Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I am running 231RWKW at 14PSI with awesome reliability. Changing the injectors soon with a more agressive tune will achieve 250 -260rwkw no probs.

I have only had her now for 1 month but she has not skipped a beat. Little bit laggy on a hot day but you get that.

  • 2 weeks later...

The guys a dyno queen person, but it has been tuned by people who know their stuff.

Yes I agree it's pointless topic but I was asked to ask the tough (stupid?) question.

It's his daily driver and still going strong. Runs 18PSI every day but doesn't get up it all the time(I wonder why!!)

Thanks for the replys.

I ran 300rwkw for 12 months and 352wkw for 6 months on my stock internaled RB25, was at every drag event, every track event, and used every day to work and back only now is it starting to get some blow by after 18 months of abuse.

Got my poor S14 down the unprepaired 400m in 11.6 @210kph in full street trim with coil overs setup for track racing (10kg/8kg)

I recon the methanol injection I run is a big part into why it lasted this long at 1.5 to 1.6bar on a hybrid GT3076R .82

Jason from WMC was running 370RWKW, did a 10.8 with backing off at the 300metre mark

His motor lasted 8months.

He just kept pushing more and more nitrous down it's throat to find the limit.

370RWKW was the GASLESS power.

The RB25 when setup right, WILL last along time.

The issue is, getting it setup right.

On behalf of a mate who has an R34GTT.

What is the most RWKW you have managed to get from an internally stock(pistons and rods) RB25DET, R33 or R34.

Stock RB25DET NEO,

tomei 260 poncams,

plazmaman intake manifold

High mount mainfold with TO4Z

800cc injectors

044 pump

pressure reg

363RWKW @22PSI Dyno dynamics shootout without nos.

Cheers.

Do you know how many Kms were on this motor?

I would think motor age would play a big part on how long it would last at that sort of power...

  • 2 weeks later...
On behalf of a mate who has an R34GTT.

What is the most RWKW you have managed to get from an internally stock(pistons and rods) RB25DET, R33 or R34.

Stock RB25DET NEO,

tomei 260 poncams,

plazmaman intake manifold

High mount mainfold with TO4Z

800cc injectors

044 pump

pressure reg

363RWKW @22PSI Dyno dynamics shootout without nos.

Cheers.

sorry for the offtopic question but does your mate run stronger valve springs with those cams at that powerlevel, or is the head otherwise untouched??

cheers

  • 3 months later...
  • 1 month later...

It is my r34gtt that GTRsean is talking about way back in nov07 and to even my suprise i still have the same engine in it. All i have done since the fitment of the to4z is change one coil pack.. still drive it to work everyday. It had 98 fuel in when we made 364kw at night and has made within 10kw difference on 2 other dyno's, if anyone was there it is the red 34gtt that was at the unofficial dyno day at hills earlier this year and made 339kw at 20psi.

gotta say what a strong stock bottom end nissan made.

From what I can see the NEO is alot better engine than the rest the head is obviously different but could be down to newer materials?

I might drag out the power level with my next mods then see how far she can go .. 300rwkw should be enough for work tho.

i know the old jms 33 was running around 400kw and last a year n 1/2 of denzo abuse then another 6 months before it was retired for a 30 bottom end.... which lasted stuff all i think mark went through 3 or 4 bottom ends in the following months, it was then sent back to a rb25 bottom end n mild boost n sold!

go the 25 :P i would say 260-280 with a metal headgasket would be very reliable, then again it depends on how the engine has been maintained throughout its life!

I was running a stock one at 1.5 bar for well over a year at that power level. Now I have a 1.2 tomei and cranked up the boost to around 1.7-1.8 bar if I'm on the Japanese high octane gas, not base gas.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...