Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My mum has been busting my balls lately cause i told her about me just purchasing a hks super dragger exhuast with 2.5inch piping but its 2nd hand

she keeps nagging me to get her friend who owns a custom exhaust centre to make me one at pretty much nothing.....if i went with the custom made exhaust will i still get the increase in power made compared to a hks super dragger???? i dont think i would..so im better off with the hks yea???

bollocks. get the custom made one. if the guys making the exhaust have half a clue they should be able to craft one that gives you enough flow but still keeps the noise down.

i have no idea - i have heard that they are the shiz-nit

but others say not

i say go custom, cause the guys there have built it, and know whats in it, and if anything breaks or goes funny, they no what to fix.....

Isnt the HKS 3"? Cos then its too big..

Either way its better to go custom..

See if you can go balls out and get it made out of titanium!!!

If its possible.. I'd say screw HKS, get it custom, 2.5" titanium..

..yum yum..

haha cris

titanium = big big big bickies

the superdragger comes in 2.5, 3, 3.5 and i think even 4 inches daimeter...

Fully aware of this..

but..

she keeps nagging me to get her friend who owns a custom exhaust centre to make me one at pretty much nothing.....

:P

Even if it ends up costing the same price as a normal zorst.. or a little more.. your getting the same performance, saving ~20kg for a full zorst.. and the the *BLING* *BLING* factor

yea true how i know whats in it how it been built and guys will know how to fix if anything goes wrong

but only problem i have is finding a cannon muffler...i dont want a droaning xforce muffler i would love a apexi n1 to go on the end but yeah hard to come by with 2.5 inlet :P

if i can find a good muffler loud but not too droaning then ill go custom all the way.

actually cara it would be interesting to see a b4 and after dyno graph if you changed from the 3 inch to a 2.5 inch

one would imagine the mid range would beef up a bit and the top end would drop a fraction

3" is a bit big for an N/A i reckon... you won't get enough back pressure.... it'll kill your low end torque. comparing kw's before and after is pretty stupid when it comes to an exhaust, especially on an N/A. you need to focus more on the power delivery thru the rev range before and after. a good exhaust will boost your torque and power throughout the rev range, not just peak power.

one would imagine the mid range would beef up a bit and the top end would drop a fraction

not to mention low to mid would be ALOT more responsive.

Im with funkymonkey..

NA engines are about responce..

I laught when people say "I want 300KW"..

Focus your NA on responce and trorque with a beefy power band..

2.5" is good for an NA..

3" is a bit big for an N/A i reckon... you won't get enough back pressure volumetric vacuum/flow.... it'll kill your low end torque. comparing kw's before and after is pretty stupid when it comes to an exhaust, especially on an N/A. you need to focus more on the power delivery thru the rev range before and after. a good exhaust will boost your torque and power throughout the rev range, not just peak power.

exactly...

but for cara's purposes on the dyno, 3" is good i suppose.

my stance on custom vs. off the shelf (jap spec), will always lean towards the off the shelf item. NA RB's are notorious for their characteristic twin cam metalic ring, and it can be a headache to deal with if not done right.

i've never seen custom exhaust items as a positive, more as a negative - hks/fujitsubo, etc. don't invest big dollars into providing an item that has withstood the test of time as a bad product. things like tuned length, dB, emissions (fujitsubo legalis r?), flow, etc. are all factors that time has proven. i would very much prefer a proven product than one put together by the local guy who normally puts together 8 pots.

however if other factors such as cash is involved, then by all means prioritize your criteria accordingly.

back when I had an R32 GTS I had a fujitsubo legalis R exhaust and a legalis super Ex extractor system. was 2.5" and it droned like a bitch... plus the full stainless system added this tinny noise that made the car sound wierd when it revved.

ended up ditching the legalis R (sold it for a mint too to some brand name hugging buyer on ebay) and getting Tuffy's mufflers in sydney to make me up a custom exhaust. Again done in stainless steel, but this time with a proper resonator to get rid of that metallic noise from the exhaust, and cut down the drone. Still got a little metallic noise from the extractors, but it wasn't that bad. Since they were both 2.5" I didn't really see any change in performance or response, but the change in noise was amazing.

the problem with the fujitsubo, and I suspect with other japanese off the shelf items is that they are designed for turbo AND non turbo applications, not designed for use with an australian cat converter and don't have to meet the same noise emissions as we do. Getting a custom one made up will sort that all out for you.

the extractors and the exhaust:

m_superR.gif

m_superex.gif

i got a custom in mine, everyone said 2.25" and the exhaust guy so i got 2.25.. now everyones saying 2.5?

heres wat it sounds like with a magnaflow muffler and resonator :

http://youtube.com/watch?v=uRDVFAh0F24

hey leigh niceeee sound you have there

want someyhing similar bit more roary though but probably have the right sound with 2.5

ill have my mind made up once i speak to my mums friend the exhaust guy..

anyone heard of his company...called Pro X or something??

i got a custom in mine, everyone said 2.25" and the exhaust guy so i got 2.25.. now everyones saying 2.5?

