Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

A few interesting comments. To those who don't like what I've said, sorry if I offended you. The only reason I pointed it out is because I find it interesting and wanted to see others point of view. As I said before, I don't think the nissan engineers have missed this. I'm sure they have done plenty of R&D and have the whole thing under control. I was just thinking similar to what warps and sh@un are saying. Just think its an interesting setup and worth talking about. :yes:

... and for all of those who think I'm trying to find a weakness lol. Don't stress. I was looking at all the pics cause I think this car is awesome. Just spotted this pic and it got me thinking :(

  • Replies 45
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Been looking through as many photos and specs as possible. Can't wait to see this beast. When I saw, this photo, however, it got me a bit concerned.

As you can see the gearbox is located at the back, which is great for weight distribution. The concern I have is the shaft that travels from the engine to the gearbox. This shaft will be spinning up to 7-7.5k rpm. For a shaft of this length to be spinning at that speed, it would need to be perfectly balanced. This is very difficult to achieve. That is why formula one have gone to V8's. Because the shorter shaft is easier to balance at those high speeds. If the gearbox was in the front, it wouldn't be a problem as the shaft would be spinning a lot slower due to being geared down. This is how most rear wheel drives operate.

What do you guys think?

http://press.nissan-global.com/PRESSKIT/NI...LISH/index.html

Roll down to "2-3. Reduced powertrain vibration"

Stop giving the OP a hard time. He's thinking about this stuff and has the balls to post up the question which started the discussion. Which is what forums are for :happy:

I'm sure that if a friend asked you a question like this you wouldn't take the piss out of him, you'd just explain that it's not how it works ;)

I thought the GTR was going to be running an auto only. Hence all the comments on clutch dumps, and the syncros "breaking" etc, are a bit useless... Correct if wrong.

And the only real issue with the GTR is the damn asking price!

No, it's running a DSG box.. dual clutch flappy paddle box.

haha i dont count flappy paddle box as manual

if it doesnt have a physical clutch petal that i can stomp on then its not manual imo, i hate when manufactures say semi-manual ITS AUTO lol

Edited by R34GTFOUR
haha i dont count flappy paddle box as manual

if it doesnt have a physical clutch petal that i can stomp on then its not manual imo, i hate when manufactures say semi-manual ITS AUTO lol

i'm sure shcumaker chucked a hissy fit too when ferrari told him he had to use flappy paddles on his "auto" F1 car. harden the f**k up.

i wonder what % of people whining about the lack of a clutch pedal in the new GT-R would actually be able to afford a new one?

hmmm....

maybe Nissan could make a cheaper manual version to appease all the 3rd or 4th owners :(

  • 2 weeks later...
flappy paddle box.

haha thanks clarkson

yeah suprised the porsche comment just came up. the 924 started in the 70's didn't it and it had the rear mounted box and surely considering it was a bit of a unexpected change for porsche to be running FR layout they didn't spend all their savings on engineering it to perfection. obviously it wasn't a lego piece made by a 3 year old either though but you know what i mean.

My un-engineering qualified brain is wondering now how the drive is delivered to the front wheels. i'm gonna have to go back and look at the pic

ah yes now i see they're 2 drive shafts. looks like the 4WD things i used to make from the that technics lego when i was a kid, ok maybe a bit better than that.

no wonder the thing weighs 1.7 tonne though... not that carbon fibre they're made from (or whatever light stuff it is) really weighs a lot.... but still the car weighs a lot. whats with that?

Edited by Black Betty

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I myself AM TOTALLY UNPREPARED TO BELIEVE that the load is higher on the track than on the dyno. If it is not happening on the dyno, I cannot see it happening on the track. The difference you are seeing is because it is hot on the track, and I am pretty sure your tuner is not belting the crap out of it on teh dyno when it starts to get hot. The only way that being hot on the track can lead to real ping, that I can think of, is if you are getting more oil (from mist in the inlet tract, or going up past the oil control rings) reducing the effective octane rating of the fuel and causing ping that way. Yeah, nah. Look at this graph which I will helpfully show you zoomed back in. As an engineer, I look at the difference in viscocity at (in your case, 125°C) and say "they're all the same number". Even though those lines are not completely collapsed down onto each other, the oil grades you are talking about (40, 50 and 60) are teh top three lines (150, 220 and 320) and as far as I am concerned, there is not enough difference between them at that temperature to be meaningful. The viscosity of 60 at 125°C is teh same as 40 at 100°C. You should not operate it under high load at high temperature. That is purely because the only way they can achieve their emissions numbers is with thin-arse oil in it, so they have to tell you to put thin oil in it for the street. They know that no-one can drive the car & engine hard enough on the street to reach the operating regime that demands the actual correct oil that the engine needs on the track. And so they tell you to put that oil in for the track. Find a way to get more air into it, or, more likely, out of it. Or add a water spray for when it's hot. Or something.   As to the leak --- a small leak that cannot cause near catastrophic volume loss in a few seconds cannot cause a low pressure condition in the engine. If the leak is large enough to drop oil pressure, then you will only get one or two shots at it before the sump is drained.
    • So..... it's going to be a heater hose or other coolant hose at the rear of the head/plenum. Or it's going to be one of the welch plugs on the back of the motor, which is a motor out thing to fix.
    • The oil pressure sensor for logging, does it happen to be the one that was slowly breaking out of the oil block? If it is,I would be ignoring your logs. You had a leak at the sensor which would mean it can't read accurately. It's a small hole at the sensor, and you had a small hole just before it, meaning you could have lost significant pressure reading.   As for brakes, if it's just fluid getting old, you won't necessarily end up with air sitting in the line. Bleed a shit tonne of fluid through so you effectively replace it and go again. Oh and, pay close attention to the pressure gauge while on track!
    • I don't know it is due to that. It could just be due to load on track being more than a dyno. But it would be nice to rule it out. We're talking a fraction of a second of pulling ~1 degree of timing. So it's not a lot, but I'd rather it be 0... Thicker oil isn't really a "bandaid" if it's oil that is going to run at 125C, is it? It will be thicker at 100 and thus at 125, where the 40 weight may not be as thick as one may like for that use. I already have a big pump that has been ported. They (They in this instance being the guy that built my heads) port them so they flow more at lower RPM but have a bypass spring that I believe is ~70psi. I have seen 70psi of oil pressure up top in the past, before I knew I had this leak. I have a 25 row oil cooler that takes up all the space in the driver side guard. It is interesting that GM themselves recommend 0-30 oil for their Vette applications. Unless you take it to the track where the official word is to put 20-50w oil in there, then take that back out after your track day is done and return to 0-30.
    • Nice, looks great. Nice work getting the factory parts also. Never know when you'll need them.
×
×
  • Create New...