Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Id be happy to organise it for you, but Freight would be no less than $20 which i think would make it too expensive. Are you sure there is no where else in Sydney it can be purchased from?

uhh yea thanks.. The ones I ordered have arrived..

Thanks though!

  • Replies 175
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

So you will get it twice as fast!

Twit

Lets not make promises i cant keep LOL

Thanks Ash. Ill let you know when i have them, then you can PM the adress's you want them sent to. Dont give it to me yet as ill lose the details LOL

These are the people that i have not received payment from yet. (I relise some people have EFT so if your name is on here, it just means it hasnt cleared on my statement yet so please dont get up set with me)

Stritch9

342four Waiting clearance

bubba

Lukits01

7yphon

ossie21

frOst

px29

Woodys

Bok Bok Gun

Ztuned

3rik

Skyryan

LAch32 Waiting Clearance

sam5709

WhitehotR33

Pism

Munster

Thrtytwo

I will update it in a couple of days as i know for a fact there is funds waiting to clear from some people.

Most people have contacted me when they pay EFT and it usually takes couple of days to clear so disregard this if your name is up there.

^^ Likewise, I thought NAB > NAB would have happened pretty quickly.. they did change cutoff times recently though.. I'M NOT SHAMED BECAUSE *I* KNOW I'VE PAID!

P.S. let me know when the bandwagon is travelling past so I can jump on and hassles the non-payers :(

My accountant (wife) checks it most nights and marks off whos name is there. There was 2 there last night with out names, however apparently it can take a day or 2 for the reference to be put next to the payment....so lets not worry yet.

they are a very good price but be aware of their rating of 1A:10BE. a comparable other brand 1kg extinguisher is rated at 1A:20BE so it is basically twice as good for fighting type B, C and E grade fires. Class B is flamable liquid and is most probably the type you will end up using it on (either oil or fuel fires). they are still suitable, and still fairly good value for the money, but it's worth being aware of.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
×
×
  • Create New...