Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

The only thing That would come ANYWHERE NEAR the VR is a Z-tune..

Even then, it would still get is arse handed to it..

or.. would it?

Yes the GTR has titanium this.. bollocks that.. electronic jizz control..

But the Z-tune is still pretty hardcore!..

I mean Nimso poured 5mm of Carbon fiber on the floor plan to stiffen it it..

it uses a the GT500 race engine..

Carbon fiber pannels all round..

10.04 or something like that quarter mile..

Same power.. not sure about torque..

I think the Z-tune is ligher..

The gear changes wont be as quick in the Z-tune as in the GTR.. but.. could a Z-tune make up for this?

hmm.. discuss.. im curious..

Edited by GTS4WD
I am almost sure, I think perhaps if the work to upgrade the engine RB26DETT much better than the engine VR38DETT! !

Because LINE ENGINE IS BETTER FROM V ENGINE !!!!!!!!!

In what way?? Have you seen someone modify the VR38 yet??

And what makes you say an inline motor is better than a V engine??

A 'V' engine is much stronger and stiffer than an inline engine...

Can you back up your comments with facts???

It be appreciated muchly from you.... :thumbsup:

In what way?? Have you seen someone modify the VR38 yet??

And what makes you say an inline motor is better than a V engine??

A 'V' engine is much stronger and stiffer than an inline engine...

Can you back up your comments with facts???

It be appreciated muchly from you.... :yes:

The unfortunately reality is that the inline 6 has probably had its day. The packaging benefits of the V6 makes them a better proposition for the run of the mill car companies - particularly those running transverse installations. Even in longitudinal ones the gains are there in making the car easier to engineer for crash worthiness.

But to defend the old inline six (Which I have a soft spot for) they have the following advantages over their bent up brethren:

* Inherent first and second order balance - the V6's either run funny vee angles or need an extra balance shaft.

* Easier packaging when you turbo charge the motor.

* More room on the axhaust side which allows better cooling for the turbo chargers etc.

* Cheaper head castings as you only need two cam shafts & on head.

* They sound much nicer.

how easy would it be to take out the TT setup and throw in a, lets say T51R SPL onto an engine like that (VR)? Maybe compare it to a 300zx engine...I have never had experience with that...is there enough space...how does it all compare to throwing a t51r on a 26 ?

In what way?? Have you seen someone modify the VR38 yet??

And what makes you say an inline motor is better than a V engine??

A 'V' engine is much stronger and stiffer than an inline engine...

Can you back up your comments with facts???

It be appreciated muchly from you.... :(

================================================================

I have no experience with the engine VR38DETT to you that expectation proved largely true! !

Despite the dramatic difference in STROKER! !

But in terms of the experience of the RB20DET and RB25DET and RB26DETT is better in all respects use or promotion or maintenance or endurance is much better too! ! !

There is no engine V6 6 Slander advantage proved successful only relatively Tourqu be a little better and I say this advantage! ! !

But respects mentioned above inline much better health and days will prove myself! ! Despite the size difference stroker !!!!!!!

NOTE: inline engine only for the 6 slander !! V ENGINE GOOD ON THE V8 ONLY !! OR MORE!!!

Thanks ALL .[/b][/size] :yes:

Edited by bkc
The only thing That would come ANYWHERE NEAR the VR is a Z-tune..

Even then, it would still get is arse handed to it..

or.. would it?

Yes the GTR has titanium this.. bollocks that..

But the Z-tune is still pretty hardcore!.. I mean Nimso poured 5mm of Carbon fiber on the floor plan to stiffen it it.. it uses a the 500 race engine.. Carbon fiber pannels all round.. 10.04 or something like that quarter mile..

Same power.. not sure about torque.. I think the Z-tune is ligher..

The gear changes wont be as quick in the Z-tune as in the GTR.. but.. could a Z-tune make up for this?

hmm.. discuss.. im curious..

What race engine are you referring to?

If it's the GT500 from SuperGT, then your probably wrong, cause they have been using a V engine in these for many years in the 350Z and a few seasons in the R34's before that.

If it's the GT500 engine from way back when the R34's first came out( In JGTC), then that's a pretty old engine, and I'd still take the VR over it any day.

The only thing That would come ANYWHERE NEAR the VR is a Z-tune..

