Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi everyone,

Could someone please help me with my r32 skyline? Basically I've ran over a kerb, and I broke the castor rod and bent the control arm (front left). I've bought new one and tried to put it back in myself. however, it wont seem to go in... like it's not allign... I dunno if I've damaged the chasis also or maybe the strut aswell. Here's are some pics of it any comments would be appriciated thanks.

post-29533-1182917753_thumb.jpg

post-29533-1182918194_thumb.jpg

post-29533-1182918358_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/174408-hit-a-kerb-need-help/
Share on other sites

Did the same thing a year or so ago now and i know how much it hurts. Id suggest getting the car to a mechanic or at least a wheel/suspension repairer as there can be some "unseen" problems. Essentially when i did it the damage was only minor but it still needed to be checked on a chassis aligner, which as one of the checks to make sure the chassis rails are still aligned. If the accident was low speed then you should be ok.

Secondly i damaged my hub without knowing it and had to replace it. You will be suprised what a slow speed gutter collision will do!

Have you tried fitting the x-member end first, then connecting the hub?

That would be my advice as well. Then fit the castor rod to the LCA, then pull the hub forward and drop it onto the ball joint.

Check for other bent stuff too. The sway bar link is sitting at a funny angle, but that may be due to the lack of a castor rod to pull everything forward

yeah I tried that still wont do it, is it meant to be an easy fit or are you meant to force it in? also could the strut be fuekd?

I got the x member in and it went it pretty easily it just I cant get the hub in its been pushed back I think... so does this mean there's no chasis damage since I managed to get the castor rod and lower suspension arm in?

Edited by gtst7
yeah I tried that still wont do it, is it meant to be an easy fit or are you meant to force it in? also could the strut be fuekd?

I got the x member in and it went it pretty easily it just I cant get the hub in its been pushed back I think... so does this mean there's no chasis damage since I managed to get the castor rod and lower suspension arm in?

There's no "strut".

Disconnect everything - hub, sway bar, castor rod - from the control arm.

The arm should be a tight fit into the x-member, and may need a spot of "persuasion" (if you get my drift). The hub will slop around because it's only held by the upper control arm. Once you have the arm attached and bolted to the x-member, the hub can be swung into position and connected to the ball joint. Now you can start thinking about connecting the castor rod and sway bar.

The castor rod forms the third side of the triangle to keep the wheel in position, so you may need to lever the hub assembly into position so the castor rod can be connected to the control arm. Connect the castor rod to the chassis first. Then move the control arm / hub to meet the castor rod.

Just studying the photos again. It looks like the link pin on the sway bar might be interfering with the positioning of the hub. Try tucking it back down away from the hub.

Also, is the car jacked up on both sides? Jacking up one side only loads the sway bar and can create difficulties getting stuff to line up properly.

My son did the exact same thing to his r32.

He broke the radius rod and bent the lower control arm back.

It bent the back of the crossmember backward from the LCA inner bush bolt outward.

After we straightened it and put it all back together with a new arm and radius rod he refused to pay for a wheel alignment and wore out a new set of tyres in 3 months.

When he finally got a wheel alignment he found the wheel was still pushed back 14mm.

We fitted another radius rod support bracket to fix it.

Even though the old one didn't look seriously bent it was.

Compare the LHS of your crossmember with the RHS side to see if it's bent.

Get a wheel alignment when your done.

yeah I jacked it up on both side... cant really see ne diff cept the strut seems a bit bent on the crash side... I mean can the strut actually be the solution?

By the strut do you mean the hub and knuckle upright assembly?

I don't think it bend in my son's car but it's hard to tell because it's not straight in the first place.

If it is bent it would cause all sorts of problems.

my car had same problem when i bought my R34 GTT

may be it was from japan... the caster rod was bented and left had side tire was wearing out sosososososo baddly....

i had to buy adjustable caster rod and changed them to adjust... my whole front bit was bented little bit... no one can tell its bented but if you see the nose part i see the bonnet and body doesnt lined properly... anyway... if your front bent due to that problem... adjustable caster rod will do. and wheel alighnment..

my tire is not wearing out anymore.. im happy now anyway

its all good unless i put NOS on....lol

good luck

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...