Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 53
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Guest terrance

i was driving through sunshine on sat night, and there was a flashing camera going full sick. it got about three cars going the opposite direction from me. poor c*nts.

i realise this thing wont work for all cams, but if it saves you only once a year, its a good year.

. . .

i sh*t the bed, thats why im up so late.

Camera's still need flashes at night and the red light camera's flash day or night. Even when a speed camera durin the day does not use a flash the rate of successful shots drops substantially, but as less people see the camera they get more photos so it adds up in their favour. This spay if it does replect will work against flashing cameras.

Mick.

they don't flash? - oh well, i guess we'll just have to take our number plates off altogether

yes, just ask dj_lethal how long you can get away with that for :)

i was driving through sunshine on sat night, and there was a flashing camera going full sick. it got about three cars going the opposite direction from me.

yup, see it often, idiots are pretty dumb sometimes - car on the side of the road clear as day, box as obvious as your grandmother's...see if all the dickheads didn't get caught in obvious situations like that then they wouldn't get enough revenue and soon give up.

Even when a speed camera durin the day does not use a flash the rate of successful shots drops substantially, but as less people see the camera they get more photos so it adds up in their favour.

Well if you think about it, while a flash will increase the reflectivity significantly of anything, its not mandatory.. however if you take photos of anything reflective during the day it still can flare it all out with the right conditions and things - so could well work during the day.

I was watching something on TV last night.. they sounded a bit shitscared and admitted not much could be done just said "don't do it". Even admitted pretty much "its just not practical to ban certain products out there". In other words, other common aerosols will work just as well :D Now which brands, ones, etc??

i suggested for my flatmate to try the hairspray idea out and go at 100km/hr past the fixed camera here but he declined :D

Originally posted by Interloper

they don't flash? - oh well, i guess we'll just have to take our number plates off altogether :mad:

Get your skyline to the drive in and watch that film from the RING, and then make a copy and pass it on so Samara wont come after you.

Originally posted by Bleach1

Its a $75 fine in NSW. Hair spray and so on doesnt work. I know someone who tried it. I wouldnt trust this stuff either untill i saw it work.

is that the speeding fine or for having the can of hairspray ? not that i use it me prefur gel personally :)

i saw someone get flashed from one of those combined red light and speed cameras. the thing is though that the light was green. i thought the idea was to stop people speeding up through orange lights, well thats what they told us. if that was true then it would only come on when the light goes orange. obviously they couldnt pass up an opurtunity to have another fixed speed camera out there making plenty of money for them

Guest Yoda

unfortunately, the speed cameras are the other way around in WA. they take pic from the front. and they dont send the pic to you in the mail. if you want to see it (worthwhile, coz its often the wrong car) you have to make an appointment and go it there. if its unclear (the plate) they often send it out to all the ones that its close to. they say if you pay, then you are admitting guilt. sucks so much. so what 'some people' do (not me of course :) is to send a cheque for about $1.50 more than the amount of the fine. so they cant cash it, because then they'd be recieving money illegally, and its not enough to send a refund checque for! this person i know (who looks a lot like me) has done it a few times now. :( worked every time! dont make it too much over tho, or its worth their while to refund it... :D

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was using the wiring diagram I have So 12.74V is coming into the rear Fuel Pump relay as I measured.  When I turn the key to ON im getting 0.6V to the Fuel Pump plug; which i assume is backfeed voltage and doesnt include the 12V from ignition power.  The rear relay is working and being triggered.  From the diagram I clearly see the rear relay 80 = Rear Relay going into the Body/H loom (R-27) 27 = Fuel Pump plug going into the Body/H loom (T-20) 40 = Short Connector (R-27) I'm reading 12.74V on the blue/black wire which is the power for the Fuel Pump   From this diagram I can see the Ignition relay goes into the front and up to the ignition  2 = Fuel Pump Relay <1M> (R-27) 37 = ING Relay <1M> I started from the pump using this reference Which the way I read it (referencing Nissan wiring color codes) is: Pin Wire Color Function 1 B/P (Black/Pink) Ground 2 L/W (Blue/White)        ECU Trigger 3 SB (Sky Blue) Fuel Pump 5 L/B (Blue/Black) 12V Constant Tested SB to SB on Fuel Pump for continuity - confirmed Tested negative on Fuel Pump to 12V battery and L/B - confirmed 12V Pulled the relay putting 12V between Pin 1 & 2 and testing continuity on Pin 3 & 4 - confirmed relay   So that has me looking at this part of the circuit to understand whats happening here...and im still confused. From best I can tell; the disconnect is back to my previous diagram; between Ignition Relay and Fuel Pump Relay...which yet again; afaik is where the immobiliser should.    Thats what I was trying to explain to GTSboy; im not trying to fix it myself; yet I seem to have to get a Masters in Electrical Engineering (while im busy doing my actual job of DevOps & Cloud Engineering) somehow.  I just wanted more expert opinions; or more so that what I tested is correct and proves it to something around that area; to go back to the alarm tech (for a 3rd time) that he needs to fix it. He keeps telling me its not the alarm. He lives on the complete other side of the city so i understand not wanting to make a trip but as I said before if its the alarm it should be up to him to fix it. But he's adament its not; even though I pointed out the FP was immobilised through the original alarm. To my mind; it seems that the ECU is sending the signal; but the ignition is not getting 12V down the line.       
    • Maybe also really stiffly sprung track cars. Get the inside wheel up in a corner and all the fun stops. Also me sometimes (rarely) when I have to stand on the brake to convince the diff to drive the wheel that is still on the ground when I'm trying to diagonally get over severe driveway entrance, etc.
    • I feel like I'm missing something. You had an authorised installer come out and install a new alarm. Post install the car doesn't start, and you aren't getting the installer back to fix what they did wrong?
    • So either way it is gearbox out and look what is wrong?  I know about the input shaft bearing. Even before swap/new clutch the it sounded exactly like this: So is that inout shaft bearing or the other was installed backwards?  And can some please tell me the part number for that input shaft bearing? The gearbox is small box from R34 N/A and number is FS5W71C. Thank you  
    • I am yet to see anyone ever regret a quaife or helical. ...other than drifting/skidpan duties. I kind of want to upgrade my factory helical with a Quaife (but really it's not ultimately that different, and is a MASSIVE UNDERTAKING), that's how good the hype is about them, that I want to try them 'just to see'  
×
×
  • Create New...