Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I know there are lots and lots of threads about the turbotech boost controllers.. so I wont go into that side of things ( as you can read the reviews and make up your own mind )

But what I DID want to say is that I reckon its made a hell of a difference.

I installed the loaner boost guage ( thanks Jerome ) and basically got a feel of that boost it ran thru the rev range. I then followed the how-to for installing the manual boost controller ( I removed the restrictor pipe as well ) - not sure if removing the restrictor pipe made any difference... but it definately didnt hurt anything.

and the verdict?

I reckon the car builds boost faster and definately feels more responsive. I honestly cant tell you how many rpm earlier it gets on boost but the SOTP Dyno tells me there is an improvement.

so yeah.. for the $29 for the turbotech boost controller and maybe 1/2 a days work - I would definately ( strongly even ! ) suggest that Stagea owners give it a try. I was pleased with the results!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/188507-new-boost-controller/
Share on other sites

I've got the turbotech boost controller as well. The tuners at Unique Autosports aren't fans of them, but you can't argue with the dyno graph and it holds 10psi all day :rolleyes:

definitely allows quicker boost response and hold thoughout the entire rev range.

VERY tricky to adjust though, a small turn equals 2-3psi so be careful !!

1/2 a day's work? you mean 10-20 mins work :rolleyes: (maybe longer if you're trying to reach a certain boost level - having to stop and adjust it manually in small increments until you're happy).

Anyway, I have one of these and I too think they are awesome! I previously had a JRD sport one from ebay which is apparently the same type of controller. But when i put the turbotech one on it felt heaps more responsive and seemed to build boost noticeably faster.

The JRD one couldn't hold the boost in the upper rev range (losing as much as 3psi by the redline) whereas the turbotech holds boost very constant.

I'd definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a cheap but reliable boost controller. :P

yeah.. but what would be interesting to see is:

how well the factory controler ( solenoid I think ) holds boost

what RPM does it start to build full boost.

you might find that the turbotech one comes on harder and faster than factory

that is certainly my take on it. thats what my ass-dyno tells me.

and I dont know if removing that restrictor did anything either..

im using factory boost controller and holding at 1 bar which is = 14psi

well took me a bit longer cause I wanted to " baseline " what boost the stagea was already running ( as it was 100% stock we didnt have a boost guage in there , so yeah just seeing what PSI on what revs etc!

I got it down to under a minute to get out of the car - pop the bonnet - adjust controller

close bonnet and get back in car. Needless to say I had to do it a few times

1/2 a day's work? you mean 10-20 mins work :thumbsup: (maybe longer if you're trying to reach a certain boost level - having to stop and adjust it manually in small increments until you're happy).

Anyway, I have one of these and I too think they are awesome! I previously had a JRD sport one from ebay which is apparently the same type of controller. But when i put the turbotech one on it felt heaps more responsive and seemed to build boost noticeably faster.

The JRD one couldn't hold the boost in the upper rev range (losing as much as 3psi by the redline) whereas the turbotech holds boost very constant.

I'd definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a cheap but reliable boost controller. :)

yeah.. but what would be interesting to see is:

how well the factory controler ( solenoid I think ) holds boost

what RPM does it start to build full boost.

you might find that the turbotech one comes on harder and faster than factory

that is certainly my take on it. thats what my ass-dyno tells me.

and I dont know if removing that restrictor did anything either..

Answers to your questions:

1. Its hold boost perfectly.

post-27949-1191903164_thumb.jpg

umm .. doenst actually show boost pressure on that graph

I mean you can get an IDEA thru the power curve - but cant really see if boost is dropping off

I mean I an not doubting what your telling me .. and all this is really subjective you know?

I mean I got no proof that it spools quicker. Just my perception

Answers to your questions:

1. Its hold boost perfectly.

Same here, after doing the solenoid mod, i whacked one of this babies on and WHOA... very nice indeed. Definitely builds boost a lot quicker, and holds it very nicely at 10psi.

One thing i had to do after a few of adjustments and realised that my boost wasn't going anywhere, sometimes the ball bearing gets stuck and you need to undo the whole thing and drop it back in. Just don't lose it!

edit: Very easy to "hide" under the sock box too.

Edited by webng

if you ever loose your ball ( note I didnt say BALLS ! ) I got a spare one kicking around somewhere,.

yeah had this boost T in my pulsar ( solid engine mounts so rattled like a mofo ) and yea the nut that secures the big arse alan bolt was loose and the whole lot just rattled apart!

so its important to really get that nut nice and tight

Same here, after doing the solenoid mod, i whacked one of this babies on and WHOA... very nice indeed. Definitely builds boost a lot quicker, and holds it very nicely at 10psi.

