Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

my 33 handles great. and theres no expensive coilovers. most would say it's set up wrong. the car is too low, and the springs are very hard. besides the bumpy ride, it handles great. i'm running 235 fronts and 265 rears.

my point is, imagine if i had an expensive/renowned suspension set up.

i'd have to say skylines handle well.

Soz to kinda hijack this thread.....MANWHORE you mention tyre pressures. I run 36psi front and 34psi rear on 235/40/18s. does that sound right. the car handles pretty well even with stuffed shocks (waiting for funds to buy HKS hyper max 111s)

ANdrew

i'd be running 38 - 40psi on 18's

reason being, low profile = smaller sidewall. higher pressures keep the sidewalls firm.

My old R32 GTR runs most track days with the name super cars, ferrari 360, 430, 599, porsche 993, 996, 997 turbo, 996 & 997 GT3, 997 GT3 RS, 964 3.6 turbo, lambo's of all kinds ( not even going to attempt to spell them ), BMW CSL M3, aerial atoms, caterm, Audi RS6, whole gaggle of evo's and subies.

And to date the only cars that out perform the old girl are the Z06 corvettes, porsche GT2, Carrea GT2 and SR3 & SR8 radicals.

Has to be said though that the slicks made a huge difference to the car,there is not a lot of straightline difference ( except those bloody Z06 ) its through the twisties that my car makes ground on them.

i'd be running 38 - 40psi on 18's

reason being, low profile = smaller sidewall. higher pressures keep the sidewalls firm.

seems a little on the hard side but i will give it a go an see how it goes

Its not too low, u probably find it feels bad because as you said u have fairly average suspension mods and use the extra pressure to mask this and make the car feel more nimble.

cheers tho

Exactly, I use 38psi because I've still got standard suspension on the front and too soft stuff on the back. Why would smaller sidewalls need more pressure to be stiffer? Wouldn't that be the case for larger sidewalls, which inherently have a lot of give in them. Munkyb0y, if you have some sort of proof to back this up then please let us all know, but it doesn't sound that logical to me. 36psi is fine - try anything in the range of 32-40 and see what you prefer with your setup.

Edited by aDrew_C

this is pretty basic stuff. smaller sidewalls need higher pressure. ie, 19's would run 40-42. 17's would run 32-36

check out the tyre placard on a car that comes with 18's from factory. it will have a recommended pressure of around 38.

my mates FPV had 19's, recommended pressure was 40-42psi.

dont let me tell you what pressure to run. do your own research. i have, and i run 38-40psi all round.

No mildly worked skyline gts is ever going to handle great. They're just too big and heavy, an equivalently modified GTiR, Glanza, wrx etc. is always going to leave the gts for dead. I'm very much a fan of skyline's but I know my car is no world beater.

Before I got my full SK setup I'd admit the handling was not impressive at all. I'd even say my parents BA falcon handled better, that's kind of bias though as my car has 11 years of wear and tear on their's. After I installed the new suspension there was a big difference, I'd say the handling is now good and representative of what a skyline should handle like.

Soz to kinda hijack this thread.....MANWHORE you mention tyre pressures. I run 36psi front and 34psi rear on 235/40/18s. does that sound right. the car handles pretty well even with stuffed shocks (waiting for funds to buy HKS hyper max 111s)

ANdrew

The shocks are either stuffed, or they're not stuffed, or they're semi stuffed. IF they're stuffed, doing your tyre pressures isn't going to make it handle well. It'll make it handle as good as it can, with those shocks.

On the street, I run 32/33 psi on both the front and the rear.

i wouldn't discount the handling of the bentley too much - they are worth big money for good reason, they're engineered to the eyeballs and the big weight and unassuming chassis can probably do better than you think. a well tuned suspension/tractioned skyline is surely pretty formiddable, but out of the box, the stock bentley would kill a stock skyline. those things, like most super-luxury cars nowadays hammer!!

that being said, if i was going to spend that sort of money on a car, you can bet your ass it wouldn't be on a bentley

Sure, you would hope that the bentley would have more engineering than the skyline. I'm not saying that bentleys are good or no good, I wouldn't have a clue. But what I can say is that with expensive name cars, the ratio of engineering to cost does not go up linearly. I'm sure you would agree that a lot of the money goes into the name.

Like lets just take an example. A bmw 318i. IMO, it's a piece of junk. No power. No luxuries (everything comes as an option). nothing special in terms of driveability. That car is probably the same amount of 'car' as a mitsubishi lancer 4 door, yet costs 3 times the price.

hey tacker I've been meaning to ask, what sort of power do you have at the wheels? all you need is say 400 and you will kill those corvettes in a straight line and in corners, guys over here like giant are making great power and turning out amazing times in full weight cars.

For road tyres I use between 38 and 42 as well, so try out at that level and see what you think.

Woot. I started a flaming race. Whos Next?? I think I'll stick to my 36 front 34 rear as the tyres seem to have even temperature across the surface and more importantly even wear.

Appreciated though

this is pretty basic stuff. smaller sidewalls need higher pressure. ie, 19's would run 40-42. 17's would run 32-36

check out the tyre placard on a car that comes with 18's from factory. it will have a recommended pressure of around 38.

my mates FPV had 19's, recommended pressure was 40-42psi.

dont let me tell you what pressure to run. do your own research. i have, and i run 38-40psi all round.

Good stuff, I run 38-40 all round also, but I thought I might just be preferring this because of my sloppy suspension.

Cheers

Sorry for the hijack will make up for it with crackin clip.

Duncan i have about 450 hp at wheels or so the sub zero dyno told me. And absolutly no chance of getting near those bloody Z06 corvettes. 7 litre ( 505hp ) and grillions of torque. they are 60% carbonfibre and weight less than 1200kgs. They are not the C5 C6 normal corvette, i can deal with those :-)

Anyone want to travel over they have have a crack at them have plenty of room.

grip and handling are different. handling is the behaviour of the car at the limit. All wider tyres do is raise the limit.

The RSPCA is going to ask me to stop doing things to that dead horse soon..

Yes .. but handling includes oversteer and understeer as well as body roll etc.. with a wider tyre you will most likely drastically reduce slide enhancing handling.. But this goes hand in hand with tyres

In regards to tyre presures.. A good general rule is use is 10% minus you max presure..

I.e 44psi max = 39.6PSI (offhand if i remember correctly) so rounding up to 40PSI for good wear and good handling ..

Just tested this theory with good results in my car with nan krap (kang i mean) went spinning around tight corners with 40psi vrs 36psi and the difference was huge..

personally I think nankrap tyres are really bad, blown up to 40psi I could come out of corners with no wheel spin and fast and it also reached higher rpm before wheel spin in first 5,600 vrs 4,700 they are also about 20% tread..

But I assume this will not work for everyone however I nicked the idea from the tyres guide someone posted a link to one day.. just felt like testing it

I have no results for tyre wear.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...