Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With the gate fully opened (ie the actuator disconnected so the flap moves freely) both of our cars still make near 1.3bar of boost so it definetely isn't the actuator and i have changed dump pipes so it aint the dump pipe. For my car the only thing i think it could be is in the stock ECU retarding the timing so much. In Simon-R32's case i have no clue what it could be, and if my microtech being tuned doesn't fix the problem then im going to be in the same boat as him :P

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it sounds like simon and PM-R33 have two different problems

Simon sounds like his just can't get enough air around the turbo. So it boosts up some more.

PM-R33 just sounds like pure boost creep.

cam timing has alot to do with it... when my cam timing was out, i couldnt hold less then 20psi

Really? Well i hope thats what mine is then. So when it got tuned and the timing was corrected it held boost perfectly?

it deffinately has something to do with ur wastegate actuator,

also make sure u have a 1bar actuator on there not a 1.5bar

This is something I agree with - double check the spec of your actuator.

Secondly, while the pics of your turbine housing show the wastegate arm moved through a big arc, have you checked to see how widely a wastegate normally opens? Basically it moves enough to unseat the valve, and then enough to vent excess gas. Probably 8-10mm or so, but no more from the observations I've made.

Which makes me ask - how/where is the actuator mounted on the turbo? Main point of interest here is the angle that the actuator rod has to work on. If it is a dicky angle, then the actuator might push to its maximum extent but not really enough to vent the main turbine flow and control boost effectively. I did read your comment about disconnecting the wastegate and getting 17psi, but you're getting 20psi. A revision of the actuator mounting bracket and actuator rod position might be in order? If it gets a fairly straight push onto the bell crank then you're getting the valve moved through the maximum available travel. Hope that makes sense.

^^^ Simon its common knowledge even the melb garret distributor knows the int gate is too small to work correctley.... he was the one who recommended a reah housing swap.

as for PM-R33 with the HKS GT-RS issues i havent had any dramas so im sorry i cant help there.

This is something I agree with - double check the spec of your actuator.

Secondly, while the pics of your turbine housing show the wastegate arm moved through a big arc, have you checked to see how widely a wastegate normally opens? Basically it moves enough to unseat the valve, and then enough to vent excess gas. Probably 8-10mm or so, but no more from the observations I've made.

Which makes me ask - how/where is the actuator mounted on the turbo? Main point of interest here is the angle that the actuator rod has to work on. If it is a dicky angle, then the actuator might push to its maximum extent but not really enough to vent the main turbine flow and control boost effectively. I did read your comment about disconnecting the wastegate and getting 17psi, but you're getting 20psi. A revision of the actuator mounting bracket and actuator rod position might be in order? If it gets a fairly straight push onto the bell crank then you're getting the valve moved through the maximum available travel. Hope that makes sense.

Actuator is definetely 1bar, its a genuine HKS GTRS kit for an RB25. Lots of people use this turbo with no problems so i seriously doubt that the rear housing is too small because im pretty sure garret and HKS would have found this out, afterall, HKS get the exhaust housing built to their specification.

Secondly, the actuator came mounted on the turbo when it was brand new and i have never removed it, other then taking the circlip of the end of the rod. The flap opens freely and doesn't hit on anything and the actuator is in perfect working condition, it opens over 90 degrees when the flap is disconnected, if exhaust gas cant flow properly through that then i dont know what can. I am nearly 100% sure it is not an issue with the actuator, nor is it an issue for the dump pipe as i have 2 completely different dump pipes and both do the exact thing.

The car will be tuned in January and hopefully it is due to the timing being so retarded that unburnt fuel is going straight through the exhaust manifold and igniting creating a sudden rush of exhaust gas, which in turn is spinning the exhaust turbine and creating boost that cannot be controlled by the wastegate. (Atleast that is my understanding of how timing is affecting this as this is roughly how i have been explained it)

So yeah unless someone has a better theory other then saying the actuator is f****d id like to hear their input.

ok so in the last few days i have done the following.

