Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

hey Cara,

should go 18x9 on the front as 18x8 will sit inside the guard heaps. :(

You mean 19x9?? He's right how come they come 19x8 front and 19x10 rear, such a big difference between the front and rear!! And also you should stretch some 235 or 245 on the rears in stead of 275!! All in all yes the wheels will be a nice look!!

You mean 19x9?? He's right how come they come 19x8 front and 19x10 rear, such a big difference between the front and rear!! And also you should stretch some 235 or 245 on the rears in stead of 275!! All in all yes the wheels will be a nice look!!

yeah my bad, relised after i wrote it.

even could go a lower offset to get more dish.

hahaha

nah i really want 275's on the back lol i just loove the fat tyre look hehehehe

not sure why they are 19x8 on the front and 19x 10 thats just the way they have done them i guess........ might go 245's on the front perhaps?

and i got a new job today!!!!!! yaay! start 2morro...........im a cook at Alaska Foods :(

Edited by MissR34
hahaha

nah i really want 275's on the back lol i just loove the fat tyre look hehehehe

not sure why they are 19x8 on the front and 19x 10 thats just the way they have done them i guess........ might go 245's on the front perhaps?

and i got a new job today!!!!!! yaay! start 2morro...........im a cook at Alaska Foods :(

Nah don't go 245s on the front, I have 8.5 front with 235 and there is no stretch what so ever, I'd be sticking with a 235 if i were you, or you might get inner guard or outer guard scrubbing!!

Edited by Deluxe
Darren will you be traveling to any of the VIC state series races this year??

Yeh well after talking with Brad in the Saloon Car we were hoping NOT to run the National Series and wanting to win the SA and VIC state Champs in the one year, so hopefully i'll be going for all rounds but not sure as yet. And as for Strat and the IP car, I think we were supposed to do the next Sandown meeting with the Boostworx boys, but our car is under going some 33 brake upgrades, so don't think we will make that one, but hoping to do a Sandown meeting and possibly a PI meeting!!

I'm assuming your going over for most??

Yeh well after talking with Brad in the Saloon Car we were hoping NOT to run the National Series and wanting to win the SA and VIC state Champs in the one year, so hopefully i'll be going for all rounds but not sure as yet. And as for Strat and the IP car, I think we were supposed to do the next Sandown meeting with the Boostworx boys, but our car is under going some 33 brake upgrades, so don't think we will make that one, but hoping to do a Sandown meeting and possibly a PI meeting!!

I'm assuming your going over for most??

Hopefully living there soon, got an interview this week end over there. I should be at all the Vic rounds with Intermarque. First round in March should have a full capacity grid

Hopefully living there soon, got an interview this week end over there. I should be at all the Vic rounds with Intermarque. First round in March should have a full capacity grid

Yeh thats the one i might be going over to, I'm in Sydney on the Wed-Fri beforehand, BUT Brad sold his AU to the VIC state champ for cash he couldn't refuse, and he baught his old EA off him before also, So were hoping to borrow the EA for shits and giggles and to get some points........ He still hasn't dropped off the AU so we might have to drive over Friday night after Syd!! All the Boostworx boys will be there i think, so keep your eye out for them and Tony and his 808 has the lap record there!!

Nice work on the interview and Good Luck!!

magnetic?

LOL, that would take some magnet LOL

The giveaway is the ring of bolts inside the rim (what could they be for if the wheel hasnt got a centre?)

The other hint is that the inside diameter is is smaller on the far side. The wheel looks magic from this ange but its easier to see whats happening if they show you the other side, its more like a giant bearing with a tyer on the outside.

how the hell does that bike work with no hub? im just stupid i guess and cant work it out :banana:

hit the link at the top of my post in the wasteland, there is a whole gallery in there.

here are a couple more pics of it

8677_180108125932_18.jpg

this one explains it :)

8677_180108125937_26.jpg

not sure how well it would stop tho

**not that u wanna be standing on the rear brakes too much :ermm:

Edited by bezender
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
    • God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
×
×
  • Create New...