Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

you heard the nazi mod. VOTE 1 Me..

hanson..?? i did not have sexual relations with that woman!!!... maybe

ive never been done for speeding its always RBTs and smacks for having mods on my car.. in the GTR.. i got pulled over for speeding up the back of a cop and backing off. he couldnt prove my speed so he smacked my wrist.. i enjoyed it

lool, if i remember correctly. your "smooth"

as far as voting, i dont think its up to ruddy or howard where cameras go, that all goes on in the police departments, they are self funded, hence the dodgy placement and no warning on cameras, (revenue raising) u can vote for who u like, in the end, unless either party says no to speed cameras or promises to sign post them all etc... its gona happen...

and RBT's are still common, well ive had a few, but my money is on them testing imports etc more than others....

Edited by RusH_
  • Replies 95
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Our police mistress said on the TV news last night that the cameras would be set at 1kph over the limit.

Now all of my cars are of an age where the standards for speedo accuracy was 10%

So doing the maximums math, and not allowing any tolerance on their equipment, I have to do 92 to register 101 on their camera.

92kph on a brand new freeway (Burpengary) that should have been signed at 110 anyway!!!!!!

Then allow a little less for the nervous types and you've got a recipe for multiple nose/tail collisions.

This is nothing more than a money grab hiding under the guise of road safety.

So basiclly what your saying is, just cruise past the speed camera at much much less than the signed speed limit...

Ie. Hold up traffic...? Cause i dont care what others behind me think, Ill go as slow as i want to make sure i dont trigger the damn thing...

Its like when you see a camera on the highway and you only doing 100 anyway, you still break and cruise past it at like 95 just to be sure...

1 kmph tolerance what a crock of crap, thats pretty much zero tolerance and will cause more dramas more crashes ie nose to tail esp in peak times, and here is the law trying to prevent injuries and damages? go figure that one out i cant

did anyone drive over the story bridge this morning? i didn't see a single sign for them

apparently they all have like 5 signs clearing stating that they are there or some shit

i didn't even see where they were

typical, of course the dnt wana sign post it, then ppl who dont know about it will get caught...

i saw one of those 4wd's on the side of the road the other day, noticed cos sum1 comin the other way high beamed, nehow, they had a sign saying speed camera being used or sumtin, it was placed about 1m from the car...

how is someone supposed to see that and realise they could get caught...i guess they arent meant to

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Block bump. $400. As above cyl 6 needs bore or sleeve.
    • I would think making the argument that the travel is limited by a spring flexing against a spring perch as "the same method". Later on in the document they do state that the spring can't bind on full bump travel and cannot come loose in full rebound travel as well. (which is all very sensible). The laws are actually pretty sensible and reasonable. It's just that the people who enforce and check them don't actually read them or know them accurately. "Oh, coilovers? Instant fail mate. Don't even need to look at it." - Guy who will be instantly reported by me. There is probably merit to people who do get defected for height also get defected for the suspension in that state that allows it. I did never consider the people who are complaining about coilovers being picked on are also running around at 50mm off the floor.
    • I think given SAU's knowledge of E85 we can strongly conclude that 10% ethanol in almost any situation is entirely fine. Almost all of the myths against E85 were overblown, let alone E10.
    • From your link See bold text, is this referring to damper settings, if so that may a issue for "some" inspectors, I cannot see aftermarket coilovers having the evidence that "must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original" Maybe just remove the adjustment knows and hope for the best???? Meh 5.2 Suspension travel In all instances, modifications to a vehicle’s suspension must ensure the integrity of the system and not compromise the ride quality. At least two thirds of the original suspension travel should be maintained in both directions (rebound (i.e. extension) and bump (i.e. compression)), and rebound must be limited by the same method used by the vehicle manufacturer or if this is not practicable due to the nature of the modification, an equivalent method. If an alternative method is used, evidence must be available that its functional performance is equivalent to the original.
    • They actually don't - They adhere to VSB14 rules just like Victoria. The rules are against CABIN adjustable height, and it quite clearly states that the height has to be within parameters. I asked the VASS engineer to confirm this when I got my car engineered and they refused to engineer the coilovers because they didn't meet the requirements for requiring engineering. (mine are height adjustable.) People "Not wanting to bother" with "Actually reading/knowing/adhering to the rules" should result in fines and immediately losing the ability to issue blue slips and/or RWC's in Vic.
×
×
  • Create New...