Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its not bracks fault that his son is stupid.....the kid should have been more aware as his father is premier of vic....but i cant see the kid getting the full force of the law....probably will get a friendly finger wave from the judge.....

No one's saying it's Bracks fault (well it is actually, it's Bracks Jnr. hehehe) we are just wrapped that his own laws will bite him now :(

true true...haha that kid is bracks jnr man...he looks just like his father ahhahahaha

btw...did everyone see the news? man that kid must have been going pretty fast if that saab (which is build like those old volvos - unbreakable) had that much damage :rant:

forsees future headlines...

"President of Australia Steve Bracks blames his sons homo errotic porno home movies with Rove McManus Jr on a spiked drink... it seems once again the phantom drink spiker strikes again. After a slue of incidents from the age of 18, Bracks Jr has been the victim of numerous unfortunate attacks from the Phantom Drink Spiker.

Blammed now for Bracks Jrs drunken rampage at schoolies in 2005, a torrent of drunken car accidents, a number of public nudity charges including running at the Queen of England yelling out "Get a load of these crown Jewels ya skank!" and now the number one reason behind his home movies where he embarks in a number of homo errotic encounters with other public figures sons."

he should get the following.

1 year losse of licence.

loss of car for 3 months.

and do defenceive driver trg.

man his dad would have known his son was driveing the saab but let it go couse he didn't know that it was turbo or that it had being put on the baned list

Yes I find it funny that when someone elses child has an accident and they harden the laws and blam the parents but when it is one of there own well things change they say it was a somone else who caused it and as a parent they did all they could to educate them to make ther own choices. WHAT THE F#C# ever

well well, had a read of the herald to day and saw that the saab was a 900I.

an illegal car for p-platers as it is a 2.2L turbo from memory. i have driven them and they are resnerbly quick.

so charges i see.

drink driveing

dangerous diveing

driveing under the influance

driveing a high powered vechile.

sentince

jail

yeah but its the premiers son we are talking about here.. if we did it, we will go to jail for life and then on death row.. but no its his son.. 1 year loss TOPS and a slap on the wrist... f**kEN cops!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstah, no, coilovers aren't illegal, especially as a bolt straight in. The illegal part will be if they're altering suspension geometry beyond factory limits, or the ride height is not legal.   Sounds like the blue slipper just didn't want to deal with any later possibility of mods appearing on the car.
    • The problem has always been that coilovers are able to be adjusted, almost at any time, to be too low. Most people who ever get/got defected for/with coilovers were actually afoul of the minimum ride height rule. So the interpretation by cops/inspectors was always that it is pointless to allow numpty to raise his coilovers and get the car inspected/cleared, then just drop them back down again as soon as they get around the corner from the inspection station.  This led to the interpretation that they were illegal unless rendered such that they can't be adjusted (ie, collars welded to the body, that sort of thing). That may or may not have ever actually been the official line, but I'm pretty sure it's not considered to be a solution these days. Coilovers themselves fall under clause 3.2 b of that manual, because they are an "installation of a variable ride height system" and they don't fit the exclusions in that clause (which point to air springs and other pneumatic adjusters). So, as per previous statements, they require engineering cert to be legal on the road. Once you have such cert, provided you do not adjust them outside the height range covered by the cert, you are OK. Without, you have an unroadworthy vehicle.
    • Here E10 is the cheapest fuel. And general advice is to not use it unless you hate your car. From what I remember it clogs up stuff in the fuel system or injectors?  With US/Canada being E10 across the board, does that mean that all fuel there is terrible?
    • Sorry, are coilovers ACTUALLY ILLEGAL in NSW? They aren't in Vic, as long as they retain 70% of stock travel and the car is above 100mm off the ground. Does NSW actually have a law making coilovers actually illegal? RWC/Blue Slip/Engineering people not knowing the actual f**king laws boils my blood. Demand them to point to the documentation that states a coilover is illegal. (it may exist in NSW ) Edit: I checked. They aren't. https://www.nsw.gov.au/sites/default/files/2021-02/RMS-infosheet-light-vehicle-modifications-manual-suspension-and-ride-height.pdf
×
×
  • Create New...