Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

With the gate fully opened (ie the actuator disconnected so the flap moves freely) both of our cars still make near 1.3bar of boost so it definetely isn't the actuator and i have changed dump pipes so it aint the dump pipe. For my car the only thing i think it could be is in the stock ECU retarding the timing so much. In Simon-R32's case i have no clue what it could be, and if my microtech being tuned doesn't fix the problem then im going to be in the same boat as him :P

  • Replies 42
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

it sounds like simon and PM-R33 have two different problems

Simon sounds like his just can't get enough air around the turbo. So it boosts up some more.

PM-R33 just sounds like pure boost creep.

cam timing has alot to do with it... when my cam timing was out, i couldnt hold less then 20psi

Really? Well i hope thats what mine is then. So when it got tuned and the timing was corrected it held boost perfectly?

it deffinately has something to do with ur wastegate actuator,

also make sure u have a 1bar actuator on there not a 1.5bar

This is something I agree with - double check the spec of your actuator.

Secondly, while the pics of your turbine housing show the wastegate arm moved through a big arc, have you checked to see how widely a wastegate normally opens? Basically it moves enough to unseat the valve, and then enough to vent excess gas. Probably 8-10mm or so, but no more from the observations I've made.

Which makes me ask - how/where is the actuator mounted on the turbo? Main point of interest here is the angle that the actuator rod has to work on. If it is a dicky angle, then the actuator might push to its maximum extent but not really enough to vent the main turbine flow and control boost effectively. I did read your comment about disconnecting the wastegate and getting 17psi, but you're getting 20psi. A revision of the actuator mounting bracket and actuator rod position might be in order? If it gets a fairly straight push onto the bell crank then you're getting the valve moved through the maximum available travel. Hope that makes sense.

^^^ Simon its common knowledge even the melb garret distributor knows the int gate is too small to work correctley.... he was the one who recommended a reah housing swap.

as for PM-R33 with the HKS GT-RS issues i havent had any dramas so im sorry i cant help there.

This is something I agree with - double check the spec of your actuator.

Secondly, while the pics of your turbine housing show the wastegate arm moved through a big arc, have you checked to see how widely a wastegate normally opens? Basically it moves enough to unseat the valve, and then enough to vent excess gas. Probably 8-10mm or so, but no more from the observations I've made.

Which makes me ask - how/where is the actuator mounted on the turbo? Main point of interest here is the angle that the actuator rod has to work on. If it is a dicky angle, then the actuator might push to its maximum extent but not really enough to vent the main turbine flow and control boost effectively. I did read your comment about disconnecting the wastegate and getting 17psi, but you're getting 20psi. A revision of the actuator mounting bracket and actuator rod position might be in order? If it gets a fairly straight push onto the bell crank then you're getting the valve moved through the maximum available travel. Hope that makes sense.

Actuator is definetely 1bar, its a genuine HKS GTRS kit for an RB25. Lots of people use this turbo with no problems so i seriously doubt that the rear housing is too small because im pretty sure garret and HKS would have found this out, afterall, HKS get the exhaust housing built to their specification.

Secondly, the actuator came mounted on the turbo when it was brand new and i have never removed it, other then taking the circlip of the end of the rod. The flap opens freely and doesn't hit on anything and the actuator is in perfect working condition, it opens over 90 degrees when the flap is disconnected, if exhaust gas cant flow properly through that then i dont know what can. I am nearly 100% sure it is not an issue with the actuator, nor is it an issue for the dump pipe as i have 2 completely different dump pipes and both do the exact thing.

The car will be tuned in January and hopefully it is due to the timing being so retarded that unburnt fuel is going straight through the exhaust manifold and igniting creating a sudden rush of exhaust gas, which in turn is spinning the exhaust turbine and creating boost that cannot be controlled by the wastegate. (Atleast that is my understanding of how timing is affecting this as this is roughly how i have been explained it)

So yeah unless someone has a better theory other then saying the actuator is f****d id like to hear their input.

ok so in the last few days i have done the following.

