Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I think you'll find the story is that any parts on the car when it is shipped to Aus need to be destroyed before the car can be complied.

There is nothing in the import rules stopping you from modifying a car after you get it in Aus. This might be with parts that used to be on the car in jp.

If you were working in an industry that has just had a very deliberate crack down would you be sticking your neck out?

I can tell you this if you are unsure, ask your BROKER who is complying your car then ask who the workshop is and what will they do with the aftermarket parts and you want the answer in writing.

Or just deal with J-SPEC as Craig asked these questions a long time ago and has always told the truth and will show you the answer in writing.

Look guys read this simple as that dont believe anything unless it is writing.

14. Disposal of Non-Complying Parts

The workshop must have procedures and records to confirm that all non-complying parts removed from vehicles are either re-exported or destroyed. While the tyres on the imported vehicle still have to be replaced with new tyres, the tyres removed from the vehicle do not need to be destroyed. However, records need to be kept to show where the removed tyres have gone.

http://raws.dotars.gov.au/raws_online_guide.htm

Hmm. I e-mailed this to Geoff - he responded with:

We have spoken with the compliance workshops about this specifically and they have advised that despite being written into the RAWS guide there has been no confirmation of this from DOTARS themselves.  The workshops that are already operating are not destroying the parts, rather removing and replacing them with complying items.  If you would like to speak to one of them to feel safer, let me know and I'll supply contact details.

The car sits at the workshop until they gain their RAWS and if they dont get it the car is re-exported or destroyyed.

I know of people holding cars since January waiting to finish their RAWS.

I would be hesitant to let some people use my car as a test vehicle it would have to be somebody you had a lot of trust in.

  • 2 weeks later...

How would someone prove or disprove that parts were destroyed. Is the method for part destruction outlined somewhere?

All the workshop would have to do is keep a log book of parts removed and destroyed, and they are in the clear.

They can say the parts were crushed for scrap metal when really the parts were just given back to the original owner with no receipt or record.

This whole parts fiasco seems very stupid and pointless to me anyway. If the car is road worthy with the aftermarket parts on then what is the problem?

Originally posted by J-Spec Imports

EXACTLY - it is not going to be a cheap process, even with cheap original parts in Japan .. you will need to have "friend" over there that can do all of the running around for you..

Might I be of assistance?:P

I would destroy the parts, take photos of the parts and keep on hand a reciept from the scrap metal yard.

Or just dont bring in the cars with all the modified parts to make life easy.

I can tell you this if or when I have a RAWS I wouldnt bring in the car for somebody who says throw away $50,000 and your only income so some snot nose kid can save a couple of grand on a unroadworthy car that dosent pass ADR's.

It is as plane and simple as that, so I dont know why people are still complaining on this forum, like it will make a diference in DOTRS eyes.

Why not help people through the new rules not complain about them.

Driver, a modified car cannot be imported and complied under the new scheme.

The complier needs to provide proof the parts were destroyed.

The owner of the car would be responsible for the cost of replacing the parts. If you have bought via a broker, *you* are the owner.

Modified cars *can* be bought in if they are:

1) Older than 15 years old

2) Are a personal import that you have owned for more than 12 months overseas

3) For race or rally use only.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Manual boost controllers (where a little of the boost was bled off) were quite common back in the day, because they were cheap and easy. Generally they had a manual adjustment screw rather than being fixed like yours. Down side is they always bleed boost, not just when you want them to so an electronic boost controller that uses a solenoid will have less lag.
    • Hello , im new here and i have A31 home build  RB25det neo stock eng / turbo  aem ems 2 blue connector  aem 3.5 map aem cas disk aem wideband connected to ecu  355 lph pump 550 nismo yellow injectors side feed aftermarket regulator  and won’t start with base aem tuner basic tune eventually flipped cas 180 degree so it triggers on correct stroke not in exhaust cycle  Now it won’t start Wideband reads 10 and 11 at lowest fuel setting  and will share calibrations soon for aem tuner i think something is wrong in aem tuner    please if you have any information, am very grateful         
    • Legend. I ended up finding the facebook account of the owner of the first car i sent but sadly he deactivated the account. I think you’re right in saying it’s some sort of well done custom job. Really appreciate your help anyways.
    • Totally equivalent. Stock often goes from the comp cover because that's where the actuator is also installed and the factory needs 2" of hose to make the connection - and it comes as a pre-assembled unit. They totally have a boost reference from somewhere between the turbo and the throttle(s). Oh, jeez. Just do it in M12 then. We don't actually care that much. I would expect any such AN converter fitting to rely on an o-ring or some other seal onto a flat surface under the flange of the hex**, because bolt threads are no intended to provide a pressure seal. unlike..... pipe threads. **which also requires a suitably flat and smooth surface on the turbo's boss to provide the seal.
    • I also used NP   That’s were it’s seems to be the best place to fit it? All schematic shows also that it’s should be referenced from the turbo housing. But idk, I do see high hp cars without any connection or anything to their turbos, so I really don’t know how they connect their things
×
×
  • Create New...