-Bored out the wastegate hole in the rear housing

-enlarged the wastegate opening in the dump pipe area

-die grinded all edges to give the best possible flow path

-welded the flap onto its hinge to overcome seating issue

-modified the actuator rod so its not on such an angle

-wound a tiny amount of pre load onto the wastegate

just took it for a drive with EBC off, and just running off the actuator, seems in 3rd gear it stays around 0.9 bar now and peaks at 1.1 - 1.2 bar near the limiter... so this i can live with. still pulls bloody hard so i will retune the car and get the thing ramping up earlier with some more preload.

Simon you may find that the EBC can now go about its job of allowing boost to ramp earlier, so sounds like the efforts have paid off to a degree. The right sort of preload would probably help further. It would be nice to get it perfect, but Trent has obviously seen some issues with various combinations. Have you called GCG or HPinabox to check if there are similar experiences with your spec 3071, and if so what is the fix (if any)? I guess if you can get it to the point that it is "satisfactory" then all ok - go and DRIVE it :banana:

Just to clarify Phil, I wasn't actually concentrating on nutting out the issue your GT-RS has. My comments were directed solely to Simon's setup, and no, I have no opinion as to the cause of your overboosting. I hope you can get it right.

Suggestion: If you believe your timing is retarded, then assuming you have a programmable ECU why not try progressively advancing the thing to see what happens? I can confirm that retarded timing DOES result in elevated exhaust temps. While tuning my PFC, I had the whole map retarded by about 6-7 degrees due to the position of the CAS. Pyrometer read +150 degrees C on cruise, and the car ran like a dog. Would not pull. Believe me, if you have retarded ignition you will know about it.

Just to clarify Phil, I wasn't actually concentrating on nutting out the issue your GT-RS has. My comments were directed solely to Simon's setup, and no, I have no opinion as to the cause of your overboosting. I hope you can get it right.

Suggestion: If you believe your timing is retarded, then assuming you have a programmable ECU why not try progressively advancing the thing to see what happens? I can confirm that retarded timing DOES result in elevated exhaust temps. While tuning my PFC, I had the whole map retarded by about 6-7 degrees due to the position of the CAS. Pyrometer read +150 degrees C on cruise, and the car ran like a dog. Would not pull. Believe me, if you have retarded ignition you will know about it.

Woops my bad man.

Yeah its running a stock ECU at the moment so timing would be incredibly out. Microtech is going in soon though.

Simon you may find that the EBC can now go about its job of allowing boost to ramp earlier, so sounds like the efforts have paid off to a degree. The right sort of preload would probably help further. It would be nice to get it perfect, but Trent has obviously seen some issues with various combinations. Have you called GCG or HPinabox to check if there are similar experiences with your spec 3071, and if so what is the fix (if any)? I guess if you can get it to the point that it is "satisfactory" then all ok - go and DRIVE it :banana:

Just to clarify Phil, I wasn't actually concentrating on nutting out the issue your GT-RS has. My comments were directed solely to Simon's setup, and no, I have no opinion as to the cause of your overboosting. I hope you can get it right.

Suggestion: If you believe your timing is retarded, then assuming you have a programmable ECU why not try progressively advancing the thing to see what happens? I can confirm that retarded timing DOES result in elevated exhaust temps. While tuning my PFC, I had the whole map retarded by about 6-7 degrees due to the position of the CAS. Pyrometer read +150 degrees C on cruise, and the car ran like a dog. Would not pull. Believe me, if you have retarded ignition you will know about it.

GCG have been more then helpful, They state that its rather common for cars with very open exhausts and no cats such as my track set up. there a couple of solutions that we will prob try after this competition that im attending in melb this coming weekend

Got the boost down lower now, still makes 265 rwkw, so the set up is great now, ramps up earlier and pulls so damn hard! wharts more even tho it was hot, we did run after run and the power was repeatable so heat wasnt too much of an issue

did have fuel issues again, turns out my walbro intake which feeds the external bosch was breaking down internally and causing a restriction.... also turns out that its not a genuine walbro and its a copy!! all this time i thought it was a genuine! dodgy shit, only way to tell was to put a known genuine one side by side with the copy and look internally where the filter pick up goes. externally they look exactaly the same.

MASSIVE THANKS TO JEFF TSL AND THE BOYS FROM TURBO TUNE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
×
×
  • Create New...