Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Without chasing too much horsepower (read 220-230rwkw), what are your opinions about intercooler sizing? I've read lots about this but all with reference to 600x300x?? size coolers. From what i'm hearing, the recommended thickness is 67 or 76 or something, which i'm told is good for that sort of power while over 100 in width is too laggy.

Reason I'm prompting this question is would a front mount of proportions such as 470x260x65 be sufficient for these power aims? Is it worth upgrading stock cooler for something this small or is it only beneficial to go to the larger 600x300 core?

Opinions would be appreciated.

Cheers:confused:

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/17068-smaller-fmic-than-600x300/
Share on other sites

Well I'm using a VR4 cooler which is

450 x 210 x 70, and it is good for up to 400HP = about 298 kw.

But then again, these VR4 coolers have proven to flow extremely well. I dont have figures (couldn't find any), but everything I read about these coolers was positive.

I'm guessing the cooler you want should be sufficient, but it all depends on your long term goals. If you will be chasing more power in the near future, then go the bigger. If your goal is 230rwkw, then the smaller one would be better.

As a general rule, I can't see the point of the 300 high cooler as half of it is hidden behing the bumper doing nothing. I have a GTR style front on my gtst and the front opening is only about 220mm high and 700 or so wide, so I can't see the point of going bigger in height unless you cut the bar. I was thinking of getting a custom core made to fit this height or I have also been looking at the VR4 cooler as they seem to be reasonably priced in the second hand places. It good to get a power rating on the VR4 cooler, thanks Zahos. Are you happy yours? The flow rating suits my future plans, is it efficient in dissapating heat? Is there much pressure drop?

Most people buy the 600x300x75 because most intercoolers are that size off the shelf, if you want a custom size it will cost you more. Regardless whether or not your entire intercooler is actually exposed to direct airflow, remember that it is also a heatsink in that it soaks the heat out of the air, the outside airflow cools the intercooler down. So a heavy intercooler will work better than a lighter intercooler of the same dimensions because it's greater mass can absorb more heat, but to be honest the average street car won't get it's intercooler that hot to begin with unless it's tiny, like the stockie.

After a really hard run running 15 psi through the hills my bar and plate on one side feels hot to touch while the other side is cold.

I had a bar and plate 450 x 300 x 87.5 FMIC fitted that increased lag by 100rpm if that. It will handle up to 580hp where there is a 1.5psi pressure drop. I wanted something that was hidden behind the standard front bar yet still have the ability to make 500 od HP.

In australian weather if you want to give it a heap in the heat a bar and plate is the way to go. They do have a little more pressure drop however as they cool the air better but on a street car the difference isn't noticible.

I'll grab a pic and show how it fits.

I've got the trust r-spl fmic its 600x244x76 as you can see from my avatar it fills out the hole we cut in the stock front bar pretty well (i'm searching for a new front bar... 400r possibly). This kit should be good for at least 450-500hp @ flywheel, by the time I do my ecu+turbo I expect to be around the 330-350hp @ wheels mark. I'll probably stop there, not worth pouring more money into the car, just buy a GTR :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...