Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Has anyone got any idea if a RB26 harmonic ballancer is better suited to use on my RB30det compared to using a RB20det ballancer.??

THe RB26 ballancer is a bit bigger and has more weight to it when comparing to the RB20 one.

What are peoples thoughts??

I would recommend a good aftermarket (ATI) rb26 balancer if you want the thing to have a chance of staying together at those revs, the heavier dampner will do a better job of getting rid of harmonics fromm teh crank which is one of the suspected causes of oil pump failure.

I would recommend a good aftermarket (ATI) rb26 balancer if you want the thing to have a chance of staying together at those revs, the heavier dampner will do a better job of getting rid of harmonics fromm teh crank which is one of the suspected causes of oil pump failure.

yah funny you should say this, i was speaking to the some jap guys on tuesday and i mentioned that i was looking for a rb25 balancer to run on cats car to allow me to run r34 r33 gtst pwr steer pump (more crank to rad clearance) but they advised me against it as it is known to increase engine harmonics and oil pump failures.... its seems to be quite a normal swap here.

ill weigh them when i get home, but i dont think there is much weight difference as such between the ati and a std rb damper.

I think its their internal construction with their rubber rings and whatnot that absorbs more vibration and over a larger spread of frequency and converts that to heat more efficiently then a std one. I think they can make them to suit your motor specifically if they had one to test. I believe they say they can tune them (harmonic/frequency wise) to suit your motor and rev range.

ill weigh them when i get home, but i dont think there is much weight difference as such between the ati and a std rb damper.

I think its their internal construction with their rubber rings and whatnot that absorbs more vibration and over a larger spread of frequency and converts that to heat more efficiently then a std one. I think they can make them to suit your motor specifically if they had one to test. I believe they say they can tune them (harmonic/frequency wise) to suit your motor and rev range.

Michael, Im interested to know the weight of the Ati balancer compared to stock if you can weigh it, id be great.

didnt have time to do it this arvo sorry. Tomorrow after work ill be going to parents house to work on race car. so ill weigh it then and report back. Of snap, i think our machinest has it for balancing with the rest of the bottom end. Dammit, forgot about that. Might be a while before i get it back too. My bad peoples.

Michael, Im interested to know the weight of the Ati balancer compared to stock if you can weigh it, id be great.

Saw a nice RB26 POWERBOND balancer thursday at a trade show, 25% underdriven and 4.118kg. They list both differrent RB26 balancers, one for 1991-93 and 1993-on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...