Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

just back from the tuners its like a new car just got a gt3076r installed running 16psi on low boost setting and 21psi on high boost settings. any one tell me what this dyno sheet is telling me. looks like at the top end its letting go. could this be cams?

i have all the supporting mods.

cheers

post-32900-1191075049_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/187275-just-got-r33-from-tuners/
Share on other sites

PS, i have no idea how or why Cams would give you jumpy power like that.

I really doubt that's what it is, and the power level (250) isn't anything that Cams would have a problem with.

I guess what i'm saying is that Cams could handle 2000rwkws as long as the engine and turbo were up to it.

The only reason you would change Cams is to improve power gains across the rev range etc....

Nothing wrong with standard though if you're punching more air in.

Two distinct dips but not shaky looking graph line.

I'd suspect 1-2 degrees of timing taken out to address knock. A look at your ignition map will soon tell. :)

The over 4000rpm results looks good, but what do you think about things under that engine speed? Looks a bit lazy to come on for you. This spec should be generally similar to The Mafia, and he's pulling 300kW out of 18psi + a much more linear looking curve throughout the range with the assistance of water/meth.

Edited by Dale FZ1
I'd suspect 1-2 degrees of timing taken out to address knock. A look at your ignition map will soon tell. :P
whats your timing degrees tuned at? if you take out 1 - 2 degrees timing, you will get slightly better mid range power but less peak power..

Previous posts by Murat, and the comment about "all supporting mods" indicates he has a PFC.

I'm suggesting it's in the spark mapping ie adjusting one or two specific cells in the map, not the base timing being adjusted by a degree or two :)

Could be wrong but that's where I'd look if there is a concern/query about the shape of the graph

Edited by Dale FZ1
whats your timing degrees tuned at? if you take out 1 - 2 degrees timing, you will get slightly better mid range power but less peak power..

Explain to me how removing timing is going to improve his midrange???

Id really like to know!

It looks like the exhaust housing may be to small If its not retard to much in the topend.

What sort of timing is it running through the top?? and like others have suggested what exhaust housing are you using??

core number is 700382-5012

compressor housing is .60A/R

turbine housing is .82A/R internal wastegate

if that helps is there any one i can take the car too give me a hand with the problem?

money is no problem.

dude, thats the same turbo as me. (GT3037) I make 15psi by 3900rpm in second gear.

The bigger rear must give it a bit more lag hey?

Also, can you list your supporting mods?

I make just over 300rwkw at 18psi on this turbo.

dude, thats the same turbo as me. (GT3037) I make 15psi by 3900rpm in second gear.

The bigger rear must give it a bit more lag hey?

Also, can you list your supporting mods?

I make just over 300rwkw at 18psi on this turbo.

Engine management - PFC

Boost ran - 18psi

Turbo - Garrett GT3076r

Nismo 740cc injectors

Bosch 040 pump

Gready EBC Profec II

Z32 80mm Air Flow Meter

Hybrid Intercooler

3inch Exhaust turbo back

Splitfire Coil Packs

Stock Internals

no head work

Fuel pump

its not that bad i get about 15psi by 3800rpm its depends on the engine load at the time 5th gear its full boost by 3500

thats strange, as I have almost the same setup, but with a smaller turbo rear.

That wavey line looks dodgey. Are the AFR's staying safe while it is doing that? Is the fuel pump healthy? You'll need to test your pressures.

thats strange, as I have almost the same setup, but with a smaller turbo rear.

That wavey line looks dodgey. Are the AFR's staying safe while it is doing that? Is the fuel pump healthy? You'll need to test your pressures.

AFR are safe its is running rich because after about an hour of driving the back bumper has a light black color, fuel pump was installed about 3 months ago brand new, what i will check is the cat see if it is choking and do a pressure test, i know i should be getting abit more becuase i have read your 300kw advantage this is what i have built my car from. so im abit shocked.

anything else you reckon i can check out ?

i have notice one more thing with the car the idle is very high sits at about 900 to 1000 rpm, i tried to reset it to a lower figure but it still sits up at 900 to 1000 rpm could this be a connected problem?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...