Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

sup guys i have done some pretty serious engine mods recently, >_< and need to upgrade my afm.

is it possible to run the z32 or q45 off the stock ecu with a SAFC?

dont even think about saying "buy a pfc" ITS NOT GONNA HAPPEN :):):rofl:

would like to know if stock ecu (remapped or standard) and a SAFC will run it.

please only have clear answers

cheers :)

Edited by r33cruiser
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/184709-another-z32q45-question/
Share on other sites

Hey buddy

The SAFC is a fuel only computer, so short answer no you wont be able to run the Z32 off it. That also applies to after market injectors.

You can run the Z32/Q45 with a REMAP ECU with no issues, but if you were to go with a REMAP or any form of after market stand alone ECU (WOLF, MICROTECH, PFC etc) there would be no need for a SAFC as the REMAP, WOLF, PFC, MICROTECH will do EVERYTHING for you.

An SAFC is only a fuel only computer, piggy back, which alters the signals from the ECU, where as a REMAP is basically a full retune of the standard ECU.

Hope that helps.

Edited by abu
I'm pretty sure these units have the ability to change the airflow curve to suit a different MAF.

Its worth reading up to find out.

Got any links to the documentation on these units?

I got heaps of shit at home man, manuals etc but currently at work.

I remember when I bought my SAFC II, I was assured that Z32 wouldn't be supported along with after market injectors.

SUPER AIR FLOW CONVERTER is what SAFC stands for, which does actually imply in a way that it should be able to configure a Z32.. according to air flow signals.

But it's all a bit technical for me.

Will get supporting documentations up for everyone tonight once I get home.

Abu

Edited by abu
If you've done enough mods to warrant a bigger AFM.

Then that also warrants a decent ECU. Not a band-aid like a S-AFC

That is true.

An SAFC is just like a temporary solution/supplement... best to get a tune done, that will show the best results/gains.

Even a piggyback ECU such as E-MANAGE will show you good results at a lower cost than say a PFC.

Edited by abu
Hey buddy

The SAFC is a fuel only computer, so short answer no you wont be able to run the Z32 off it. That also applies to after market injectors.

You can run the Z32/Q45 with a REMAP ECU with no issues, but if you were to go with a REMAP or any form of after market stand alone ECU (WOLF, MICROTECH, PFC etc) there would be no need for a SAFC as the REMAP, WOLF, PFC, MICROTECH will do EVERYTHING for you.

An SAFC is only a fuel only computer, piggy back, which alters the signals from the ECU, where as a REMAP is basically a full retune of the standard ECU.

Hope that helps.

that's not right mate. SAFC alters air flow signal which actually affects fuel AND timing. and yes it can be used with a Z32 AFM on an RB25 and can probably cope with larger than stock injectors. so will it work? yes it will. is it ideal? no it's not. if you are upgrading injectors and AFM then something like a Power FC is a wiser choice. but if you are set on it the SAFC II will still work.

safc II can convert a z32 afm signal to a signal to match your car, its part of the setting up. it asks what type of signal is inputted and what signal you would like to output. and you can run larger injectors, the safc has nothing directly to do with them, just changes afm signal and then the ecu changes its output signal to the injectors. one thing to keep in mind is like what Beer Baron said, your timing is also effect by these changes.

safc is only ideal for slight afr changes, like a tune for a car with exhuast, air filter, fmic and boost up a bit.

whats your reason for staying with the stock ecu?

wow lot of info there, thanks guys.

the SAFC is the series 1 SAFC not the 2nd one.

will this still work?

also, i would like to get a pfc, but feel it is a waste of money as i am only aiming for 260+rwkw, i know it is always good, but dont want to waste the money on it.

although, if the price is right i might consider it

so will a safc 1 work with a z32, also i am putting in some 550cc injectors aswell, been told by chapmans that they do it all the time.

anyone out there actually done it>????