Even then, it would still get is arse handed to it..

or.. would it?

Yes the GTR has titanium this.. bollocks that..

But the Z-tune is still pretty hardcore!.. I mean Nimso poured 5mm of Carbon fiber on the floor plan to stiffen it it.. it uses a the 500 race engine.. Carbon fiber pannels all round.. 10.04 or something like that quarter mile..

Same power.. not sure about torque.. I think the Z-tune is ligher..

The gear changes wont be as quick in the Z-tune as in the GTR.. but.. could a Z-tune make up for this?

hmm.. discuss.. im curious..

the z-tune costs a lot more and will be a collectors item. The R35 will be mass produced. If I was to chose b/w to two, Id go the z-tune.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Even more fun, leave all the ADAS stuff plugged in, but in different locations, hopefully avoid any codes!   And honestly, all these new cars with their weird electronics. Pull all the electronics out Duncan, and just shove an aftermarket ECU and if needed a trans controller in, along with a PDM. Make it run basic but race car styled!
    • To follow up a question from earlier too since I had the front bar off again (fking!) This is what is between the bumper and the drivers side wheel And this is the navigator side, only one thing but its a biggy! So basically....no putting coolers in the wheel arches without a lot of moving other stuff. Assuming I move to properly race prepping this car I'll take that job on and see how the computers respond to removing a whole bunch of ADAS modules
    • So I prepped the car for another track day on Wednesday (will be interesting to see coolant temps post flushing out and the larger reservoir, with a forecast of 3-14 being 20o cooler than last time I took it out). Couple of things to mention; since I am just driving the car and not taking a support vehicle, I took the rear seats out and just loaded the back up Team Trackday style. Look at all that space! To cover off removing the rear seat....it is weird (note the hybrid is probably different because it wouldn't have folding rear seats) Basically, you remove the lower seat base, very similar to a r series but it is a clip that pulls forward to release the base rather than it being bolted down. Easy Then, you need to remove the side section of the rear seat on each side. There is a 14mm head nut at the bottom of the side piece, the it slides upwards off a hook at the top to release; you also need to unhook the seatbelt from the loop at the top. Then the centre piece is weird. You need to release/fold the seats forward with the tab in the boot on each side From there, there are 2,x12mm headed bolts holding the rear of each seat to the folding bracket, under the trim between the rear seat and the boot (4x christmas tree clips there, they suck). The seat is out but you can see where the bolts attach to the bracket
    • As discussed in the previous post, the bushes in the 110 needed replacing. I took this opportunity to replace the castor bushes, the front lower control arm, lower the car and get the alignment dialled in with new tyres. I took it down to Alignment Motorsports on the GC to get this work done and also get more out of the Shockworks as I felt like I wasn't getting the full use out of them.  To cut a very long story short, it ended up being the case the passenger side castor arm wouldn't accept the brand new bush as the sleeve had worn badly enough to the point you could push the new bush in by hand and completely through. Trying a pair of TRD bushes didn't fix the issue either (I had originally gone with Hardrace bushes). We needed to urgently source another castor arm, and thankfully this was sourced and the guys at the shop worked on my car until 7pm on a Saturday to get everything done. The car rides a lot nicer now with the suspension dialled in properly. Lowered the car a little as well to suit the lower profile front tyres, and just bring the car down generally. Eternally thankful for the guys down at the shop to get the car sorted, we both pulled big favours from our contacts to get it done on the Saturday.  Also plugged in the new Stedi foglights into the S15, and even from a quick test in the garage I'm keen to see how they look out on the road. I had some concerns about the length of the LED body and whether it'd fit in the foglight housing but it's fine.  I've got a small window coming up next month where I'll likely get a little paint work done on the 110 to remove the rear wing, add a boot wing and roof wing, get the side skirt fixed up and colour match the little panel on the tail lights so that I can install some badges that I've kept in storage. I'm also tempted to put in a new pair of headlights on the 110.  Until then, here's some more pictures from Easter this year. 
    • I would put a fuel pressure gauge between the filter and the fuel rail, see if it's maintaining good fuel pressure at idle going up to the point when it stalls. Do you see any strange behavior in commanded fuel leading up to the point when it stalls? You might have to start going through the service manual and doing a long list of sensor tests if it's not the fuel system for whatever reason.
×
×
  • Create New...