Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

its not bracks fault that his son is stupid.....the kid should have been more aware as his father is premier of vic....but i cant see the kid getting the full force of the law....probably will get a friendly finger wave from the judge.....

No one's saying it's Bracks fault (well it is actually, it's Bracks Jnr. hehehe) we are just wrapped that his own laws will bite him now :(

true true...haha that kid is bracks jnr man...he looks just like his father ahhahahaha

btw...did everyone see the news? man that kid must have been going pretty fast if that saab (which is build like those old volvos - unbreakable) had that much damage :rant:

forsees future headlines...

"President of Australia Steve Bracks blames his sons homo errotic porno home movies with Rove McManus Jr on a spiked drink... it seems once again the phantom drink spiker strikes again. After a slue of incidents from the age of 18, Bracks Jr has been the victim of numerous unfortunate attacks from the Phantom Drink Spiker.

Blammed now for Bracks Jrs drunken rampage at schoolies in 2005, a torrent of drunken car accidents, a number of public nudity charges including running at the Queen of England yelling out "Get a load of these crown Jewels ya skank!" and now the number one reason behind his home movies where he embarks in a number of homo errotic encounters with other public figures sons."

he should get the following.

1 year losse of licence.

loss of car for 3 months.

and do defenceive driver trg.

man his dad would have known his son was driveing the saab but let it go couse he didn't know that it was turbo or that it had being put on the baned list

Yes I find it funny that when someone elses child has an accident and they harden the laws and blam the parents but when it is one of there own well things change they say it was a somone else who caused it and as a parent they did all they could to educate them to make ther own choices. WHAT THE F#C# ever

well well, had a read of the herald to day and saw that the saab was a 900I.

an illegal car for p-platers as it is a 2.2L turbo from memory. i have driven them and they are resnerbly quick.

so charges i see.

drink driveing

dangerous diveing

driveing under the influance

driveing a high powered vechile.

sentince

jail

yeah but its the premiers son we are talking about here.. if we did it, we will go to jail for life and then on death row.. but no its his son.. 1 year loss TOPS and a slap on the wrist... f**kEN cops!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
×
×
  • Create New...