Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Does that make 2 Koenigs in Sydney?

Saw the yellow Koenigsegg that's in the current issue of MOTOR on Silverwater road today. Every one of the construction workers at the building site next to the Goodyear shop stopped and stared at it. lol
Niiiiice

seriously steve. ROTATE FARKEN. it's much easier to just click "rotate" than it is to have 30 people try and rotate their heads to look at the pic. in fact your camera should do it automatically.

Demir family have cars with plates from DEMIR..A to something like Z man, all exotics.

i have a regular client of mine who owned a Mac F1 1st in oz.

just an example, 599GTB 1st in oz too (yep the very one that was at Sydney motor show few years back, it was actually his.

the 1st RR EX100 before John Laws got his.

Demir family have cars with plates from DEMIR..A to something like Z man, all exotics.

i have a regular client of mine who owned a Mac F1 1st in oz.

just an example, 599GTB 1st in oz too (yep the very one that was at Sydney motor show few years back, it was actually his.

the 1st RR EX100 before John Laws got his.

What sort of work do you do?

N1GTR, i run a pro audio visual installation dude.

that porsche that you saw might be another client of mine also, its the orange RS, black wheel all carbon fibre interier and caged. if im not wrong its 1 of 3 in the country. if you go to wakefield regularly, the owner take it out once a month

N1GTR, i run a pro audio visual installation dude.

that porsche that you saw might be another client of mine also, its the orange RS, black wheel all carbon fibre interier and caged. if im not wrong its 1 of 3 in the country. if you go to wakefield regularly, the owner take it out once a month

You mean a car one? or a home theatre one? Thats pretty cool!

Yeah all orange RS's have the black wheels and cages, i just love them! If you know when he's going to wakie next let me know - ill go down and watch :rofl:

Yeah ive been in a normal gt3 going faster than we shoudve been, but to be honest, we have an R1 in the family and an RS will have nothing on a decent straight compared to an R1 :rofl:

Depends on the track i guess

Anyway yeah if you hear about it going to the track let us know in this thread so we can get some pics please - they're my fav car, even the GTR loses that battle for me, RS is just the best

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...