-Bored out the wastegate hole in the rear housing

-enlarged the wastegate opening in the dump pipe area

-die grinded all edges to give the best possible flow path

-welded the flap onto its hinge to overcome seating issue

-modified the actuator rod so its not on such an angle

-wound a tiny amount of pre load onto the wastegate

just took it for a drive with EBC off, and just running off the actuator, seems in 3rd gear it stays around 0.9 bar now and peaks at 1.1 - 1.2 bar near the limiter... so this i can live with. still pulls bloody hard so i will retune the car and get the thing ramping up earlier with some more preload.

Simon you may find that the EBC can now go about its job of allowing boost to ramp earlier, so sounds like the efforts have paid off to a degree. The right sort of preload would probably help further. It would be nice to get it perfect, but Trent has obviously seen some issues with various combinations. Have you called GCG or HPinabox to check if there are similar experiences with your spec 3071, and if so what is the fix (if any)? I guess if you can get it to the point that it is "satisfactory" then all ok - go and DRIVE it :banana:

Just to clarify Phil, I wasn't actually concentrating on nutting out the issue your GT-RS has. My comments were directed solely to Simon's setup, and no, I have no opinion as to the cause of your overboosting. I hope you can get it right.

Suggestion: If you believe your timing is retarded, then assuming you have a programmable ECU why not try progressively advancing the thing to see what happens? I can confirm that retarded timing DOES result in elevated exhaust temps. While tuning my PFC, I had the whole map retarded by about 6-7 degrees due to the position of the CAS. Pyrometer read +150 degrees C on cruise, and the car ran like a dog. Would not pull. Believe me, if you have retarded ignition you will know about it.

Just to clarify Phil, I wasn't actually concentrating on nutting out the issue your GT-RS has. My comments were directed solely to Simon's setup, and no, I have no opinion as to the cause of your overboosting. I hope you can get it right.

Suggestion: If you believe your timing is retarded, then assuming you have a programmable ECU why not try progressively advancing the thing to see what happens? I can confirm that retarded timing DOES result in elevated exhaust temps. While tuning my PFC, I had the whole map retarded by about 6-7 degrees due to the position of the CAS. Pyrometer read +150 degrees C on cruise, and the car ran like a dog. Would not pull. Believe me, if you have retarded ignition you will know about it.

Woops my bad man.

Yeah its running a stock ECU at the moment so timing would be incredibly out. Microtech is going in soon though.

Simon you may find that the EBC can now go about its job of allowing boost to ramp earlier, so sounds like the efforts have paid off to a degree. The right sort of preload would probably help further. It would be nice to get it perfect, but Trent has obviously seen some issues with various combinations. Have you called GCG or HPinabox to check if there are similar experiences with your spec 3071, and if so what is the fix (if any)? I guess if you can get it to the point that it is "satisfactory" then all ok - go and DRIVE it :banana:

Just to clarify Phil, I wasn't actually concentrating on nutting out the issue your GT-RS has. My comments were directed solely to Simon's setup, and no, I have no opinion as to the cause of your overboosting. I hope you can get it right.

Suggestion: If you believe your timing is retarded, then assuming you have a programmable ECU why not try progressively advancing the thing to see what happens? I can confirm that retarded timing DOES result in elevated exhaust temps. While tuning my PFC, I had the whole map retarded by about 6-7 degrees due to the position of the CAS. Pyrometer read +150 degrees C on cruise, and the car ran like a dog. Would not pull. Believe me, if you have retarded ignition you will know about it.

GCG have been more then helpful, They state that its rather common for cars with very open exhausts and no cats such as my track set up. there a couple of solutions that we will prob try after this competition that im attending in melb this coming weekend

Got the boost down lower now, still makes 265 rwkw, so the set up is great now, ramps up earlier and pulls so damn hard! wharts more even tho it was hot, we did run after run and the power was repeatable so heat wasnt too much of an issue

did have fuel issues again, turns out my walbro intake which feeds the external bosch was breaking down internally and causing a restriction.... also turns out that its not a genuine walbro and its a copy!! all this time i thought it was a genuine! dodgy shit, only way to tell was to put a known genuine one side by side with the copy and look internally where the filter pick up goes. externally they look exactaly the same.

MASSIVE THANKS TO JEFF TSL AND THE BOYS FROM TURBO TUNE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...