Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 7 months later...
  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

  • 2 months later...

Reason I asked is my present exhaust has a 95dBA jasma plaque on it & it is only just audible over the tyre rumble. My previous 92dBA exhaust couldn't be heard at all.

The Trust wedsite had JASMA & 94 written against this exhaust - but it may just have been a reference to how many miles away they could hear the sonic boom. Who knows. Maybe they mean with the bunger stuck up it.

THis is a different 80mm type.

https://www.rhdjapan.com/jdm/TRUST-PETi-Pow...2-R33-R34-22075[/url]

Edited by djr81

i'd like to know how much croydon charge for it..

pm time!

titanium exhausts are generally alot louder than steel. they sound so good!

its definatly on my to do list for the track car :P

Edited by Angus Smart
you hooked this baby up yet? i want to hear how mean it sounds.

I have a few videos of this specific/exhaust in question but they are in cabin and... Well not particularly internet friendly so to speak

But yeah its loud but not ear peircing loud

Reason I asked is my present exhaust has a 95dBA jasma plaque on it & it is only just audible over the tyre rumble. My previous 92dBA exhaust couldn't be heard at all.

The Trust wedsite had JASMA & 94 written against this exhaust - but it may just have been a reference to how many miles away they could hear the sonic boom. Who knows. Maybe they mean with the bunger stuck up it.

THis is a different 80mm type.

https://www.rhdjapan.com/jdm/TRUST-PETi-Pow...2-R33-R34-22075[/url]

yep, they would have it at 94 with the bung in. with the bung out it will be very loud. :P

yes you cannot use any removable device (butterfly, bung, steel wool etc) to meet a noise test. it's not a recent chance, been like that as long as I can remember.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Welcome to Skyline ownership. Yes, it is entirely possible parts websites get things wrong. There's a whole world of inaccuracies out there when it comes to R34 stuff (and probably 33 and 32). Lots of things that are 'just bolt on, entirely interchangable' aren't. Even between S1 and S2 R34's. Yes they have a GTT item supposedly being 296mm. This is incorrect. I would call whoever you got them from and return them and let them know the GTT actually uses 310mm rotors. Depending on where you got them from your experience and success will obviously vary.
    • Hi...a bit a "development" on the brakes. I spoke to the guys where i get brakes from...and they are saying that 296mm EBC are for R34 GT-T. I then went to their site: https://www.ebcbrakes.com/vehicle/uk-row/NISSAN/Skyline (R34)/ and search for my car(R34 GT 1998 - it has GTT brakes) and it show me this USR1229 number and they are rly 296mm rotors... So now iam rly confused... The rotors i have now on the car are 310mm asi shown... So where is the problem? Does the whole EBC got it wrong or my calipers are just...idk know what?  
    • Oh What the hell, I used to get a "are you sure you want to reply, this thread is XX months old" message. Maybe a software update remove that. My bad.
    • This is a recipe for disaster* Note: Disaster is relative. The thing that often gets lost in threads like this is what is considered acceptable poke and compromise between what one person considers 'good' looks and what someone else does. The quoted specs would sit absurdly outside the guards with the spacers mentioned and need  REALLY thin tyres and a LOT of camber AND rolling the guards to fit. Some people love this. Some people consider this a ruined car. One thing is for certain though, rolling the guards is pretty much mandatory for any 'good' fitment (of either variety). It is often the difference between any fitment remotely close to the guards. "Not to mention the rears were like a mm from hitting the coilovers." I have a question though - This spec is VERY close to what I was planning to buy relative to the inboard suspension - I have an offset measuring tool on the way to confirm it. When you say "like a mm" do you mean literally 1mm? Or 2mm? Cause that's enough clearance for me in the rear :p I actually found the more limiting factor ISNT the coilover but the actual suspension arms. Did you take a look at how close those were?
    • @GTSBoy yeah sorry i know thery are known for colors bud those DBA are too in colors 🙂 Green will be good enough for me  
×
×
  • Create New...