Yeah people were telling me to get a 2.25" for any real benefits for N/A engines. 2.5" I guess is acceptable but probably would be better on cars with small turbos/ lower boost. 3" for bigger turbos and higher boost. I think anything larger than 2.5" on an N/A would = higher than 90db defect.

I could be wrong though.

i got a custom in mine, everyone said 2.25" and the exhaust guy so i got 2.25.. now everyones saying 2.5?
Yeah people were telling me to get a 2.25" for any real benefits for N/A engines. 2.5" I guess is acceptable

...

I think anything larger than 2.5" on an N/A would = higher than 90db defect.

I could be wrong though.

it's a compromise on an NA.

2.25 is what i would recommend for a car that's being driven around town, to the shops, to uni, work, etc.

however if you regularly see high rpm applications, i.e. track work - then 2.50" would be the ideal choice.

it's quite dependent on your application, none of this dyno rubbish in regards to kilowatts. everyone knows that a dyno reads maximum power at whatever rpm (more often than not, high rpm/near redline)

by choosing the correct exhaust diameter you are effectively putting your 'power/response/gigawatt/driveability' band in the range where you most frequently use it. there's no point in having a 11ty" exhaust, when you're only using 2000 - 4000 rpm daily,

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
    • Hi,  Just joined the forum so I could share my "fix" of this problem. Might be of use to someone. Had the same hunting at idle issue on my V36 with VQ35HR engine after swapping the engine because the original one got overheated.  While changing the engine I made the mistake of cleaning the throttle bodies and tried all the tricks i could find to do a throttle relearn with no luck. Gave in and took it to a shop and they couldn't sort it. Then took it to my local Nissan dealership and they couldn't get it to idle properly. They said I'd need to replace the throttle bodies and the ecu probably costing more than the car is worth. So I had the idea of replacing the carbon I cleaned out with a thin layer of super glue and it's back to normal idle now. Bit rough but saved the car from the wreckers 🤣
    • After my last update, I went ahead with cleaning and restoring the entire fuel system. This included removing the tank and cleaning it with the Beyond Balistics solution, power washing it multiple times, drying it thoroughly, rinsing with IPA, drying again with heat gun and compressed air. Also, cleaning out the lines, fuel rail, and replacing the fuel pump with an OEM-style one. During the cleaning process, I replaced several hoses - including the breather hose on the fuel tank, which turned out to be the cause of the earlier fuel leak. This is what the old fuel filter looked like: Fuel tank before cleaning: Dirty Fuel Tank.mp4   Fuel tank after cleaning (some staining remains): Clean Fuel Tank.mp4 Both the OEM 270cc and new DeatschWerks 550cc injectors were cleaned professionally by a shop. Before reassembling everything, I tested the fuel flow by running the pump output into a container at the fuel filter location - flow looked good. I then fitted the new fuel filter and reassembled the rest of the system. Fuel Flow Test.mp4 Test 1 - 550cc injectors Ran the new fuel pump with its supplied diagonal strainer (different from OEM’s flat strainer) and my 550cc injectors using the same resized-injector map I had successfully used before. At first, it idled roughly and stalled when I applied throttle. Checked the spark plugs and found that they were fouled with carbon (likely from the earlier overly rich running when the injectors were clogged). After cleaning the plugs, the car started fine. However, it would only idle for 30–60 seconds before stalling, and while driving it would feel like a “fuel cut” after a few seconds - though it wouldn’t fully stall. Test 2 – Strainer swap Suspecting the diagonal strainer might not be reaching the tank bottom, I swapped it for the original flat strainer and filled the tank with ~45L of fuel. The issue persisted exactly the same. Test 3 – OEM injectors To eliminate tuning variables, I reinstalled the OEM 270cc injectors and reverted to the original map. Cleaned the spark plugs again just in-case. The stalling and “fuel cut” still remained.   At this stage, I suspect an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, caused during the cleaning process. This has led me to look into getting Frenchy’s fuel hanger and replacing the unit entirely. TL;DR: Cleaned and restored the fuel system (tank, lines, rail, pump). Tested 550cc injectors with the same resized-injector map as before, but the car stalls at idle and experiences what feels like “fuel cut” after a few seconds of driving. Swapped back to OEM injectors with original map to rule out tuning, but the issue persists. Now suspecting an intermittent power or connection fault at the fuel pump hanger, possibly cause by the cleaning process.  
×
×
  • Create New...