One thing i had to do after a few of adjustments and realised that my boost wasn't going anywhere, sometimes the ball bearing gets stuck and you need to undo the whole thing and drop it back in. Just don't lose it!

edit: Very easy to "hide" under the sock box too.

Answers to your questions:

1. Its hold boost perfectly.

fairly aggressive afr's

it should be nice and responsive but is there any discernible knock?

we found the turbotech a handful once you wound the boost over 14psi, tiny changes to the screw position brought large changes to boost. it was borderline dangerous at higher levels in our case.

under this level it wasn't an issue and great value at the price.

Edited by wolverine

Yeh had the turbotech for about 6 weeks now. I was astonished at the difference, esp. mid-range boost. It's like Nissan blocked 75% of the turbo's power with the stock solenoid, and the tee just unleashes it all.

At 11psi and 6000rpm the RB25 just howls like a mofo. It's excellent for the price.

I'd recommend it to anyone as a first mod.

actually i didt bring this up before.

When i got the rig tuned. I brought all the parts to Ben. Parts includes Power Fc, boost Apexi boost cpntroller to match the Power Fcadjustable cams. I dropped it off and Guess what. Ben gave me back the boost controller and said that he didnt need the boost controller. he said at the power im tuning for factory boost controller is fine. It will hold boost. An i thought he was joking.

After i got the car the turbos start boosting at about 2250 and full boost at about 4500rpm from memory.

No pinging. And now im running on Boost 98 for my fiel. And Ben said that he prefers to use mobil 98, Bp Ultimate and Boost 98.

So... i freaking wasted about A$400 for nothing. Cos my boost controller is sitting in my office collecting dust at the moment!!

yudy has a rb26 remember so things are different compared to the 25 soleniod etc. Also i agree that those AFR's are right on the limit and i would never risk running 12.5:1 on a daily basis without constant checks of the tune. 11.8-12.0:1 is the leanest i would personally go for a safety margin if u get a bad batch of fuel etc.

just my 2c worth (i know racepace are great but i would of told them to richen it up abit more for safety)

I installed one of these to my stagea the other week as well

Brings the car alive, however i find my self running around 8psi now as it stutters at around 4-5k rpm if i have it any higher, hopefully once i get the safc2 in and tuned it will be sorted

the rig is running rich. how i know?! i swapped my rear muffler to a kakimoto. And a couple of tanks later the exit pipe was black already. So i guess the car is running rich. And i ran with boost 98 with that 2 tanks.

I filled up with bp 95 the other day cos i ran out of fuel and they only sell 95 octane in the country side. I took it easy on the gas pedal and it ran dine. Im guessing that the engine was running rich which i dont really want. Cos thats wasting fuel and by running rich you actually lose power.

ohh i almost forgot my rig is an RB26 and yes Ben tweaked the boost controller. From memory thats the maximum that the factory boost controller can do. But yea if i want more pwoer im gonna to have to install the Apexi boost controller.

you sure thats not coilpacks breaking down ?

before you go to the expense of getting a SAFC - try gapping the plugs down a bit

that might help the spark stay put under boost.

I installed one of these to my stagea the other week as well

Brings the car alive, however i find my self running around 8psi now as it stutters at around 4-5k rpm if i have it any higher, hopefully once i get the safc2 in and tuned it will be sorted

if you do change boost controllers - and only want one boost setting -try the $30 turbotech one.

I think you might be surprised as to how well it responds. Well seeing as I have never experienced the boost buildup in the 26 I am not really one to comment I suppose.

Running rich is obviously safer for your motor- so I guess personally I would prefer to sacrifice a bit of power / fuel econ to have a bit more protection for the motor.

the rig is running rich. how i know?! i swapped my rear muffler to a kakimoto. And a couple of tanks later the exit pipe was black already. So i guess the car is running rich. And i ran with boost 98 with that 2 tanks.

I filled up with bp 95 the other day cos i ran out of fuel and they only sell 95 octane in the country side. I took it easy on the gas pedal and it ran dine. Im guessing that the engine was running rich which i dont really want. Cos thats wasting fuel and by running rich you actually lose power.

ohh i almost forgot my rig is an RB26 and yes Ben tweaked the boost controller. From memory thats the maximum that the factory boost controller can do. But yea if i want more pwoer im gonna to have to install the Apexi boost controller.

Edited by ssshonky

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...