Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

the ethanol is good in a way, as it cleans everything in the engine as it gets passed through. Its almost as good as having water injection except its in the fuel. However because its partially made up by ethanol the fuel isnt as dense and it also burns leaner, so when being tuned it needs to be richened up abit in comparison to normal fuel. By all means you should get a little less economy from a tank because of this. However it does have a higher octane rating, so it sort of works itself out. Think of it like methanol, it burns lean and cold, thats why you need to squirt 2.2 times as much over std fuel. But the octane rating of it is astronomical.

Thats how i see how the ethanol helps, whether its right or not is beyond me.

:D

methanol octane is about 128, ethanlol is about 126. the only down side to a higher octane is that it makes it harder to ignite, that is why you can advance the timing with them.

:D

pretty much sums it up. ethenol reacts with water and moisture.. it can have some side effects.

with the amount of carbon deposits we all have in our engines its prob best u run a tank everyonce in a while..

i hope everyone changes ther fuel filter regularly..?

  • Replies 47
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

V-Power is 98 and V-Power Racing is 100 (also contains 5% ethanol). So at the very least you filled up with 98.

Shell Fuel Finder

sweet, i figured it must be like that and couldn't be bothered...er i mean find that www.shell.com site... :D

haha and what luck, i need to fill my tank tonight!! i might even drive the extra 15 minutes to surfers to try this gear out :D

V-Power is 98 and V-Power Racing is 100 (also contains 5% ethanol). So at the very least you filled up with 98.

Shell Fuel Finder

Thanks for that link SMR33, thats very helpful. :(

Interesting to see the feedback from first time users of the fuel.

At least people know where to get this fuel now.

I'm a little surprised at the price.

I visited Virginia Shell today.

approx prices - Regular Unleaded $1.14, V-Power $1.24, V-Power Racing $1.44

with 5% ethanol I would think that VP Racing shouldn't cost 30c more than regular unleaded.

Other lower octane ethanol based fuels are cheaper.

question for the fuel techs,

would BP 98 or Caltex 98 with an octane booster (ocasional use) be better than the ethanol additive?

Does anyone use octane boosters?

I'm a little surprised at the price.

I visited Virginia Shell today.

approx prices - Regular Unleaded $1.14, V-Power $1.24, V-Power Racing $1.44

with 5% ethanol I would think that VP Racing shouldn't cost 30c more than regular unleaded.

Other lower octane ethanol based fuels are cheaper.

question for the fuel techs,

would BP 98 or Caltex 98 with an octane booster (ocasional use) be better than the ethanol additive?

Does anyone use octane boosters?

I put in a octane booster at track days, no more power or anything but it does knock 15 to 20 points off the max knock that I see on the power FC

I'm a little surprised at the price.

I visited Virginia Shell today.

approx prices - Regular Unleaded $1.14, V-Power $1.24, V-Power Racing $1.44

with 5% ethanol I would think that VP Racing shouldn't cost 30c more than regular unleaded.

Other lower octane ethanol based fuels are cheaper.

question for the fuel techs,

would BP 98 or Caltex 98 with an octane booster (ocasional use) be better than the ethanol additive?

Does anyone use octane boosters?

thats what i meant

the price is set any day during the week now...it does not change with the pump price any more

bloody rip off

Just use BP98 or stick to wotever fuel yer car is tuned with. With octane boosters, only thing is that it screws up the internals of the cat, so it will melt down the internals of the cat and eventually block up the cat, and then u have to replace yer cat.

shell employee signing in

for some reason (i believe it's supply issues, if anyone noticed the 2 week dry spell a month ago) the racing pricechanges dont come through with the other fuels anymore

at the moment it's sitting at about 145, and hasn't changed for a week or more now so i'd say it's not going to change for a while until they fix their supply problems

but shrug, i just work there, i have no idea of how pricing actually works, we just get told when to change it and what to =P

nulon pro strength octane booster and bp ultimate at the correct mixture will bump your octane rating up to over 100 (around 103)

Even using the above it didn't match Shell 100 in my car, safely ran more ignition timing + another 4psi with Shell 100. I actually spoke to one of the techs at Nulon and he said 98 ron + prostrength will make a 98.9 ron mix (from memory) - the increase wasn't huge. Shell 100 is a much better brew......if they have it in stock.

Octane boosters will never be as good as a pure race fuel or 100 octane fuel. I've tested this vpower racing out on both my previous r33 gts-t and my current gtr32, and i have to admit, it runs good, especially since my gtr is tuned in Japan with much higher octane.

question for the fuel techs,

would BP 98 or Caltex 98 with an octane booster (ocasional use) be better than the ethanol additive?

