Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 4 months later...
  • 2 months later...
  • 3 months later...

99 R34 GTT

13.62 @ 110.37mph. 60 ft = 2.55 (1/5/2010)

Was at Calder park for the first time. No past experience and need some practice with the launches. Also running street tyres 235x17 front/back.

Have been told that i should be comfortably making 12's. Running 18-20psi boost, 263rwkw@130Kph, 1045.5NM@90Kph.

Stopped with the runs once i couldn't reverse out of the burnout..think gearbox ok as no issue driving through 1-4, 5& Reverse no go when in gear. No crunching or bad sounds. Told it could be gear selector fork bend (think i said it right). Hopefully back on track in a few weeks.

^ Thats MPH is way to low for 260rwkw.

110mph = around 220rwkw.

110mph is good for around a 12.9/12.8 in a R33 on street tyres (you'll need a 1.9 60ft)

Yeah definitely. I had too much wheel spin in the street tyres. I'll be out with semi-slicks next time which should improve 60ft and time considerably.

  • 2 months later...
  • 3 weeks later...
99 R34 GTT

13.62 @ 110.37mph. 60 ft = 2.55 (1/5/2010)

Was at Calder park for the first time. No past experience and need some practice with the launches. Also running street tyres 235x17 front/back.

Have been told that i should be comfortably making 12's. Running 18-20psi boost, 263rwkw@130Kph, 1045.5NM@90Kph.

Stopped with the runs once i couldn't reverse out of the burnout..think gearbox ok as no issue driving through 1-4, 5& Reverse no go when in gear. No crunching or bad sounds. Told it could be gear selector fork bend (think i said it right). Hopefully back on track in a few weeks.

wat?? 13.6sec??

Im going heathcote this sunday and im hoping for 13's, and im doing only 180rwkw.. lol

  • 4 weeks later...

10.24 at 144 mph and a 2.2 60 ft ongoey r32 gtr james vosilaitis

http://www.fullboost.com.au/records.php?class=10

also id like to mention that this was achieved on street tyres ,thats why the 60 ft was shit

Edited by turbo rxp
  • 3 weeks later...
14.9sec @104.14mph on a wet track at heathcote. Only get to do 3 runs.

Looking for a mid 13's this weekend. And some better tyres.

yeah you should be able to get 13 OK

i was able to do 13.7 with 105mph with a crap diff

so if you have traction and a good diff youll be fine

yeah you should be able to get 13 OK

i was able to do 13.7 with 105mph with a crap diff

so if you have traction and a good diff youll be fine

yeah cool man. Will let u guys know after the day.

Need practice too. 3 runs wasnt enough for my first time.

And being wet doesnt help either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The rain is the best time to push to the edge of the grip limit. Water lubrication reduces the consumption of rubber without reducing the fun. I take pleasure in driving around the outside of numpties in Audis, WRXs, BRZs, etc, because they get all worried in the wet. They warm up faster than the engine oil does.
    • When they're dead cold, and in the wet, they're not very fun. RE003 are alright, they do harden very quickly and turn into literally $50 Pace tyres.
    • Yeah, I thought that Reedy's video was quite good because he compared old and new (as in, well used and quite new) AD09s, with what is generally considered to be the fast Yokohama in this category (ie, sporty road/track tyres) and a tyre that people might be able to use to extend the comparo out into the space of more expensive European tyres, being the Cup 2. No-one would ever agree that the Cup 2 is a poor tyre - many would suggest that it is close to the very top of the category. And, for them all to come out so close to each other, and for the cheaper tyre in the test to do so well against the others, in some cases being even faster, shows that (good, non-linglong) tyres are reaching a plateau in terms of how good they can get, and they're all sitting on that same plateau. Anyway, on the AD08R, AD09, RS4 that I've had on the car in recent years, I've never had a problem in the cold and wet. SA gets down to 0-10°C in winter. Not so often, but it was only 4°C when I got in the car this morning. Once the tyres are warm (ie, after about 2km), you can start to lay into them. I've never aquaplaned or suffered serious off-corner understeer or anything like that in the wet, that I would not have expected to happen with a more normal tyre. I had some RE003s, and they were shit in the dry, shit in the wet, shit everywhere. I would rate the RS4 and AD0x as being more trustworthy in the wet, once the rubber is warm. Bridgestone should be ashamed of the RE003.
    • This is why I gave the disclaimer about how I drive in the wet which I feel is pretty important. I have heard people think RS4's are horrible in the rain, but I have this feeling they must be driving (or attempting to drive) anywhere close to the grip limit. I legitimately drive at the speed limit/below speed the limit 100% of the time in the rain. More than happy to just commute along at 50kmh behind a train of cars in 5th gear etc. I do agree with you with regards to the temp and the 'quality' of the tyre Dose. Most UHP tyres aren't even up to temperature on the road anyway, even when going mad initial D canyon carving. It would be interesting to see a not-up-to-temp UHP tyre compared against a mere... normal...HP tyre at these temperatures. I don't think you're (or me in this case) is actually picking up grip with an RS4/AD09 on the road relative to something like a RE003 because the RS4/AD09 is not up to temp and the RE003 is closer to it's optimal operating window.
    • Either the bearing has been installed backwards OR the gearbox input shaft bearing is loosey goosey.   When in doubt, just put in a Samsonas in.
×
×
  • Create New...