Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

The release date in Japan for the new GT-R has been confirmed for 24th October 2007.

For a track test video and techincal specs, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWNPyuuefbQ

The price will be 7.7 million Yen cost price at Nissan Dealers in Japan. It will take SEVS workshops some time to obtain approval to comply this model, but as a guide, the FOB price on a new GT-R would be approx. 8.2 million Yen once Japanese registration and deregistration (required by Japanese law prior to exporting new cars), plus taxes etc. are taken into account. This would equate to about $126,000 complied,

I want aswell....

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186561-sex-on-wheels/#findComment-3372281
Share on other sites

The release date in Japan for the new GT-R has been confirmed for 24th October 2007.

For a track test video and techincal specs, see: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DWNPyuuefbQ

The price will be 7.7 million Yen cost price at Nissan Dealers in Japan. It will take SEVS workshops some time to obtain approval to comply this model, but as a guide, the FOB price on a new GT-R would be approx. 8.2 million Yen once Japanese registration and deregistration (required by Japanese law prior to exporting new cars), plus taxes etc. are taken into account. This would equate to about $126,000 complied,

I want aswell....

Yeah thats from prestigemotorsport^^, I thought though that there was rumours that Nissan were selling the GTR as a locally delivered model? There are rumours that there are a few people who have ordered the car too - would this be through nissan or are they just giving a deposit to an importer or something?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186561-sex-on-wheels/#findComment-3372300
Share on other sites

It looks pretty tuff, but no RB26?...

Its a shame that it wont be a proper GTR.

I absolutely hate this kind of thinking (along with "the V35 isn't a proper Skyline").

The RB26 would in stock form would be too weak to achieve the things Nissan want to do with the new GTR.

And nothing shows progress like putting in an engine with a 20 year old design in a new car... :D

SEVS? I thought they were going to sell them here new.

Not confirmed yet.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186561-sex-on-wheels/#findComment-3372335
Share on other sites

Who said that the rb26 would be in the same form it was 18 years ago, its like anything with age you make improvements.

ive got nothing against this new beast. but i think it should go by a different name. the GTR finished production in 2002 for a good reason.

its like a tv series, if you make to many shows people loose interest, sure the first few years may be great, but then the writers struggle to come up with new ideas and it becomes boring.

at the end of the day all im saying is a great new car should have a great new name, and maybe in the years to come this could be looked at as another one of nissan's greats.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186561-sex-on-wheels/#findComment-3372440
Share on other sites

Who said that the rb26 would be in the same form it was 18 years ago, its like anything with age you make improvements.

ive got nothing against this new beast. but i think it should go by a different name. the GTR finished production in 2002 for a good reason.

its like a tv series, if you make to many shows people loose interest, sure the first few years may be great, but then the writers struggle to come up with new ideas and it becomes boring.

at the end of the day all im saying is a great new car should have a great new name, and maybe in the years to come this could be looked at as another one of nissan's greats.

Yes but this isn't a Skyline. it's a GTR

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186561-sex-on-wheels/#findComment-3372452
Share on other sites

well i think they will be selling much more then $126k this topic comes up so often. to be honest the new GTR wont be a hit for a while i think.

like i said in another thread im not bothering to think about it until it actually gets released. haha

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/186561-sex-on-wheels/#findComment-3372464
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yes I can see how that would put you off HFM, especially with the price of good quality brake fluid. From what I understand it as you say the BM50 is the standard BMC for a R32 GTR, I must admit I would like to go far a Genuine Nissan BM57, but lack of cash prevents that at present. With the price being so close between the genuine BM50 and BM57 a BM57 New it seems a better choice as you gain that 1/16 bore size with the BM57, I would be interested in how much difference you feel with the BM57 fitted. I am going to take SteveL's advice in the short term and see how much actually comes out of that proportioning valve vent and save up for the Genuine Nissan part. Thanks for clarifying the HFM failure
    • Thanks mate. I just got the post inspection 1/2 done from state roads when the starter motor packed up, either that or the car alarm system is having trouble.  OEM part number 23300-AA112.
    • Hi, I though I was coming to an end in finding a replacement starter motor for a rb25de neo. I came across a starter motor from Taarks and a message below stating: Direct fit. 11 Tooth count. All below part numbers have been superseded to 11 teeth. Can some body shed some light on going from 8 teeth to 11 teeth apart from 36-month / 25,000 km warranty for passenger vehicles to 12 Month Warranty. Compatible with the following Nissan part numbers: 23300-20P00 23300-20P01 23300-20P05 23300-20P10 23300-20P11 23300-AA111 23300-AA112 23300-AA300 23300-08U10 23300-08U11 23300-08U15  
    • Low battery? Maybe check capacity? I know first-hand, on BMWs if your battery drops below 80% capacity, it starts causing strange issues.
    • 8.5 +37 = should fit rear, but I think it'll hit on front. What you want is low 30s/high 20's front, mid 30's rear. That 17" screenshot you posted looks good, I'd run it on my R32 (but that's long dead now). For tyre sizes, my rule of thumb is: 8': 235, 9": 255. But that's just my opinion. Nismo sizes: 18x8.5+35/18x9.5+38 is a good starting point.
×
×
  • Create New...