Does anyone use octane boosters?

i like ethanol i think it is a great introduction.. fingers crossed we will be able to run off it more soo as fossil fuels are depleting quickly

octane booster no.. injector cleaners.. are good though

Just use BP98 or stick to wotever fuel yer car is tuned with. With octane boosters, only thing is that it screws up the internals of the cat, so it will melt down the internals of the cat and eventually block up the cat, and then u have to replace yer cat.

yes i agree, to stick with the same octane fuel as tuned.. unless ther car is constantly learning and adapts to different fuels..?

melt cat.. lol as if u would use a car.. GTR didnt have one lol.. ;) 180sx does... for now :)

Even using the above it didn't match Shell 100 in my car, safely ran more ignition timing + another 4psi with Shell 100. I actually spoke to one of the techs at Nulon and he said 98 ron + prostrength will make a 98.9 ron mix (from memory) - the increase wasn't huge. Shell 100 is a much better brew......if they have it in stock.

all i know is that my mate got a hold of an octane tester, and they were the results.

the abbility to run more ignition timing with the shell fuel is because of the ethanol. it burns colder, and less explosive. to get the same sized explosion with ethanol as normal petrol you need to use nearly twice as much. ethanol also takes more spark to ignitite. if you were to run a normal street car tuned for 98 ron fuel on pure ethanol it would run like crap. it would be majorly down on power. the ideal afr for ethanol is around 6:1, and it is much harder to ignite. you would have to advance the timing by over 10 degrees. my mate runs c16 in his drag/street car. when he is running the c16 he advances the timing by 10 degrees.

Is that the first time you have used it, did you notice a difference.

yes it was the first time i used it, i think it made some difference aye, but bcoz it was so cold either my coil packs were breaking down or my car hadnt adjusted to the colder air/fuel yet, bcoz it was breaking down up top end, but that was nothing to do with the fuel.

Edited by 85URK
  • 2 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • HyperGear. Just get a high flow of the stocker. Good, reliable, and should bolt on. Yes it will want things like a retune once done, so you need to factor this in to your spend too.
    • Hi. Iam looking for some "cheaper" bolt on turbo on RB25DET NEO. I do not want "big" power just better reliability than the stock turbo which is "fot now" good but is old and i do not think it has "easy" life. One the Skyline here running some "temu" china Turbo but i dont trust those... Thanks!  
    • Hi guys, Making some space/cleaning up. A whole heap of random OEM R33 GTR parts and other random bits and bobs. I will update this thread as I go. Parts are located in Moorebank NSW 2170. Pickup preferred but will post at buyers expense. Prices are negotiable. If they don’t sell it will go in the bin. Item 1: BOV return pipe. $40 Item 2: RB26 cam gears. $20 Item 3: R33 GTR torque split, oil temp, boost centre gauge. $100 Item 4: RB26 fuel rail x 2. $20 each Item 5: RB26 Recirc valves. $50 Item 6: OEM upper front arms. $20 Item 7: Royal Purple Max Gear 75w-140 1 quart/946 ml x 5. $50 each or 5 for $200. Item 8: OS Giken 80w-250 diff oil 1 litre. $25 Item 9 Eibach springs. ers-11-140-60-0140. $100 https://www.streetfx.com.au/eib140-60-0060-eibach-ers-140mm-length-x-60mm-id-coil-over-spring?_ga_campaignid=22235933977&_ga_adgroupid=180146800292&_ga_keyword=&_ga_device=m&_ga_target=pla-295238231169&_ga_locint=&_ga_locphy=9071723&_ga_matchtype=&_ga_network=g&_ga_device=m&_ga_placement=&_gcl_id=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE&gad_source=1&gad_campaignid=22235933977&gbraid=0AAAAADPiTbo1xAuvnjIWWYnezivf-BUSY&gclid=CjwKCAjwlt7GBhAvEiwAKal0cvkVE_hstv24cDiaICsIk1oznH9zAoJf3By6vR3Tpe7jmByqM6JFHBoCZYAQAvD_BwE    
    • That's kind of what I was getting at saying you'd be here soon regarding length etc being able to add additional restriction.  My assumption (possible donkeys of you and mption) is that the length of hose to an oil cooler, and back, isn't going to be that huge of a loss. Typically you're talking about 1.5m of total length. And so far everyone in our world hasn't had issues with oil not being able to get to a cooler and back, it's more been, how the heck do we get the oil out of the head and back down to the bottom? I'd nearly hazard a guess the biggest issue people have with oil cooling and oil supply, is being able to get the heat out at the cooler itself (not enough air flow, too small of a cooler etc) Also, when people mount them wrong and make really awesome air traps so they've dramatically diminished the cooling capacity.
    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
×
×
  • Create New...