAR LOSES POWER AND DOES NOT BOOST TO FULL POTENTIAL WHEN THIS OCCURS. IT MAKES A STUTTERY SOUND WHEN HAPPENING.

MY MECHANIC SEEMS TO THINK ITS MY BOOST SENSOR THAT IS FAULTY, BUT I HAVE A FEELING THAT ITS NOT.

DOES ANYONE HAVE ANY INFO / ADVISE?

CHEERS

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/169502-r34-boost-sensor/
Share on other sites

Well, yeah, i realise that, my reply was a bit simplified but i meant id doesn't nothing in terms of engine management etc.

I disconected it cause i have an aftermarket boost gauge and used the original vacuum feed for my boost controller/sensor

Rich and Retard occurs when the Air Flow Meter detects too much volume of air traveling through it and thinks the turbo is possibly overboosting, it than Richens the fuel and retards the timing (this causes it to lose power), essentially a safety feature to try preventing you damaging your car if something goes funny with the wastegate..

Most likely a) you have a turbo back exhaust and the boost is now up at 10/11psi, because you go full throttle it overboosts slightly which could trip R&R..

Get an SAFC or turn your boost down..

OTHERWISE.. it's your coilpacks breaking down at 4,500 rpm like everyone elses, common in R33, not so much in R34.. This can be noticed as you might lose boost and it stutters/missfires than picks up again..

Sewid, you agree?

The GTT NEO engine and engine managment system is different to the R33 so you can't compare them.

Yes the NEO has a "Boost Pressure Sensor" aka map sensor on the back of the engine rocker covers.

Yes it is connected to the engine managment system.

What use this has with regards to fuel and timing functions i don't know if any, it may be either a back up sensor, or used to switch the pollution system purge valves etc (more accurate pollution control) I dunno exactly.

There was however a few threads, where a few GTT owners were fiddling with the outputs from the map sensor to the ecu, trying to run more boost, but you would have to search for those threads. I didn't follow the threads so im unsure what the outcome was...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
    • ..this is the current state of that port. I appreciate the info help (and the link to the Earls thing @Duncan). Though going by that it seems like 1/4 then BSP'ing it and using a bush may work. I don't know where I'd be remote mounting the pressure sender... to... exactly. I assume the idea here is that any vibration is taken up by the semiflexible/flexible hose itself instead of it leveraging against the block directly. I want to believe a stronger, steel bush/adapter would work, but I don't know if that is engineeringly sound or just wishful thinking given the stupendous implications of a leak/failure in this spot. What are the real world risks of dissimilar metals here? It's a 6061 Aluminum block, and I'm talking brass or steel or SS adapters/things.
    • And if you have to drill the oil block, then just drill it for 1/4" and tap it BSP and get a 1/8 to 1/4 BSP bush. The Nissan sender will go straight in and the bush will suit the newly tapped hole. And it will be real strong, to boot.
    • No it doesn't. It just needs an ezy-out to pull that broken bit of alloy out of the hole and presto chango - it will be back to being a 1/8" hole tapped NPT. as per @MBS206 recco. That would be for making what you had in alloy, in steel. If you wanted to do just that instead of remote mounting like @Duncan and I have been pushing. A steel fitting would be unbreakable (compared to that tragically skinny little alloy adapter). But remote mounting would almost certainly be 10x better. Small engineering shops abound all over the place. A lathe and 10 minutes of time = 2x six packs.
×
×
  • Create New...