thanks for ur advice guys

Edited by r33cruiser

you dont judge if a powerfc is justifiable or not by rear wheel killowats

its judged on user ability, car response once tuned and how it performs over all

ive got a powerfc at 190rwkw and its the best thing ive done to the car of all of my mods

i couldnt recommand a stand alone ecu (setuip correctly) high enough out of all the mods anyone would do to a skyline

sure if powerfc isnt your thing, then go greddy or remap or motec or autronic or link or SOMETHING etc etc

the point is, get a real ecu or remap the bastard and the car becomes a new car

once all the load points are tuned (regardless of ECU) the car should drive like a different car

thats what you pay the $1000 for. for the amazing throttle resspone, for the good economy, for the rapid boost build and torque when u need it

forget about rear wheel killowats

if you go for 260rwkw with injectors, afm etc and you do actually get it working properly (good luck)

you will spend ages mucking around, the tuner will get angry and take longer (cost $$$)

and youll end up with a big comprisemise and you have to tippy-toe around deontation cos the piggyback dials in more timing automatically (part of the nature of bending the afm signal)

by all means do it and save $1000 etc but another guy with 220rwkw and a good tune on a real ecu will smash you in all of the usual comparisons, average power, ramp up power, boost build, lag, response, ability to smoke tyres etc

the tune is the biggest thing here, get that right, and the car should be the best, regardless if you use 480cc or 520cc or 11psi or 13.34psi etc etc...

omfg, you thoguht you were going to "omly" go for 260rwkw with a safc1?

Your delusional.

You're only option is a powerfc or other standalone ecu. I don't even think you'll be able to get a Re-map to suit that sort of power level.

we'll see, stay on topic mate

well, looks like i will go for a standalone ecu:blitz, mines.

NFW am i buying a pfc. every man and his dog has one.

and yet, they are hell expensive.

easy to say buy one if ur not a uni student, and a casual employee. BE REALISTIC

i will look into a standalone ecu. any suggestions would be sweet.

ps still want to run safc

Edited by r33cruiser

anyway you have enough info to make an informed decision

if you have a local remapper guy and he is ok with doing injectors and afm go for it

it will be much better than the safc comprimise

we'll see, stay on topic mate

well, looks like i will go for a standalone ecu:blitz, mines.

NFW am i buying a pfc. every man and his dog has one.

and yet, they are hell expensive.

easy to say buy one if ur not a uni student, and a casual employee. BE REALISTIC

i will look into a standalone ecu. any suggestions would be sweet.

ps still want to run safc

ok you are set in your ways so i will stop caring and offering advice at this point

but dont buy a blitz or a mines ecu, they are pointless as there are no mines or blitz tuners in australia

so you may as well stick with the stock ecu and just be done with it.

get a locally supported ecu and get someone to tune it correctly

every man and his dog has a powerfc because they are the easiest, cheapest, quickest, well supported and best bang per buck ecu

sure motec is great but for 3 grand why would when you get the majority of the crap you need for 1k instead

if you are looking at a stand alone ecu look at;

apexi powerfc

greddy emanage (remap piggyback)

link ecu

wold 3d

autronic

motec

hks fcon

but as you will know none of those come cheap, as they are standalone systems

and if you do go for some exotic ecu find out how much for tune and how many workshops can support it

if only one workshop in aus supports it then whats the point, its gonna cost you 10 billion $ for a tune

we'll see, stay on topic mate

well, looks like i will go for a standalone ecu:blitz, mines.

NFW am i buying a pfc. every man and his dog has one.

and yet, they are hell expensive.

easy to say buy one if ur not a uni student, and a casual employee. BE REALISTIC

i will look into a standalone ecu. any suggestions would be sweet.

ps still want to run safc

every man and his dog has a pfc for a reason.

Your going on about 260rwkw's but then saying your a uni student and casual employee. It'll cost u money to make that power and u NEED a stand alone computer of some sort, its not a luxury in your case its a necessity.

haha, alright cheers man i do appreciate it.

i just installed a turbo, pump, reg, clutch, diff, safc, injectors, z32

and would like to get as much power out of that as possible

been told by chapmans i can make 260kw...

cheers guys, u can finally lay this one to rest

its always funny to see the old codgers get rilled up because they think that their way is the only way to make HP.

anyway guys see ya at a later date

Edited by r33cruiser

Paul is right, is a waste of time trying to help this guy. Buying an ECU to be "different" is the dumbest thing I have heard since trying to run a RB30 crank in a RB26 block. Let me guess, you painted your car a special colour to be different too?

Go on, tune your SAFC to run 260rwkw, I dare you. I bet you spend more money than a powerfc costs trying to get it to run properly.

f**k some people on this site make me laugh.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
×
×
  • Create New...