Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I have no experience with the engine VR38DETT to you that expectation proved largely true! !

Despite the dramatic difference in STROKER! !

But in terms of the experience of the RB20DET and RB25DET and RB26DETT is better in all respects use or promotion or maintenance or endurance is much better too! ! !

There is no engine V6 6 Slander advantage proved successful only relatively Tourqu be a little better and I say this advantage! ! !

But respects mentioned above inline much better health and days will prove myself! ! Despite the size difference stroker !!!!!!!

NOTE: inline engine only for the 6 slander !! V ENGINE GOOD ON THE V8 ONLY !! OR MORE!!!

Dude, you made my head hurt with that :thumbsup: ... stop using google translation to translate from whatever language you first typed that in.

  • Replies 266
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Nope.. clearly remeber it running somwhere in the 10's

close, found this on the web,

- The Z-tune ran 0-400 meters (a little shorter than a quarter mile) in 10.06 seconds during development.

- NISMO claims a Z-Tune will crush through a quarter-mile in just 10.6 seconds on street tires. That would make it the hardest

accelerating "production" car ever.

whoa bkc :whistling: .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

whoa bkc :D .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

Well said

whoa bkc >_< .... thought id start posting and here would be a good place to start. i am with 90% of the others on here. rb26 is a good motor but its like 20yrs old now. iron block too. not too mention the lack of varible valve. sure modders hate it but it is actully a good thing if u can figure it out...and we all no of the rb26s oil problem. now the vr38 is a brand new motor, all alloy, titianum, alloy and magnesium parts = way superior.

and everyone is up in arms bout the manifold and the turbos being 1 peice, harden up girlscouts. everyone replced mainfolds anyway. the gtr's bay is probly wide enough that turbo replacing can be done from underneath rather then removing the motor 300zx style....not to mention tht intake manifold, pure sex

and the argument of sound? well the rb does sound nice, but the sound a well piped v6 can make is enough to make ur pants tighter.

finally, its a supercar, stop hating and start admiring, can you and will you ever be able to afford one? if so buy it and then tell us how bad it is and then give it to me coz i wont complain

/rant

Thank you for your reply .

General information is correct FOR RB26DETT !

EXAMPLE : GTR34 Z TUNE !! BETTER THAN NEW GTR35 ENGINE !! 2.8DETT !! I

THINK SAME TWIN TURBO iHi !! I am not sure from the twin turbo same it or not !!

!(((the less time best)))! :yes: (( 0-100km)) etc . !!!!

Thanks ALL .

Edited by bkc
Thank you for your reply .

General information is correct FOR RB26DETT !

EXAMPLE : GTR34 Z TUNE !! BETTER THAN NEW GTR35 ENGINE !! 2.8DETT !! I

THINK SAME TWIN TURBO iHi !! I am not sure from the twin turbo same it or not !!

!(((the less time best)))! :P (( 0-100km)) etc . !!!!

Thanks ALL .

Your a fking idiout, someone ban this guy or atleast close the thread.

You should have to have some understanding of the english language before posting

just out of curiousity, would what a z-tune cost? now compare that to the new gtr. also take into consideration that if the z-tune is running a race engine then it isn't going to take that kindly to sitting in traffic and driving down to the shops on a cold morning to get some milk. the vr38 is a high performance engine that can be used in everyday situations. also they r35 probably rides better on rough roads than the z-tune. and finally, as far as life of the engine goes, i'd say that the z-tunes motor would wear out quicker than the vr38. yes it has race internals, but they generally aren't designed to still be putting out full power after 100,000kms.

and i thought the vr38 had been developed with the help of cosworth.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...