Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 59
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Howard's a lying smug fu(ktard, Rudd will be a lying smug fu(ktard.

Yeah the ecconomy might go to shit with Rudd but at what cost does it do well with Howard. Can't afford a house, inflation it at it highest ever....and tax cuts, what a fu(ken laugh, we get tax cuts, then people spend more, we are no better off. It's one big fu(ken scam.

DONKEH for the win!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3425946
Share on other sites

I think i'll vote Rudd at this stage for a few reasons;

1. Educatuion policy, I think university should be free, howard has made the system user pays and hence O/S students are buying our uni places.

2. Howard is a liar, plain and simple.

3. Howards IR laws disadvantage those who can least afford it, people who depend on penalty rates, loadings ect.

4. Rudd is addressing climate change, Howard wont even ratify Kyoto!

Thats said I am not 100% behind Rudd, I will continue to watch the campaign closely.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3426096
Share on other sites

Howard.

We can't ratify Kyoto without severely disadvantaging ourselves in the global economy against higher polluters.

Ratifying Kyoto is simply a political point, and I completely agree with Howard's attitude to this.

If you've ever been in a business where idiots who do nothing, constantly mess up and basically fleece the employer because its so difficult to sack them you will be all for IR reforms.

BASS OUT

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3426122
Share on other sites

I think i'll vote Rudd at this stage for a few reasons;

1. Educatuion policy, I think university should be free, howard has made the system user pays and hence O/S students are buying our uni places.

2. Howard is a liar, plain and simple.

3. Howards IR laws disadvantage those who can least afford it, people who depend on penalty rates, loadings ect.

4. Rudd is addressing climate change, Howard wont even ratify Kyoto!

Thats said I am not 100% behind Rudd, I will continue to watch the campaign closely.

Hmm, interesting.

1. The Hawke/Keating government introduced the HECS (Higher Education Contribution Scheme) which means if you go to uni you pay the tax man. Plain & simple. O/S (full fee paying) student have been at our unis for many, many years. Good on them. Why should they be denied an education as well?

2. All politicians are liars. Plain & simple. Actually they are not. If you (or anyone else) had everything they ever said scrutinised & debated & misrepresented then you too (& me & everyone else) would be termed a liar. Rudd has the advantage of not having been around long enough to have piled up baggage.

3. Howard fkd up on the first change when they introduced the AWA's. But now that they have implemented a no disadvantage test covering the most important benifits you can't get little of no compensation for trading your penalty rates etc. Try working on a salary - you don't get any O/T, penalty rates or anything other than your salary. Not everyone works on wages or can even get access to AWA's.

4. Kyoto is a lame duck. Ratifying it will make bugger all difference. If Rudd had any bollocks he wouldn't be banging on about a target in 2050 - thats what four changes of government & 15 elections away. He would map out a short term target (say every year until 2020) & set out how he would achieve it. So would Howard. But they are both too gutless.

To finish: what I hate the most about this election is the me too, cloning that is going on in the policy areas. Weak as piss.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3426134
Share on other sites

I think i'll vote Rudd at this stage for a few reasons;

1. Educatuion policy, I think university should be free, howard has made the system user pays and hence O/S students are buying our uni places.

2. Howard is a liar, plain and simple.

3. Howards IR laws disadvantage those who can least afford it, people who depend on penalty rates, loadings ect.

4. Rudd is addressing climate change, Howard wont even ratify Kyoto!

Thats said I am not 100% behind Rudd, I will continue to watch the campaign closely.

Wait, Labor is going to make uni spots free and stop international students? Where'd they say that and as if that makes any sense.

Rudd's not a liar though, hard to lie when you never answer a question.

You CANNOT be stripped of penalty rates, loading etc without compensation.

Rudd hasn't addressed anything, he's crapped on about studies that they commisioned that won't tell him anything until it will mean very little to this election. All he has done is made promises about carbon emissions when he'll most likely be dead.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/190184-howard-vs-rudd/#findComment-3426151
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...