Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Well I just picked my car up from RE the other day after a tune and I am extremely impressed with the results and thought I'd share them with my fellow SAUers, aswell as get any thoughts or comments. A big thanks goes out to Ray, I'm sure his more than sick of hearing my voice now. I can't reccomend him highly enough, I'm over the moon with the result, everybody who rides in my car can't believe how responsive it is for a 280 rwkw car. Now to build a new motor so I can ram more boost down it's throat without worrying about melting it.

Mods are:

Apexi PowerFC

HKS 3037 (.68 exhaust housing)

Trust highmount manifold

HKS 50mm external gate

Deatchwerks 550cc injectors

Bosch 040

3 inch straight through exhaust

Hybrid FMIC

Q45 AFM

Splitfire coils

DynoGraph2.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/179306-recent-tune-results/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Cant complain with those results man, nice work.

You must be over the moon as I could imagine, must be sweet to drive especially with that power curve!

Is it just a stock RB25 internally?

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu

Yeah mate I'm rediculously happy with the outcome, I was thinking more like mid 260 rwkw region, which is around what it makes on low boost! It's an absolute DREAM on the street (well as much of a dream as that power can be). As for the engine, yeah its bog stock internally but I'm looking to get one built in the near future not so much for power, but more for piece of mind as i dont want to go melting an engine.

Edited by ardie
Yeah mate I'm rediculously happy with the outcome, I was thinking more like mid 260 rwkw region, which is around what it makes on low boost! It's an absolute DREAM on the street (well as much of a dream as that power can be). As for the engine, yeah its bog stock internally but I'm looking to get one built in the near future not so much for power, but more for piece of mind as i dont want to go melting an engine.

Thats awesome man, for bog stock motor. 279rwkw is massive.

Must have some serious traction issues now lol

Looking at getting CAM's or anything for it at all?

How much boost did it take to get to 279rwkw?

Thanks,

Abu

Edited by abu

Yeah its a handfull on the road, at full noise 1st and a fair bit of 2nd gear are useless when hard shifting. It's made the car soo easy to slide now, on the straight, just clutch and then throw it a little and then balance the car with the throttle, my mate in his 2535 powered 33 cant keep up with me when we do slalems now, REVENGE!!!

As for the CAMS, I'm looking into purchasing a built motor off a guy on here, it comes with stage 1 HKS cams. Otherwise I'm going the build my own.

That power was made on only 16 psi, but it drops 1 psi over the graph as the boost controller wasnt fully worked out, but I've since sorted that, so theoretically it should have actually made a smidgen more power.

Although its a drift car, it still can make for some quick runs on the streets, I dispatched a worked V8 torana today on the way home from work, only 2 have the guy say how awesome the gate sounded, AN ENGINE NOTE COMPLIMENT FROM A V8 OWNER!!!! WTF!?!??!

nice curve, good ramp, nice average power

you boost build is ideal at 3300rpm where it ramps to 15psi aggressively (how is traction?)

km/h - 3037 - stock turbo

=============================

65 - 40rwkw - 60rwkw

75 - 60rwkw - 90rwkw

90 - 85rwkw - 110rwkw

100 - 150rwkw - 120rwkw

110 - 189rwkw - 135rwkw

120 - 196rwkw - 165rwkw

130 - 225rwkw - 170rwkw

140 - 235rwkw - 180rwkw

160 - 270rwkw - 182rwkw

questions;

have you got any pics of the manifold?

have you got any pics of the turbo flange?

what a/r is the compressor?

got a pic of the compressor snout?

i had my r33 series 2 to 233kw at the wheels, and i couldnt launch in that car... i would be spinning my 265's all the way untill 3rd gear if i wanted to. So to have even more i can just imagine....

Seriously though if the engine is stock.... i dont want to jinx you but having that much power on a stock motor is like you caring 800kgs on your back everyday...

But other than that congrats dude

Hey Paul, thanks for that comparison, its nice to actually have a solid evidence of my progress. As for traction, through 1st its non existant, 2nd it hooks up at about 5 grand and just takes off from there. Admittedly, my suspension is set up for drift with stiff zeal coilovers all round (cant remember the rates off the top of my head). The best thing about all of this is the satisfaction I get from driveing something I built.

Milan: The car didnt even hit knock levels at 16psi which is all it ever sees now that I've sorted the boost control and it carries nice afrs throughout the rev range. On here its a pretty normal occurance to see rb25s running 300rwkw throughthe likes of gt30/40's and 35/40's on stock internals. But I still dont like running it internally stock, hence why I'll be getting an engine built within the coming months and then aiming for spot on 300rwkw (around 20 psi should see me there). Im just thinking to stick with the 25, or go 25/30 and a bigger exhaust housing, any suggestions?

Edited by ardie

wow thats unexpected , nice work khunjeng (mr cool)

you almost have even better response and with internal gate and stock manifold

not expected at all - nice work

youll notice the td06 has a fatter peak when it ramps up

but who has the mysterious td06 setup....

wow thats unexpected , nice work khunjeng (mr cool)

you almost have even better response and with internal gate and stock manifold

not expected at all - nice work

youll notice the td06 has a fatter peak when it ramps up

but who has the mysterious td06 setup....

yeah thats what I wanted to comapre...cos I never have. different dyno's etc but I have build my cra from stock and the stock result was pretty much as expected so I think its accurate enough for a good comparision..

I suspect my CAS is dodge cos I'm getting inconsistant tunes..this result was the lastets b4 i buggered my leg. I will replace the CAS and go again. My guys reckon its not comming on hard enough...

thats on 1.2 bar btw.

bit of the thread hyjack! hehehe

if the cas is bugged your timing would either be in front or behind

that is the FC woudl expect your timing to be say 15 and it could either be say 10 or 20

so on max load ramped up you woudl be near 20deg ign timing but cos your CAS is off it coud be say 15 deg so its under and can do with some more timing or its over (say 25deg) and its on the peak of detonating but you should be making more power if that makes sense. basically the ecu and PFC dont know what the CAS is dialed in at so if its out of whack it thinks base timing is 15deg when it could be 12deg or 22deg. it bases its level of timing around that, so if its wrong you will either deontate your asss of at liek 15deg on max load (way too loo) or make f**k all power near 20deg timing (too high)

i had a guy email me a few times from some other state he was detonating his ass off and making jack all power and on max load he was near 10deg ign timing

its way too low and turns out the CAS he was using was off the planet so at idle PFC assumes 15deg but it was more like 5deg or something stupid

well anyway you get the drift - if the CAS is out of whack your timing wont match your power levels

most normal gtst's max around 20deg ign timing and make good power and a bit of detonation

if you make like 150rwkw and are running 20deg ign timing then your cas is off the planet and dialed backwards (ie 20 isnt 20 its more like 10)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...